@# Quotes DB     useful, funny, interesting





Google
 
Web www.quotesdb.info
Undernet  |  EFnet  |  Quakenet  |  Freenode  |  Dalnet  |  Ircnet  |  Galaxynet
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7



Comments:

<0> ahh.
<0> is that read only?
<1> yes
<2> Sieg, keanne: OMFG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111!!!!!
<2> Found it, with help from keanne's link posted above \o/
<3> _cosmos_: good :) what was it?
<3> I'm having a worse error than I thought now on mine, so I didn't even check here in a while. heh
<2> Sieg: path mtu discovery! Disabled path mtu discovery on my system, works like a charm now
<3> nice
<2> Sieg: will have to check whether it is my own firewall or some other that is blocking the "ICMP must fragment" return packets
<4> f3ew?
<1> yes?
<5> I asked yesterday about procmail blacklist filtering... well it still doesn't work but now I have another idea... instead of doing through procmail, can some kind of recipient blacklist be setup and have a mail bounced instead?
<5> in postfix?
<6> _cosmos_: since it only happened after you became double natted, that NAT for the 10.0.0.0/8 network is most probably to blame
<1> Vlad check_recipient_acess



<1> Vlad check_recipient_access
<5> and probably the more difficult question is, could it be user-specific be setup?
<5> ^^
<1> restriction cl***
<1> or policy daemon
<5> ok, thx :) then I'll have a look at that :)
<2> wols_: I'm sharpening my knives since the 10/8 responsibles were 100% certain it was my fault :D <- iiiivil grin
<5> could also spam******in be used to bounce mail on a postfix level?
<2> postfix and amavisd rocks
<1> Vlad no
<5> too bad
<5> instead of sending spams with a score 10 to /dev/null (as I do now) I thought it could be better to bounce them back
<7> there is another choice (or a better one) than Amavisd-new?
<5> check_recipient_access seems to be pretty much straight forward :) thank you for your help
<1> Vlad ewwwwwwww
<1> reject, but don't bounce
<3> f3ew: hi! how's it going?
<3> heh, not better than that?
<5> why not bouncing @ f3ew?
<8> f3ew: yup worked - thanks!
<8> bye all..
<6> cause spam never has proper headers
<6> so you just cause a bounce flood on some unsuspecting guy who has nothing to do with the spam
<6> in short: you become a spammer, a dumb one at that yourself
<5> wols: So far, when I was required at some website to leave my email address I used: www.thatwebsite.com@mydomain.com
<5> now I get some spam on a few of those accounts... so its quite obvious that they leaked out my email address and then why can't I bounce it to them then?
<6> that is not what you said
<6> a bounce goes by the headers of the spam you receive
<6> those are forged, hitting the wrong guy ALWAYS
<6> if you make sure it goes to thatwebsite.com, then it's fine
<6> but that'd be custom code. don't think postfix can do it by default
<9> Hi! I'm setting here looking over my email server this morning (RHEL4, postfix, amavisd-new, clamAV, spam******in, razor2, and rules-du-jour) We are still getting a lot of "VlInAnGmRtAc", "oem soft", and " pharmaceutical". Our system is not overloaded but with all the scanning going on it does slow down the email. I'm looking at putting a gateway in to help (do any of you guys have any other ideals??)
<2> Bye bye fellas and thx for all the help :)
<10> i have just gone thru the set up to set my email server up, on testing i cannot connect on port 25 telnet, screen just flashes on then disappears, where are the logs for errors?
<6> syslog and mail.log
<6> on debian that is
<6> I'd also check with "netstat -anp |grep LISTEN|grep ":25"
<10> doing that command
<10> i got
<10> tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:25 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 27229/master
<10> Feb 22 12:47:02 clggroup courierpop3login: Connection, ip=[::ffff:192.168.0.1]
<10> Feb 22 13:09:01 clggroup /USR/SBIN/CRON[29340]: (root) CMD ( [ -d /var/lib/php4
<10> ] && find /var/lib/php4/ -type f -cmin +$(/usr/lib/php4/maxlifetime) -print0 |
<10> xargs -r -0 rm)
<10> sorry for pasting ti :(
<10> it says the above in both logs
<10> and thats it
<6> that log entry has nothing to do with postfix
<6> and the netstat paste shows that postfix is listening
<6> if you have problems with courierpop3: #courier
<6> tho, pop3 is port 110 and some 99x only, nothing else
<11> k1ckn1ck: grep -i mail syslog.conf to see where mail logs are
<6> open a DOS box, type "telnet <mailserver ip> 25
<6> unless you're on linux
<11> what is dos?
<6> lunaphyte_: a program loader that called itself an operating system
<9> Hi! I'm setting here looking over my email server this morning (RHEL4, postfix, amavisd-new, clamAV, spam******in, razor2, and rules-du-jour) We are still getting a lot of "VlInAnGmRtAc", "oem soft", and " pharmaceutical". Our system is not overloaded but with all the scanning going on it does slow down the email. I'm looking at putting a gateway in to help (do any of you guys have any other ideals??)
<12> sqlgrey is nice.
<13> hey, is there anyway to use system groups as local mail aliases? - if for instance I have a group finance and I want to email all users without separately editing the system group and alias?
<11> you might be able to do that if you use something like ldap



<13> hmm, I use ldap for user authentication but not with postfix yet, I'll look into postfix+ldap, thanks :)
<1> bonnyman I recommend a few DNSBLs
<1> hackeron man 5 aliases?
<14> how to add header in the mails at postfix level ..?
<6> f3ew: doesn't razor do this already?
<1> wols_ razor is post DATA
<1> Blitzkrieg1 content_filter, or with the newest snapshots PREPEND
<6> somebody named a mail filter "blitzkrieg"? wtf?
<14> wols_ : i think u need it rather than me ..
<6> Blitzkrieg1: I needed gl***es if I didn't already have some :)
<6> from the way f3ew answered, it looked like the filter would be named" "Blitzkrieg1", sorry :)
<14> ok as u wish ...u create whatever filter d u want .. i will by p*** u r filter :-)
<10> ok i have a postfix/mysql problem
<10> seems i cant log into the database
<10> when i try a test email clggroup postfix/smtpd[1668]: warning: problem talking to service rewrite: Success
<10> when i try to send an email thru telnet once entering the email it is coming from the 250 ok does nto come up and cannot continue
<15> hi, I have some issue (maybe) with Postfix-2.2.8. It wroks fine with handling LAN2LAN, LAN2WAN and from WAN2LAN email, but I also collect logs by email from my Zyxel-P334WT SOHO router which refuses to work. Everything worked fine until, I upgraded my Mandriva Linux and Postix. Any suggestions or hints?
<15> sorry for the bad spelling :)
<16> hello, i'd like to know what's the best way to install postfix,.. with MySQL, LDAP or system users??: i need it in a way that can be easy for the end user to administrate via web
<16> Any recomendations??
<16> Any Suggest??
<8> how is it possible to send an email to <foo@192.168.0.1> where 192.168.0.1 is the IP of the mailserver where the mailbox of user foo resides?
<17> foo@[192.168.0.1]
<18> hello
<18> check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:11201
<18> is there documentation available for Postfix SMTP Access Policy Delegation explaining how does it actualy work?
<17> Yes, in the same place as the rest of the Postfix documentation. See SMTPD_POLICY_README.
<18> hmm yes
<16> i'd like to know what's the best way to install postfix,.. with MySQL, LDAP or system users??: i need it in a way that can be easy for the end user to administrate via web
<18> but i dont see any details about e.g. how many connections to policy daemon listening on specified socket postfix will make?
<16> anjy suggest????
<15> I wish that that Zyxel router had some doc about their SMTP auth, type or something?
<18> zyxel?
<18> anyone have idea?
<18> do i need to write multithreading policy daemon or ... ?
<15> bonnyman: yes, Zyxel as with ref. to my first post
<15> bonnyman: sorry, that was to boraa :)
<15> I'm in telnet to that Zyxel to see if they have anything about how they do SMTP auth. so it can talk to my Postfix, 1001 conf. options but nothing about SMTP :( Postfix log won't acknowledge any connections from Zyxel and Zyxel won't tell me wtf is wrong?
<19> what could be that i cant use maildir with postfix. i set home_mailbox to .maildir/ but it keeps sending into mailbox files
<20> is it possible to have postfix do database based virtual forwardings for catchall addresses to a specific remote address ?
<20> ive used the workaround.org tutorial, and just realised that im getting relay access denied when sending to the catchall (which forwards to a hotmail acct)
<21> deadbeats_destination_concurrency_limit work out in postfix 2.0.16?
<21> deadbeats_destination_concurrency_limit it works in postfix 2.0.16?
<22> I'm getting relay access denied errors when trying to send outside mail, I have a single domain I want to use. Can someone point me in the right direction please?
<22> acutally i fixed that now but adding 10.0.0.0/8 to the relay
<22> but now i hangs and says copying to send box, it sends the message, then hangs at that.
<22> i fixed that too now
<22> i should come here every time i have a proplem!
<23> if I want to define a single host for the $mynetworks variable, do I have to do it in CIDR notation like xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/32
<6> yes
<23> thanks
<11> no
<23> yes, no? can I just us the 4 octets?
<11> correct
<23> it's on a production server so I have to be careful.
<6> lazzarello: would it matter if you put the /32 notation in there?
<11> if it'll make you feel better you can read the man pages.
<11> either way is fine.
<6> damn nick complete
<23> the man pages talk about CIDR
<23> but whatever...thanks
<24> what log can you check to see if postfix is getting query by a client trying to send mail
<24> for some reason i think my postfix install is blokcing incomming connections
<24> i can send mail locally with mutt
<23> /var/log/mail.log ?
<24> i got like 4
<24> heh
<23> tail -f /var/log/mail.log and try your connection
<24> k got it
<24> is there anything by default that would be blocking incomming
<15> I am doing some trouble shooting with Postfix-2.2.8. While telneting to it from local LAN IP it logs as connection from my LAN gateway IP. I am siiting behind NAT with DynDNS on the SOHO router. I suspect that my local zero conf DNS is messed-up or something?
<24> anyone know
<24> ?
<23> bermatize, that is a very open ended question. I do not know the details of your network.


Name:

Comments:

Please enter the result of the sum 63 + 46 (to avoid spam):






Return to #postfix
or
Go to some related logs:

intex:php
subversion darks
grub alternative x11.conf
failed to bind to LDAP server ldap 636
#perl
only udma2
uncompile pyc files
frogbot poker
dpkg interrupter xserver-xorg
iptables -A INPUT -o eth0 -tcp --dport 25 -j ALLOW



Home  |  disclaimer  |  contact  |  submit quotes