| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Comments:
<0> how do I clear out my grey list cache?
<1> no idea
<0> with postfix enabled I'm still getting the headers.. lemme enable amavisd-new
<0> even with amavisd-new enabled they're there.. lemme see if moving them to/from an outlook folder is what removed the headers.
<0> That's what did it.. movving it to an outlook folder removed the header.
<1> thats not really a problem, that means spam******ins is able to process them
<0> I guess I'll run e-mails through spam******in -t before I move them over.
<0> wonder why outlook removes the headers.
<1> maybe outlook chops up the file? in outlook you can view those headers
<0> guess I'll have to wait till I get another spam e-mail to see what spam******in is seeing.
<1> your amavisd log will show you what rules an email trips
<1> tests=[BAYES_99=3.5, DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX=2.02, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.3, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135, PYZOR_CHECK=3.7, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.558, RCVD_IN_CBL=1, RCVD_IN_XBL=3.897, URIBL_AB_SURBL=3.812, URIBL_BLACK=3, URIBL_JP_SURBL=4.087, URIBL_OB_SURBL=3.008, URIBL_SC_SURBL=4.498, URIBL_WS_SURBL=2.14]
<0> where's the log file?
<1> thats from my amavisd log
<1> you have to set it, i think by default its syslog
<1> $log_level = 2;
<1> $DO_SYSLOG = 0;
<1> $LOGFILE = "$MYHOME/amavis.log";
<2> anyone know how the hell I can get Postfix to stop complaining that my mailbox is a symlink, or hardlinked more than once ?
<2> I don't keep large files in ~, but I see no way to put them in another folder. I can't hard or softlink them
<2> and it keeps giving out the full path to my mailbox to anyone e-mailing me, quite insecure
<3> don't do that
<3> Maildir/
<2> "I don't keep large files in ~"
<2> besides, PINE does not support maildir format
<2> but that doesn't answer either of my questions
<4> Regardless of where your mailbox is, tell Postfix to use the mailbox and not a symlink to it. Use .forward if it's just for you.
<2> I need to make Postfix stop checking if ~/.mailbox is a symlink. that is not a security risk, but Postfix thinks it is.
<4> Well, you've got the source. Good luck!
<2> what do I put in .forward ?
<4> The path to the mailbox
<2> I thought forward was used to forward to other mail accounts ?
<2> why does Postfix believe that hardlinked or softlinked mailboxes are a security risk ? they are both owned by my user, created by my user
<4> You'd have to ask Wietse what he was thinking, but he's active on the mailing list. Anyhow, postfix .forward works like sendmail .forward, basically.
<2> my computer is my mail server. I don't want any personal files in the unencrypted partition where GNU/Linux is installed, I want them in the encrypted user home dirs. if .forward works to point to another mailbox, then its fine
<5> morning
<2> .forward worked
<2> thank you
<6> please help me out with this error, I am tryign to set up postfix
<6> please help me out with this error, http://pastebin.ca/57776 I am tryign to set up postfix+sal2
<7> What do you folks think of horde+imp ?
<6> it's cool
<8> Pegger: what Postfix version is this?
<5> I'm running postfix, and getting some mail thru but slowly
<5> a portscan says 25 is closed
<5> this doesnt really make much sense to me
<5> anyone know where I should be looking to enable this?
<6> **** how can i get the version number?
<8> postconf mail_version
<6> the trusty postfix -v is not a option at least for getting version numbers
<6> mail_version = 2.1.5
<8> My guess, then, is that your patched Postfix didn't support smtpd_tls_received_header.
<6> rob0, why do you say it is patched?
<8> larryone: netstat(8) to tell you what's listening (or not, as it sounds.) Headers and logs tell you what path a message took. Also see below:
<8> !debug
<9> rob0: 'debug' : http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html : a good starting point for how to deal with problems and to report information to those who might help. Post your information in a pastebin such as http://pastebin.com/ or http://rafb.net/paste/ .
<8> Pegger, TLS support was added in 2.2.
<6> do I need at least version 2.2 to do sasl2?
<8> I wouldn't know.
<6> I want to be able to relay through my mail server
<5> netstat seems to be telling it's listening on 25
<5> =0(
<5> grrr
<10> In /var/spool/postfix/private I have a bunch of world writeable files like uucp= and trace= and relay= and stuff like that... any ideas what these are for?
<4> Those are sockets, not files
<4> That's what the components of postfix use to communicate with each other.
<4> They're not world-accessible, so it doesn't matter that they're world-writable (but sockets are anyhow).
<4> (Note the directory permissions)
<4> btw, the "=" isn't part of the file name. You've got an alias for "ls" that p***es the "-F" or "-p" option, that adds characters to the end of filenames to show you what kind of files they are, and "=" means socket, same way executables get a "*".
<5> 0 *.25 *.* LISTEN
<5> =0(
<10> Ahh ok.
<10> So can I chmod them so that its not world writeable anyhow?
<11> is the line "smtpd_tls_CAfile" a must for self generated certificates to work?
<11> !550
<9> magyar: Error: "550" is not a valid command.
<11> where can i get the "reject code" list for postfix?
<11> !reject code
<9> magyar: Error: "reject" is not a valid command.
<12> anyone using scalix?
<13> keanne: Not I. Although, I hear good things.
<12> ek, i see. also, i meant postfix with scalix, by default it uses sendmail
<12> and i dont want to use sendmail, no sir!
<13> keanne: Yeah. I knew what you meant. But, no. I haven't touch Scalix yet. I don't use Linux and they haven't ported to BSD yet. So, bleh.
<12> ek, I am forced to use rpm based distro because of this myself, the only linux distro i am using is slackware. im a bsd user myself too :-)
<13> Hehe. I enjoy Slack probably more than any other distrobution of Linux. Although, I haven't played with Gentoo, Debian, or SuSE much. Those seem to be among the most popular.
<13> I just haven't seen a reason to use Linux being as BSD does everything Linux does plus more. Seems a bit redundant.
<8> ek: Opposite for me. :) One thing I need is zaptel hardware support (Asterisk PBX), which is better in Linux. So I stay Slack, no plans to mess with BSD.
<8> I'm also very comfortable with Linux netfilter / iptables firewalling.
<12> yup, diffrent strokes for different folks, havent been comfortable for netfilter even though i have used linux for years, im using pf for all of my firewalls.
<13> rob0: Seems fair. I've far too familiar with BSD to know turd about Linux's firewalling/iptables.
<13> s/I've/I'm/g
<13> But, hey. That's what friends are for. :P
<12> lol, correct
<14> hi all, how do i setup courier-pop to authenticate correctly when we do a virtual mail box setting in postfix? I searched google, but nothing consistent.
<13> kbitter: Check the postfixwiki.
<13> There should be more than enough information there for your setup.
<14> ek: i went there, but i found docs explaining a courier + mysql setup. I need a courier + system account setup to support virtual domains with virtual mail boxes
<15> What is the difference between canonical addresses and aliases?
<16> I cant seem to get spam******in working... I end up with a mail loop, and as far as I can tell, thats normal
<14> hi all, how do i setup courier-pop to authenticate correctly when we do a virtual mail box setting in postfix to use system accounts? I searched google, but nothing consistent.
<12> interferon, canonical basically is address rewriting
<15> keanne, Right, but doesn't the aliases file provide the same services?
<12> a big no... alias only redirects
<12> and redirect is different from rewrite
<15> how?
<12> did you read the docs?
<15> i'm reading postfix: the definitive guide
<15> but what is the difference between redirecting to an address and rewriting the address?
<12> "The canonical(5) mapping is not to be confused with local
<12> aliasing. Use the aliases(5) map for that purpose."
<15> keanne, that's not helpful
<12> interferon, no offense, but i am failing to see where you got confused.
<12> english is not my primary language, so please dont be offended with what i said
<15> i said "how does rewriting differ from redirecting?" but that quote simply says "rewriting is different from redirecting"
<15> it only begs the question
<14> hi all, i really want to let my mail client user to authenticate as "user@domain.tld" instead of just using "user" on account settings. I seted postfix up as described in virtual_readme at postfix.org. im using courier-pop on debian sarge.
<17> does anyone know of a way to strip incoming messages of their attachment and place it into some folder?
<17> using postfix native tools that is
<18> when sending out a mailing to several thousand customers using a postfix server, could anyone tell me if there are certain options/caveats I should be aware of?
<19> choongii: how many thousand?
<18> 2494
<17> your isp might wonder about that much traffic and think you are a spammer
<18> okay, thanks overrider
<19> yeah, but the server shouldn't even break a sweat on anything newer that a p200
<18> ooh :) ok, good news
<18> thanks guys :)
<19> what are you using to send them?
<18> I'm not sure yet, but I think I'll write a php script which uses `sendmail`
<16> hmm... with procmail, why do I need to seem to put ${MAILDIR}/cur instead of just ${MAILDIR} ?
<16> nm, need a trailing slash aparently
<20> Idle - are u using imap?
<21> hm, I added luser=jeffz in my main.cf to do the catch all, I have relay_host=my.isps.mailserver, when I send a test email and check my mail.info, it shows it receiving it and then sending it onto jeffz but with relay=my.isps.mailserver, how can it tell it that i'm local?
<22> jeffz: you mean how to tell Postfix that a certain domain is a local domain? -> mydestination
<21> ChrisH: hm, already set.. http://rafb.net/paste/results/sknabo36.html
<23> How can I setup a catch-all email address (I want all mail sent to a non-existent user to be delivered to an existing cyrus user) ?
<21> that's what i'm trying to figure out
<23> (and I don't use/need virtual domains)
<21> i have to use relayhost otherwise my mail gets rejected because of dns blacklisting but when i use it it relays for non-existant users through the relayhost even though i specified 'jeffz' in luser_relay
<22> jeffz: hitler.kim-jong-il.org is not listed as a local domain in $mydestination
<22> retro_neo: Set the "luser_relay".
<21> ah ha, excellent
<21> thanks ChrisH
<23> ChrisH: can I just put an email address in there?
<21> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#luser_relay
<24> hello all
<24> why i have this error? postconf: fatal: /etc/postfix/main.cf, line 737: missing '=' after attribute name: "check_sender_access mysql:/etc/postfix/restricted_senders"
<24> where is problem? i see documentation and tehere is all ok
<22> Antixrict: how does line 737 look?
Return to
#postfix
or
Go to some related
logs:
#kde
#gentoo
opera usr/share/ malformatted
gentoo-sources compared vanilla sources
#linux
#gentoo
javascript dom create applet
debian debian-sys-maint access denied mysql
avermedia hybrid ubuntu
#perl
|
|