| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Comments:
<0> ptlis: ... and 800 quid is what I'd have to pay for a 32" TFT.
<1> Really?
<2> anyhow, gotta go fix their puter now. g'day all. afk.
<1> I picked up this for just over after VAT
<0> ptlis: NEC or Samsung ... can get an LG for less. But it's still measly 32 inches, and needs a PC.
<1> Ah, this is one of the newer Mirai
<1> HDMI/DVI/DSUB support
<1> I don't think it can deal with composite though
<0> ptlis: sounds like a good buy
<1> Yeah, I was originally looking at a 27" monitor, but the 32" ended up being only more expensive
<3> hello
<3> how can i find a software to take a website to see it offline (if it's possible i would like a USB software)
<4> seon: plukr
<4> seon: plucker, wget, pavuk, the list is rather long
<0> seon: or do you mean to browse it offline?
<1> wget is my preferred weapon of choice
<5> wget rocks
<3> Dorward> for windows
<5> i hear curl is better though, if you know how to use it
<5> seon: wget
<4> seon: Yes? I don't know about pavuk, but the others I listed are certainly available for Windows. I've used them on Windows.
<3> Dorward> i want to aspire one website
<3> Dorward> not see a website
<5> google
<5> i'm using wget on windows right now
<5> and the binary was very easy to find
<4> seon: I don't think you mean "aspire", I don't know what you mean, but that work doesn't really work in that sentence.
<5> acquire?
<0> Dorward: perhaps that word doesn't mean what he thinks it means?
<4> hax: Could be ... in which case the tools I suggested are STILL the right answer.
<5> heh yeah
<5> btw, is it just me, or is there a *lot* of porn on the internets?
<6> there are no porn sites on the internet
<6> what are you talking about
<5> not even sites, just media
<5> there is more porn out there in every niche category than i could possibly consume
<7> grandmas curdled milk facial shots w/ hot blue goat & taco action
<8> ...kay
<5> hahaha
<7> blu ray now available
<5> clearly
<9> sorry for spamming you all with reconnects, it should be better now
<8> giant flash drives now available
<10> with INPUT TYPE = submit, I want to be able to change the name, but then I want to be able to specify the value it shows up as in a POST, can this be done?
<11> i want chat
<8> ...
<12> CrazyTux, Then just set it's name and value.
<10> webben_, problem is Value is the name it displays as
<10> webben_, although I want its actual POST value to be different.
<10> webben_, i.e. 1, 2, 3.
<12> CrazyTux, ah, no you can't do that
<10> webben_, ah ok thanks.
<12> CrazyTux, why not stick the value you want in a hidden field?
<10> webben_, because I have multiple submit buttons
<12> CrazyTux, and read the hidden fields depending on which submit was presse
<10> webben_, depending on which one was selected I need a different action
<12> CrazyTux, yes ... that's not incompatible with hidden fields
<10> webben_, whats that?
<12> CrazyTux, "that" == having multiple submit controls.
<10> webben_, I know but how would I know which submit button was hit?
<12> CrazyTux, well set it's name and value attributes
<12> *its
<12> CrazyTux, http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/interact/forms.html#h-17.2
<12> successful controls send their name and value
<12> CrazyTux, (and if that didn't work for some reason, just use multiple forms)
<5> hmm, i need a tasty lunch
<5> brb
<13> why you think the net was boooorn
<8> peace-keeper: share data
<14> is there any simple fix for this? i know it has to do with inline elements and whitespace, but it'd be nice to keep the whitespace. i guess i could try some float: left; trickery, but.. i figured i'd ask anyway. here's the link i'm referring to (the css is all inline to make it easy): http://www.vanir.de/~jeff/example.html
<14> oh, right, i forgot to mention that IE6 is the issue, nothing else really (i've tested it okay in opera and firefox, at least)
<8> jeef: all that and you didn't say what 'this' _is_
<14> yeah, i did, at the end, i gave a link to it
<14> i just forgot to mention it requires IE6 to see it
<14> the issue is clear once you view it..
<14> i gave away the issue when i mentioned the inline/whitespace stuff, it's just extra "marginal" space around elements.. due to the whitespace between the elements in the actual html
<14> i ***umed it would be clear in such a concise example
<12> jeef, yeah the simple fix is to remove the whitespace, especially if these are <li>
<14> yeah, i know, but removing the whitespace is atrocious
<8> jeef: are these elements li's?
<14> i guess float: left; would work, really... b ut.. meh
<14> yeah, lis.
<8> jeef: yeah that's what I'd do
<8> float: left;
<14> drats, i was hoping there'd be something smoother than float: left;
<14> because now i have to worry about clearing them at the end with something, be it :after or some other hacked-up fix
<14> meh, i suppose i could use overflow: auto;
<8> jeef: sometimes, yeah :)
<14> sometimes referrinng to which?
<14> thanks for the re***urance, at least, reisio :)
<15> hi ... funny behaviour of window.onblur on firefox / mac / osx ... can anybody be convinced to care? :^)
<15> (basically- i'm trying to detect two situations across browsers / platforms- window minimized and/or window not focused)
<16> ȷ <- these characters are unicode ?
<17> i would certainly hope so
<8> adssss: no
<8> adssss: what is rendered from them likely exist in Unicode, too, however
<17> well, it's not utf-8 obviously, or it would be two bytes and not 6 ;p
<17> but aren't the codepoints themselves referred to as unicode?
<18> Hi. How can I resize an iframe depending on its content in order to make scrolling unnecessary? I have already found some JS-solution, but they only work for iframe-pages of the same domain as the "mother-page"...
<19> Hi. How safe is `HTML Tidy`?
<19> I'm filtering all my pages through it, and I'm wondering, whether it could mess some of them up.
<20> do you have the most recent version?
<0> Xif: as any software it can't be entirely bug free, but I've not seen it create a mess.
<19> barrensoul: the most recent build for Windows.
<20> which would be?
<19> HTML Tidy for Windows released on 14 February 2006
<8> Xif: it's not too horrible
<8> Xif: just _do not_ tell it to use a transitional doctype :p
<19> hehe :)
<20> 26 October, 2005.
<20> that's the latest
<19> Windrose: appearantly, it turns invalid markup to valid XHTML.
<20> o.O
<21> can anyone recommend a good tool for searching and replacing over multiple lines?
<20> lines of what?
<19> friedbyte: on linux - grep
<21> lines of text
<21> for windows
<20> find replace?
<20> :)
<19> friedbyte: there's grep for Windows, though I don't like it.
<20> don't need it
<20> dired?
<20> like dire?
<20> or dir
<19> barrensoul: well, I ***ume he's asking about something more than the common editor S&R
<20> XD sorry working on the one line thing
<19> dired buffers are buffers displaying files.
<20> ah
<20> file streams?
<0> Xif: yes, well, there is that bug ..
<19> barrensoul: you can display an entire directory structure, mark all the files you want, and do a regex S&R on them.
<20> there is only one piece of software that can be bug-free
<20> hello world in VB
<19> it's really cool, and it works on Windows.
<20> screwing that up accidentaly takes skill ^_^
<0> barrensoul: yes, well. Non-trivial software, then.
<20> :)
<19> Windrose: seems a bit too intrusive too me. What if I just want something to make sure all my pages are valid XHTML Strict?
<20> HTML tidy can do that as well
<20> it dosn't have to modify the code
<19> i.e. like tidy, except bark instead of change my source.
<0> Xif: then you want a validator, not tidy.
<19> Windrose: any recommeneded validator?
<20> w3c's?
Return to
#web
or
Go to some related
logs:
Gdmsetup: Gtk-Warning **: can't open display
#linux
.lesshst disable ubuntu
#gentoo
#qemu
firefox page-break-inside li
#math
#perl
#css
dovecot address rewrite
|
|