| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2
Comments:
<0> theres no one at rhel !
<0> i need support on my cluster
<1> ...
<1> 15:34 -!- Irssi: #rhel: Total of 63 nicks [1 ops, 0 halfops, 0 voices, 62 normal]
<0> Hydrogenum its empty
<1> ideafix: you probably mistyped it
<2> ideafix: if you're a rhel customer, call Red Hat
<0> can i use sype ?
<2> ideafix: I don't think they care how you call their toll free number.
<3> oh goody, found an old rh8 box
<3> is there a rpm -qa or something, that can check if the default config for a pakage has been altered?
<1> rpm -V
<3> ok..
<3> S.5....T c /etc/ssh/sshd_config
<3> S.5....T /usr/sbin/sshd
<3> does this tell me anything?
<1> it's fairly certain your box has been hacked
<1> looks like a trojan sshd has been installed
<3> heh heh i woudln't doubt it
<3> it's no mine
<3> how can you tell? is that 5 from a md5 or something?
<1> yse
<3> think i could get away with removing the ssh pakages and installing newer ones that match old rh8?
<1> well, if it was hacked you really need to reinstall
<1> there are probably other trojaned binaries on there
<1> rpm -V coreutils
<1> might be interesting
<3> heh heh ok hold
<3> guess it's not installed
<1> oh, hm, not sure what it was called back then
<3> maybe common or something
<3> base
<3> *shrug*
<1> rpm -V --whatprovides /bin/ls
<3> blank line
<3> hmmm
<3> weird
<0> Hydrogenum: /me thinks kreg_lt is pulling your leg
<3> heh i'm not
<3> but i'm willing to bet the box is pulling mine
<1> well, it's not conclusive, but definitely suspicious that sshd appears to have been replaced
<1> I'm not really up for telling you all my tricks of how to do forensics, though
<1> http://www.acm.uiuc.edu/sigmil/talks/compfore/forensics.html <-- I wrote that, might be useful for you
<0> Hydrogenum i have a HDD
<0> that is seagate but its recognised has CONNOR
<0> can i fix it ?
<1> I think seagate bought connor several years ago
<0> i was playting with some linux proggy that seems to hve FLASHED the drives specs
<0> cant remmeber its name even
<0> but was something from the cli
<3> Hydrogenum, thank you
<0> i think you could back up the hole drive to somne tar.bz file or something
<0> can you help me ?
<0> i was hoping toi install fedora on it
<0> but it report bad sectors
<0> do you think i could install fedora on it ?
<0> Hydrogenum
<0> are you there ?
<1> no
<1> he left a few mins ago
<0> why ?
<0> your not ansring any
<0> Hydrogenum is there any fedora based live cdroms ?
<0> Hydrogenum are you there ?
<0> mabey its me but i feel ignored right now
<1> no, your feelings are accurate :)
<0> any reason why theres no fedora based live distros ?
<0> Hydrogenum ?
<0> se you v just spoiled it the mach got extingushed
<1> that was my goal
<1> I didn't want you to burn yourself
<1> if I dumped water on you, it'd take a long time for you to dry out
<1> gas evaporates faster
<0> but leaves a smell on you
<1> no, it leaves a smell on you, not on me
<4> http://www.valvehacks.zaccum.com/ - great cs dod hl2 (valve) hacks
<5> is there a known problem with ati motherboard and redhat el?
<5> because both fedora and rhel run very slowly
<6> Anil, What version of RHEL ? and an ATI motherboard?? Full model number and a link to it's specs please :)
<5> give me a sec, and I will get it all
<5> it's RHEL 4
<5> .2
<6> Is it x86_64 ?
<5> no, it's i386, but yes, my processor is athlon64 3200
<5> what do I grep for in dmesg for my mother board?
<6> Anil, Nothing. lspci may show a few things. What we need is a link to the actuall mobo's specs.
<6> Anil, See you in #fedora. Better off discussing in one place.
<5> mutk - here are the results for my lspci
<5> http://pastebin.ca/39199
<6> Anil, Discuss in #fedora. Not here.
<5> ok
<7> hello!
<7> your all dead
<7> *cries* all alone
<8> hello all
<3> hi
<3> for the hell of it, i'm trying to install the fedora legacy stuff into an old redhat 8.0 box.
<3> i know it's suspended, and that's ok as long as the paks are somewhat newer
<3> hwoever the site says "apt" is not finished in big red. does this mean i can't use apt at all?
<2> kreg_lt: it means that we have apt metadata there, but no specific apt package for you to use. If you already ahve apt, feel free to use it.
<3> can i setup apt on the rh8 box to use the fedoralegacy paks to the point of where they were suspeded?
<2> yep
<9> you can setup apt or yum on rh8
<3> trying to setup apt on a old messed up rh8 box. i could just reinstall, but what fun is that....
<3> does rpm have an upgrade tag? i'm trying to update glibc-common so that i can install apt according to the commands on the fedoralegacy site
<9> rpm -Uhv
<9> it's generally best to use -U instead of -i whether installing or upgrading
<3> ya tried that earlier. dunno if it's a good idea
<3> glibc < 2.3.2 conflicts with glibc-common-2.3.2-4.80.8
<3> that newer glibc is from the fedoralegacy site
<9> better off doing it with yum or apt if you can
<3> ya,
<3> just trying to get one or two in >: )
<3> http://www.fedoralegacy.org/docs/apt-rh8.php
<3> the first set of commands for the apt prerequisites
<3> said glibc needed soemthing
<3> ahh here it is
<3> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.2) is needed by rpm-4.1.1-1.8x
<3> not sure how to approach that one
<9> try yum instead
<9> if yum goes in easy, you can fix glibc and install apt later if you prefer it
<3> ok, trying yum
<3> i think it's because the newer rpm was built against that version
<9> I'm sure
<3> darn
<3> same thing
<3> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.2) is needed by rpm-4.1.1-1.8x
<3> anyone know the redhat archive url? there was a url where they keep everything old. i thought it was something like archive.download.redhat.com
<2> kreg_lt: I don't believe there was a yum for the original RHL8
<2> kreg_lt: you could try getting the updated glibc and rpm and rpmlibs from http://download.fedoralegacy.org/redhat/8/updates/i386/
<9> I thought there was at freshrpms.net
<9> they used to have apt and yum both for rh8
<3> f13, ya i was trying to do rpm -Uhv on those newer fedoralegacy rpm's for glibc, but i got that erroer above
<3> i'm not sure a standard glibc is even installed on this box.
<3> actually i'm not very familiar with an rpm distro
<3> what if i just go back to the original discs, and do a typical rpm -U of the glibc rpm?
<10> hi, anyone know the release date of redhat v. 6.1 ?
<10> noo, 6.3
<3> holy fark
<3> needed by...... is needed by......is needed by
<3> i just wanna update glibc
<3> so simple
<3> what does an rpm system tell me when it says this?
<3> error: Failed dependencies:
<3> popt = 1.7 is needed by (installed) rpm-4.1-1.06
<3> if that is the only failed dependency, what is the problem? it's claiming it's installed
<10> you want update it over rpm?
Return to
#redhat
or
Go to some related
logs:
gentoo ALi Corporation High Definition Audio/AC'97
apt-get install ajunta
rinz.com
cacti bash scrips
#lisp
bluflops
#python
#perl
mysql_query stored procedure
|
|