| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Comments:
<0> any manual that sures works?
<1> ah crap
<2> s/maildir/maildir and sql/
<1> sorry we use courier
<1> not cyrus
<0> to configure a imap mail server
<3> http://workaround.org/articles/ispmail-sarge/#pop3imap
<3> worked for me very fine until i installed sqwebmail....
<2> sqwebmail is simply a Web-based MUA which reads local maildirs.
<3> yep, but regular authentication fails
<3> now
<4> So it limiting the size of my active queue a good idea?
<4> Or will it have no effect since the message goes through spam******in before hitting the incoming queue?
<5> How do I tell when an email has been opened on a recipients machine without using the usual receipts?
<2> If installing a MUA breaks your SMTP AUTH, you have a Debian packaging problem. If it breaks your IMAP authentication, it might also be a packaging problem, but is not related to Postfix.
<2> pinks, so you have access to that recipient's machine? If not, there is no way.
<2> s/so/Do/
<5> A form filled in on a website seems to have an ability to tell when it was read without using receipts
<4> Hmm, or maybe putting a limit on the process limit for the spam******in service in master.cf?
<5> How can I tell when an email was delivered without using receipts
<6> pinks: some shady characters like to do pixel tracking.
<2> pinks: your logs will indicate whether or not the next MTA down the line got it.
<5> rob0: is there anyway I can automate that checking?
<2> If the next MTA is a relayhost, that's useless. If it's the recipient's MX, it still doesn't prove that it was delivered to the user.
<5> lunaphyte_ I'd rather keep this above board ;-)
<5> rob0: that's what I was afraid of
<6> pinks: good
<5> nut I would like to set up a per-user automatic delivery report system
<6> in that case, there's really no way to know when someone opens your email. all you can do is what rob0 said, and note what time it was handed off to nexthop
<5> I'm just looking for delivery to the addressee - not opening or "read" reports
<6> that sounds feasible
<6> ***uming nexthop is the recipient's mx
<5> lunaphyte_ - that'sa big ***umption ;-)
<6> not that big. at least it's something you have a reasonable amount of control over.
<5> apart from the forwarding that they have set up for themselves
<5> lunaphyte_ any hints on how to automate the report of delivery to the next hop?
<2> pflogsumm might be a start, or might even be all you need.
<6> yeah.. /join #bash ;)
<5> ????
<2> oh heck no, that would be too difficult in bash, you need perl or python.
<6> fine fine... /join #perl :)
<2> :)
<5> :-(
<0> please, could some one give me some help?
<2> Blackhold: SASL_README.html for AUTH in Postfix.
<0> where?
<2> Generally the first place I look for information about $PROJECT is http://www.$PROJECT.org/ :)
<6> mickey?
<2> http://www.postfix.org/
<0> I'd followed this and in 5.2 point I have blocked -> http://bulma.net/body.phtml?nIdNotica=2153
<0> I'd followed this and in 5.2 point I have blocked -> http://bulma.net/body.phtml?nIdNotica=2163 *
<2> Wow, I think I just crashed that machine
<6> rob0: what'd you do!!
<2> no, it's still up :)
<2> http://bulma.net/body.phtml?nIdNotica=2153
<6> phew.
<6> **** trickery...
<2> cute 404 :)
<6> er - s/****/such/
<2> ataraid ... yuck. I'd use software RAID before ataraid.
<7> someone could tell me if the syntax of mailbox_transport_maps and virtual_mailbox_maps is the same?
<2> frop, I doubt it, but if I were you I would look them both up in postconf.5.html .
<7> rob0 i've already look at it...
<7> ...there're no examples
<2> postconf.5.html#mailbox_transport_maps doesn't exist :)
<7> mailbox_transport_maps (default: empty)
<7> Optional lookup tables with per-recipient message delivery transports to use for local(8) mailbox delivery, whether or not the recipients are found in the UNIX p***wd database.
<2> hmmm, is this an older version?
<7> no...it's from 2.3
<2> or new within the last month :)
<7> This feature is available in Postfix 2.3 and later.
<2> I'm on 20051223
<7> heh
<2> time to upgrade? :)
<7> i'm just try to figure out, how to use some UNIX account throught virtual mapped user
<7> well user@virtual.tdl sends to user@localhost
<7> ...using maps
<7> ...and if i should user local transport or not
<2> well, I think I generally understand how things work in Postfix, and a transport map would have a transport name as the lookup value.
<7> like?
<2> A user lookup ( virtual_mailbox_maps ) would have an ignored lookup value.
<2> So, dual usage sounds possible to me.
<7> mmmh
<2> See transport.5.html for format of a transport lookup.
<7> you're saying me that a think like: "usr@virtual.tdl dir.virtual.tld/usr/Maildir/" in virtual_mailbox_maps, doen't return the directory?
<7> for virtual_mailbox_maps, i'm intendig a virtual_mailbox_maps.db file
<2> oops, you are right.
<2> <== has not done a virtual(8) setup
<7> :P
<8> anyone got some experience with maildrop and more advanced checking?
<9> Hi can I ask a question about rejecting emails ?
<6> please... no email related questions here. :p
<9> :'(
<2> :)
<9> err ok
<8> hehe
<9> i'll reword it
<9> ha
<2> whew
<10> reword it less meta :)
<9> im trying to reject 'things' sent to me. that say that eg they are from hotmail but the header shows a weird server like .. from recepcion (77.red-217-125-46.staticip.rima-tde.net [217.125.46.77])
<9> which im ***uming isnt hotmail at all,
<2> right
<9> is this spoofing ?
<2> SMTPD_ACCESS_README.html is a good start. So is Jim Seymour's cheat sheet.
<9> ok, I will read those ones
<11> Oh, and Ralf Hildebrandt's RESTRICTION_CL***_README examples
<11> and IIRC, the monkeys.org Postrfix config example
<9> right
<2> is that still available?
<9> its the first step in trying to clear my logs chasing a trojan :(
<11> rob0 dunno
<11> monstamac block port 25 outbound from everything except your mta
<9> yep
<9> i think its using it
<9> im trying to chase through the logs to find out where its coming from
<12> hello
<11> lo
<13> f3ew?
<11> Vladdie ?
<13> hmmm.... I guess I rahter should go to courier since it's an IMAP question ^^
<13> sorry f3ew for highlighting you ^^
<2> weird ... I just saw a stray connection to smtpd from localhost ... no one else logged in, and I didn't do it.
<2> <== worried
<12> rob0: perhaps a failed cronjob?
<11> rob0 see netstat?
<12> or something like this, a local service
<11> ceegee shouldn't connect to smtpd
<12> f3ew: okay, was just an idea :)
<11> nagios?
<2> I don't remember this: tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:2501 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 669/perl
<9> hmmm it has just occurred to me that maybe the worm/trojan isnt using the mta
<9> according to cbl blacklist
<9> 62.3.253.7 was found to be using several different names during multiple
<9> connections on or about:
<9> 2006:01:30 ~12:00 UTC+/- 15 minutes.
<9> The names seen included:
<9> wlu.ca,alexanders.net,fnboneida.com,email.csd.org.tw,g-atelier.com
<2> 127.0.0.1:2501 127.0.0.1:2754 ESTABLISHED 669/perl and 127.0.0.1:2754 127.0.0.1:2501 ESTABLISHED 29989/smtpd
<9> are on the emails coming from my system
<10> So what's process 669, already? :)
<14> amavis?
<2> checking
<2> no
<15> hey guys. im currently following a postfix tutorial, could someone tell me how to populate the mysql forward table?
<15> http://workaround.org/articles/ispmail-sarge/
<15> im following this
<2> whew ... sqlgrey ... I forgot :)
<10> haha
<10> o noes!
Return to
#postfix
or
Go to some related
logs:
Cannot find Tcl configuration definitions
#web
#php
mindphuck
suckerfish fails on IE 7 beta 3
t60 cdrecord
javascript compare cookies
#linux
#perl
igp 340 3d dapper
|
|