| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Comments:
<0> Ceran: It's not necesarily python, but I think it's simple
<1> Hello, anybody know why subprocess.Popen() lets me enter keyboard input into the running program?
<2> elventear: Yeah, I was hoping for more of a sole Python lib though.
<3> HellDragon: as soon as money is involved, the incentive for a would-be attacker rises quickly. Just look how many commercial software packages there are with unbroken key algorithms. I wouldn't know of one.
<4> :(
<1> For example, I run Popen on a command like p***wd, and it lets the USER type stuff into it, rather than letting me proc.stdin.write()?
<3> HellDragon: Which brings us to the eternal question: what would you like to do?
<0> Ceran: yapgvb is Yet Another Graphviz Python Binding
<4> nothing i justed wanted to know, Blackb|rd
<3> HellDragon: Ah, well, now you do :)
<4> yes ty
<5> lws: popen2?
<3> HellDragon: np. And GPL'ing software is *so* much easier! :)
<1> quotemstr: those are depreciated in favor of subprocess.Popen aren't they?
<1> deprecated.
<5> lws: RHEL4 still uses Python 2.3, so I still use popen2./
<6> What is wrong with this? "y = 0; for y < height:" Python doesn't like my syntax
<1> quotemstr: oh
<1> quotemstr: You understand my problem, yes?
<3> oliverp: because it's not valid Python :-P
<5> lws: Yes. It's because stdin is still connected.
<1> hm
<3> oliverp: I guess you want to loop over all integers between 0 and height?
<5> lws: If you use popen2, you can control the standard input.
<1> quotemstr: Why would it ever BECOME connected is the question.
<5> lws: Because fork() creates a copy of the file descriptor table.
<3> oliverp: Python doesn't know by how much to increment per loop, for one.
<7> lws: you want stdin=subprocess.PIPE as argument to Popen()
<5> And stdin usually isn't close-on-exec.
<1> quotemstr: You can do that with Popen as well, supposedly.
<7> lws: because the docu say so :)
<1> ChrisLong: Yeah I have that. :)
<5> Again, I haven't used subprocess.
<5> It might be better.
<3> oliverp: second, for takes generators (and similar) objects to get its values from.
<1> quotemstr: well, thank you for your help :)
<5> The principle remains the same.
<1> ChrisLong: are you familiar with the subprocess module?
<7> lws: ok, then
<8> alright, now back to the split thing
<3> oliverp: third, you either wnat to use while-loops (incremeting is done by your code) or you want to use a generator like xrange()
<8> what if there is nothing to split?
<9> frustrating documentation
<7> lws: sorry, no, only using the docu
<9> psycopg2 docs refer to it as psycopg.
<1> ChrisLong: hmm
<3> bkjones: frustrating docs is no good: it usually frustrates back ;)
<9> yeah
<1> ChrisLong: maybe take a look? http://deadbeefbabe.org/paste/663
<9> they started it!
<10> lws what about subprocess?
<2> elventear: I also saw pydot, although it's so out of date their website doesn't even point to the current graphviz site.
<1> rlo: It seems to be connecting stdin when I don't want it to be.
<7> lws: mount is not using stdin, it's using the terminal directly
<0> Ceran: So, yapgvb not good enough? I've never used them, FYI
<1> ChrisLong: 0_o
<1> ChrisLong: Well how do I get it to knock that off?
<1> ChrisLong: I don't want to p*** the p***word via the command line arguments. I seriously doubt it overwrites it's argv so you can't look at ps and grab the p***word.
<2> elventear: I'm trying it out now. It looks like an active project.
<7> lws: maybe pty.spawn does what you want
<1> ChrisLong: Do you happen to know if mount overwrites argv when it loads?
<11> hi guys
<6> Blackb|rd, haha. Yeah okay. Thanks a lot for the explanation. :-)
<7> lws: don't know
<11> if i wanted to create a structure like this...
<8> hrm... anyone? if i'm trying to do s1,s2 = s.split(".") but s DOES NOT have a ".", how do i keep it from faulting?
<11> array[0].flag=1
<1> ChrisLong: thanks for the tip on pty.* looks like what I need.
<11> array[1].checked=0
<11> is it possible
<7> lws: you're welcome
<2> elventear: heh, it appears to require jpeg.dll on windows, and I don't have that.
<7> AfterDeath: use t=s.split(".") and check the length of t
<8> and...?
<8> ooo
<8> i get it
<8> t[0] and t[1] yes?
<12> any idea of why a module that is unimported may not free all its memory?
<1> AfterDeath: You could also run s.search(".") or whatever first
<1> AfterDeath: ChrisLong's method is more effecient though.
<8> ChrisLong's idea sounds easier
<13> AfterDeath, ChrisLong:why not just use a try: ?
<14> AfterDeath, if '.' in s: s1, s2 = s.split('.')
<8> ooook
<8> thats the best solution yet
<14> Why not write a cl***? o.o;
<8> i'll go with that
<1> AfterDeath: Not really, because you search the string twice for .
<8> easiest implementation, tho
<1> true.
<11> anyone got any ideas how I'd implement a struc ture like that
<1> cbx33: say what? Did you have an original message?
<1> cbx33: oh way up there.
<6> When adding a ',' in the end of a print statement, the "\n"-character is left out. But instead I get a whitespace character (' '). Is there a way to skip that character as well?
<11> hehe
<11> lws, thanks
<1> cbx33: a cl***, i think hashes are accessible via the '.' operator in python also.
<11> lws can you give me an example
<11> a cl*** that doesn't have functions?
<1> cbx33: Sure, why not? Somebody say a cl*** had to have a function?
<11> no
<11> do you have time to mock up a wuick example
<11> I'm not sure how that would be implemented
<11> I'm pretty knew to python
<1> cbx33: hang on, i'm not a pythone expert.
<11> no but it should be simple rihgt ;)
<2> What kind of python lib requires java.dll?
<1> cbx33: here we go
<11> :D
<1> cbx33: cl*** Foo:
<1> bar = "temp"
<1> foo = Foo()
<1> foo.bar = "test"
<1> print foo.bar
<1> crap
<1> cbx33: http://deadbeefbabe.org/paste/664
<11> ok i see
<1> cbx33: http://www.lib.uchicago.edu/keith/courses/python/cl***/5/
<11> thknas
<11> lws, that gets me the a.p style
<11> but what about having several of them
<11> a[x].p
<1> cbx33: that would be a list of cl***es.
<11> ok so
<11> mounted=cl****5
<11> mounted=[cl***]*5
<1> cbx33: i = [Foo() for x in range(10)]
<11> cool thanks
<11> :(
<11> :)
<1> ?
<11> sorry lws wrong channel
<11> lws, would it be possible to extend that
<11> how would the cl*** be modified for
<1> cbx33: to what?
<11> j.info.name
<11> would i create a cl*** called info
<11> with the .name
<11> then j would be a cl*** suing .info
<1> yes
<11> I get it
<1> You'd need another structure/cl***
<15> every dot counts
<1> Every dot counts, in small amounts.. Doot doot doot... doo doo doo.
<15> does anyone know of any (even limited) word processors written in python that are extendable?
<14> Leo
<15> that doesnt look like a word processor
<15> maybe i should just download the Office 12 beta
<16> hi
<15> hi
Return to
#python
or
Go to some related
logs:
qam 256 decrypt comcast
#perl
#kde
Counting hexadecimal
#physics
no-sources amd64
#physics
/dev/hci* hcitool ubuntu
dvd decrption
ptp plugdev problem gentoo
|
|