| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5
Comments:
<0> i got loads of UDP
<1> so i should be safe?
<2> yeah. if you trust win98, yes.
<0> dignome: i got loads of UDP from all kinds of ip addresses
<1> so, should I do qemu -hda /dev/hda or qemu -hda /dev/hda1?
<1> after making a hardware profile?
<2> per the faq use /dev/hda
<1> thanks for the help dignome
<0> dignome: on br0 i can only see DISCOVER , on eth1 i can see DISCOVER/OFFER
<2> Shahid: sorry to leave you hanging, but i really must go. maybe someone in here with more network know-how can help...
<0> thanks for all your help
<0> i'm giving up anyway :)
<3> i have networking issues as well
<3> freebsd host with tap and bridge
<3> qemu guest can access the host but not the whole network
<3> tcpdump on tap interface shows arp requests from guest
<3> but no respose
<3> i can even see those arp packets on the physical interface
<3> any ideas?
<4> rdnzl: can you actually seem them on something else on the lan that the physical interface is connected to?
<3> i have nothing but the gateway on this segment and thats a monowall where i cannot really do anything but read the logs
<3> could it be a problem that it is a wireless link?
<5> Yes.
<5> You can't bridge wireless networks.
<3> ah. i suspected so
<6> hello
<4> pbrook: well you can...
<5> murb: How?
<4> if you are in master mode you can bridge a wired to a wireless segment.
<4> i'm using it in the house here with the hostap driver.
<5> That's different.
<4> pbrook: it is only things in managed / adhoc who can't send the wrong mac address out
<4> because the mac address part of the protocol.
<4> rdnzl: if you are only using ip using proxy arp instead.
<4> wds links have 2 sets on src and desination mac addresses to get around that problem also.
<3> i'll work around this using a wired interface now ;)
<3> thanks for the input
<7> pbrook: are names like RealView, Versatile, trademarks? do you think there's any risk of getting sued for claiming to emulate some machine and giving its full name or manufacturer's in the sources and in what "-M ?" shows?
<7> actually i can remove it from everywhere in the sources but it would be good if the user can get some descriptive name at least with "-M ?" and i guess it should be mentioned in the docs
<4> this is a simulation of "whatever foobar(tm)" is just a statement of fac.
<4> t
<5> Right. I think we're of to use the trademarked names, because we're using them nomaitatively (ie. to refer to the genuine product).
<5> IANAL, but I think saying "we emulate a Pentium(TM) processor." is ok, but renaming qemu to "Pentium" is not.
<7> hmm good point
<0> hi dignome, i got it working, put tan0 and eth1 in promisc mode, and set all including br0 "0.0.0.0"
<0> then run dhcpcd eth0 inside qemu
<0> i was running it outside like so many guides told me :/
<1> is dignome there?
<8> hi. i can't get tap networking to work with debian etch. the /etc/qemu-ifup script is never run. neithr with -net nic -net tap nor with -net nic -net tap,script=/etc/qemu-ifup
<0> is it chmod +x ?
<8> the script? sure. i can execute it as a user
<0> quitte: any error message?
<8> warning: could not configure /dev/net/tun: no virtual network emulation
<0> modprobe tun
<8> the user has rw permission for /dev/net/tun. did that
<8> etc/qemu-ifup is the default,right? maybe i should try a binary from the qemu homepage. looks lik a bug in the debian package to me. i added a echo blabla line to the script to be sure if it is run or not.
<0> i'm not sure, but do you still need root permissions ?
<8> there is a sudo command in the script. and im in sudoers. i also tried running qemu with sudo. doesn't help
<8> it's th same with the qemu binary from the homepage
<9> pbrook, has qemu-system-armeb ever been tested with linux? and if so, how, as I cannot find BE patches for either supported sub-arch
<5> It has not been tested, and almost certainly doesn't work.
<9> pbrook, ok thanks
<5> Some of the emulated hardware is theoretically capable of running in big-endian mode, but qemu probably gets it wrong, and I don't know if linux supports it.
<9> so far farthest I have gotten is "uncompressing kernel...done."
<9> :-)
<5> Makes sense.
<10> moin
<9> I've run BE with softgun, but that has a kernel patch for the ns9750 sub-arch
<9> and softgun is rather slow
<5> IIRC on real Integrator hardware some of the peripherals/busses are still little-endian
<9> ARM site claims the real hardware can run BE
<5> Right, but that's only the cpu core.
<9> but it's common to have to deal with that - we run the nslu2, nas100d, etc in LE and BE
<9> I thought they claimed the integrator eval board could run in BE but not positive now
<8> does tap networking with qemu-0.8.2 work for anyone here?
<5> jacques: Yes, the CPU can run BE, but you have to byteswap accesses to some of the peripherals.
<9> yes, true
<9> but that's doable
<5> I'd bet either or both of qemu and the kenrel get it wrong.
<5> Sure, it's doable, it's just not done :-)
<9> is there a way to debug these things with qemu - as when porting a kernel to a new platform and using a bdi2000 ?
<5> Yes. Use the gdb interface.
<9> ah of course - thanks
<8> hmm now it works as root im pretty sure it didn't earlier. and it shouldnt require being run as root.
<11> hi
<11> someone can help me with a memory problen on qemu please?
<1> could you be a bit more specific?
<11> CharminTheMoose: I have xp installed on a virtual machine
<1> right...
<11> now I would like to install .NET on this virtual machine but when I try to install it I have an error saying that I dont have the minimum memory
<0> are you using ? -m
<11> I try with -m 512,768 and -no-kqemu and nothing
<11> Shahid: CharminTheMoose
<1> ?
<11> CharminTheMoose: do you have any ideas to resolve my problem?
<11> hi
<11> which was the person that he/she has been helpming me?
<11> or someone can help me with a memory problem
<7> it was CharminTheMoose but he left
<10> i doubt its a memory problem if you already tried -m 768...
<11> balrog-kun: can you help me?
<7> i'm afraid nope
<11> nox-: can you help me?
<10> not really, maybe .net is just incompatible with qemu
<12> sorry, interrupting in the middle of the discussion, what's the problem?
<11> Im trying to install :NEt and the installer has 530Mb . I need a partition with more than 530, isnt it? the_hydra
<12> so, the problem is, you don't such that big partition?
<12> or did I misunderstand something here?
<12> don't have, I meant
<11> I have a memory problem when I try to execute the installer of .NET to resolve this I would like to know the answer to this question?
<12> can you explain what do you mean by "memory problem"?
<12> segfault?
<12> crash?
<11> no enough memory
<12> and how much do you set on -m parameter?
<11> mount -t tmpfs -o size=628m none /dev/shm
<11> qemu footer.img -cdrom /dev/cdrom -m 612
<11> like this th
<11> the_hydra:
<12> hm ok
<12> and you have confirmed that the guest does "see" 612 MB of RAM?
<12> via top or free, maybe...
<11> no
<12> now that is strange
<12> how much did you see?
<11> with a partition of 628mb can I execute a program of 530mb?
<12> partition? or memory?
<11> none 628M 0 628M 0% /dev/shm
<11> with df -h
<12> inside the guest, I mean
<12> what is the result of running "free" inside the guest?
<6> the_hydra: the quiest is XP :)
<12> use task manager, maybe?
<12> or sysinternal's tool such process explorer...
<11> for me the_hydra?
<6> aitiba: it may help if you compare .NET requirements with what is reported by XP, then complain here
<12> aitiba: the guest is Windows? well, I just suggested that to make sure that your guest does indeed see the correct amount of simulated RAM
<11> the_hydra: ok thanks
<12> aitiba: np
<13> hello
<13> it is possible to make qemu emulated os be available via real network ?
<12> you need bridging IIRC
<10> or -redir
<13> where I can read about IIRC ?
<12> no no
<12> IIRC is IRC acronym, dude
<13> what?:)
<13> hehe ,)
<12> If I Remember Correctly
<13> I want make honeypots with qemu
Return to
#qemu
or
Go to some related
logs:
iptables --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
ubuntu 4gb ram
lightkey
ZOND3D
switch from gnome to xfce +fedora
IPTABLES Bad Policy
haiku 0x9090
suse kdrc
dnt amarok
#centos
|
|