| |
| |
| |
|
Comments:
<0> Hello.
<0> How do I configure sendmail to send e-mail to another computer? I'm in a slackware machine, and it's sending e-mail only for local users.
<1> hey - errm - any reason why sendmail wouldnt route virtual domain deliveries through procmail ??
<1> eg normal user mail gets filtered , but mail routed via virtusertable appears not to
<2> uh. how can you tell?
<1> twkm, users comlaining that their procmail rules arent being invoked
<1> twkm, and testing I can see that happening
<2> you should probably enable logging.
<1> I have procmail logging - those messages dont show ...
<2> then look in your sendmail logs.
<1> mailer=local, pri=32687, relay=lance, dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent
<2> there you go, the lda was invoked.
<1> that doesnt go through procmail whereas
<1> mailer=local, pri=31099, dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent
<1> does ...
<1> the diff is that the 1st is a virtusertable entry mapping
<2> yet both go via the local mailer.
<1> yep - apparently
<2> so, if the local mailer is procmail you should have seen something logged (if you in fact enabled logging where it is useful).
<1> supposedly
<1> hmm - I just tested it and it did see it ...
<1> back to the drawing board
<1> wil check user again ...
<1> thanks for input anyway :)
<2> happy hunting.
<3> hello
<3> how can i reject this message from=<>, size=11846, cl***=0, nrcpts=1
<3> it tries all user names possible
<2> rejecting bounces is not allowed.
<4> symtab: firewall the attacking IP
<5> i have been ***igned a new task - yey
<5> use sendmail as a store and forward server
<2> thrilling.
<5> anyone know what im talking about
<5> ?
<2> have you considered reading cf/README and doc/op/op.*?
<5> twkm, i havent read the docs. just wondering where i start
<5> twkm, its hard to go through the docs when i dont really know what im looking for
<5> can you shed some light
<6> hey there, need to resend all e-mail in a mailbox to another address, it there a simple way to do that?
<6> looking at formail now, but can't seem to construct the right command
<6> cat beerens-zeilmakerij.com-angelique | formail -t -I "To: mail@addy.com" | procmail -f-
<6> doesn't seems to do much at all
<6> i figured it out thx.
<7> I'm sure this is asked frequently, but there is so much sendmail info on the net that it is difficult to find what you're looking for. Could someone tell me how to edit sendmail.cf to forward all system mail to another mail server within the lan?
<2> i would suggest reading cf/README.
<2> but people seem to hate to read documentation though they'll read hundreds of mis-hits from google, so i'll say: you may want LUSER_RELAY or MAIL_HUB.
<7> I don't seem to have that file
<2> really? sad. your vendor is annoying.
<2> a slightly outdated one is at http://sendmail.org/m4/readme.html
<8> I've been reading about DomainKeys, but I still don't "get it". What actually SIGNS the message?
<8> A sendmail milter?
<8> Basically I'd like to only support message signing in situations where SMTP AUTH is in play.
<8> And I host *hundreds* of domains.
<2> i'm sure yahoo! will be impressed.
<2> the mta signs the message, yes via a milter (dkim-milter).
<9> hi, I really can't open my box to recieve mail from outside.Is that difficult for some reasons ? I get a "connection refused" from remote boxes
<2> sounds like your connection is being refused.
<2> though i doubt it has anything to do with sendmail.
<9> 102> telnet paolino.selfip.org 25
<9> Trying 151.82.7.182...
<9> telnet: connect to address 151.82.7.182: Connection refused
<9> telnet: Unable to connect to remote host
<9> I took off the firewall completely
<2> then i guess sendmail isn't running.
<2> or you have it bound to address or addresses other than 151.82.7.182.
<9> 101> telnet localhost 25
<9> Trying ::1...
<9> telnet: connect to address ::1: Connection refused
<9> Trying 127.0.0.1...
<9> Connected to localhost.
<9> Escape character is '^]'.
<9> 220 paolino.selfip.org ESMTP Sendmail 8.13.4/8.13.4; Tue, 6 Jun 2006 16:12:21 +0200 (CEST)
<9> I'm on dialup
<9> tun0: flags=8151<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,PROMISC,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
<9> inet 151.82.7.182 --> 192.168.100.101 netmask 0xffffff00
<9> Opened by PID 231
<2> and?
<9> that is my address !
<2> so?
<2> tell sendmail to listen on that address.
<2> well, even better, tell it to listen on all addresses.
<9> ah, how is it done ?
<2> (re)configure it.
<2> probably in /etc/mail/sendmail.mc
<9> I'm there
<9> in paolino.selfip.org.mc
<2> let me guess, you are on freebsd and didn't bother to read the handbook -- right?
<9> I've been on the handbook actually
<2> naturally. wouldn't want to read how to use your system.
<2> rc.conf should have sendmail_enable=YES otherwise sendmail is instructed to listen only on the loopback interface.
<9> ok, I've been stupid enough, :(
<9> I gave that for sure
<2> the handbook is your friend. read a bit of it each day.
<9> thanks
<2> sure thing.
<10> Hi
<10> ALL
<10> sendmail-8.13.1-2
<10> I am getting
<10> Jun 6 22:58:54 smaapworld sendmail[4367]: k56HSrsV004367: ruleset=check_rcpt, arg1=<kaushalrs@aol.com>, relay=[59.92.135.30], reject=550 5.7.1 <kaushalrs@aol.com>... Relaying denied. IP name lookup failed [59.92.135.30]
<10> I followed http://www.joreybump.com/code/howto/smtpauth.html
<10> for SMTP AUTH
<10> Thanks everyone its working
<8> twkm: apparently that's the wrong milter.
<8> I need dk-milter
<2> okay.
<2> (not that i pay any attention to dk, or spf -- they are both flawed)
<8> true, but each mitigates a problem somewhat.
<8> So I'm willing to support all of them.
<8> THe problem is, I'm not seeing an easy way to have the milter support signing under multiple domains.
<8> i.e. if I host foo.com and bar.com to have each signed with its own key
<2> naturally.
<8> I mean, it's not QUITE like ssl -- i.e. the key itself isn't tied to a domain.
<8> So there's nothing STOPPING me from dropping the same private key in 20 DNS zones.
<2> and?
<8> But it's not like SPF either where I can just include a pointer to the main signing zone.
<8> i.e. if prime.gushi.org is the MTA server, I should be able to put just a "pointer" key in others.
<8> like the MX spf record.
<2> of course it isn't like spf, then it would be stupid in the say way.
<8> Differing levels of stupidity.
<8> This one in particular making it a serious pain in the *** to roll over a key.
<2> ****s to be you. my clients push millions of pieces of mail and there have been no siginificant issues that dk (or spf) would have solved -- wonderful to be me and my clients.
<8> Wow, thanks for your sentiment.
<2> sorry, that's how i feel about dk and spf and chasing either.
<8> So you've never had a single domain be used by a spammer?
<2> perhaps you'll find me some day, stuck in the snow and crying in by beer because the world has decided that either or both must exist or mail will fail, at which time feel free to crow that you've already gone through all that h***le.
<8> It's a technology that alleviates some of the h***le I've been experiencing, at the possible expense of spending a day learning to set it up, and a little CPU overhead for signing.
<2> of course, spammers have succesfully exploited some of the customers of a few of my clients. dk and spf wouldn't fix any of it, and having no dk or spf didn't slow the recovery to the more annoying domains.
<8> well that's exploitation of an actual server, yes?
<2> that's what you asked about.
<8> No, I was asking simply about if you'd had your customer domains joe-jobbed.
<8> And possibly had your customers flooded with false-bounces.
<2> naturally. anti-spam (mostly dcc or dspam) tossed 99+% of them in the trash.
Return to
#sendmail
or
Go to some related
logs:
#math
understanding bonnie++ results
gianluigibuffon
eggdrop running in vmware
wwwhizz
#gentoo
#perl
hoary w32codec
netfilter teql
my crazy world bbs
|
|