| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5
Comments:
Bracnet: Please remove this ip 202.168.227.146 from blocked list
kumee: Please remove this ip 211.20.158.76 from blocked list
Solid Solutions: Please remove 200.150.68.42 from blacklist. We have corrected identification problem.
Bo Trusbak: Please remove IP 87.53.105.142 from any of your spamlist.
We ha fix our problem
bastek: Please remove this ip 83.17.113.228 from blocked list
Gordon Othmer: Please remove 63.74.11.4 from blacklist. We have corrected identification problem on new mail server.
Fabio: Please remove this ip 201.57.180.1 from blocked list
Alexei: Where can I get the wikimedia blacklisted IP addresses?
Jasintha: Please remove my IP 203.115.21.220 from your database
Philip: Please remove this ip 204.101.186.43 from blocked list
<0> cpm ?
<1> hmm?
<0> did you saw that thing i pasted the error message int he ndr
<0> in the ndr
<0> ip.blacklist.zap , is that an actual blacklist?
<1> orogor, who is telling you this? what server is blocking you?
<2> orogor: Not quite. Unless I missed the TLD .zap
<1> pretty cool tld, but not ***igned (yet)
<0> mail.sprint.com
<1> sounds like time to call the sprint.com helpdesk
<0> same for me
<0> i have the same issue with nortel, but their ndr doesn t want to say the error
<1> 1-800-468-5555
<0> actually as soon as yesterday we were blacklisted
<0> could that be that they didnt updated their config or something ?
<1> just for fun, send me an email, cpm@daviswv.net
<0> i can t really call them, they are our prospect
<0> we do mail traffic analysis
<0> so if i call them and tell them their mail server are ****ed up they might think that s a false argument for selling
<1> believe me, the ops folks don't care about the sales side.
<1> if you wanna find out, call.
<0> humm... i need phone the salesman frst i think
<1> k
<3> rob0: I hope you don't .getawaywithit :)
<2> Bribe Verisign and you are done. :)
<3> hey hey, it's ChrisH, the primary source of deforestation in our world.
<2> Hot greetings. :)
<3> 'cause of all those girls that want to write you love letters. :)
<2> Pssst, don't you let my wife hear that. Sheeesh.
<3> "Dead ChrisH, since I read your tutorial, my postfix has never worked better. I want to have your babies. XOXO, Katie"
<2> Dead?
<3> err
<3> Dear
<3> same thing, really, when your wife finds out
<2> Considering how hard it is to suffer from a pregnancy or two I will surely not give away my kids.
<3> lol
<2> Let's hope the WLAN connection in the hospital is well so I don't get disconnected from #postfix during the birth.
<4> which is a better webmail package, squirrel or openwebmail, I have heard too much from both sides ?
<1> try'em out and see.
<1> fortunately, the buyin cost is quite reasonable, and you can get double your money back if not satisfied!
<4> true, I was looking for a opinion from this group.
<2> No idea about openwebmail. But Squirrel is okay to many people, well extensible, fast and ugly.
<1> I use squirrelmail because I'm a nut. And it says that it's for me. That, and I got tired of dealing with horde/imp.
<2> Whereas Horde/IMP is beatiful and completely unusable. :)
<1> heh
<1> I really liked it, but it became my life for a while.
<1> whereas the squirrel just worked
<2> Even the configuration thingy is weird in Imp. I never felt an itch to dig deeper into it. (shiver)
<1> It's all very wierd. Don't mess with it, if you start thinking in a horde-ish manner, yer done.
<1> I spent 4 years in a sendmail/horde haze, , , It was a waste of 4 years.
<1> ugg, draft-lyon-senderid-core is moving forward
<5> ChrisH, wouldn't *!@network.* have been more appropritiate?
<5> (:
<2> jMCg: Next time. :)
<5> Hmm.. I should.. do.. stuff.
<1> close to renaming themodules
<0> is that a linux comp ?
<1> yup, is there some other kind?
<0> cold have been any *nix flaviv
<1> yeah, I keep forgetting not everyone lives in this hell
<0> so what des it says when u try t boot it ?
<1> oh it boots fine, the aic7xxx module doesn't work and play well with my tape library
<6> i'm using sender address verification and if someone sends me a message to a non-existant user on my server, it does a sender verify instead of saying unknown user in recipient table, do you know what directive i need to add to smtpd_sender_restrictions?
<0> HAahhaaaaaaa noo
<0> i crapped out opera on my mobile
<7> I'm using postfix+postgrey (check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:60000). Is it possible to accept mail if postgrey crashes?
<8> tape library? what on earth?
<9> which is processed first - /etc/aliases or /etc/postfix/virtual?
<9> (and do they chain?)
<0> haa hparker, this guy is everywhere
<10> Dewi, alias_maps applies to local(8) addresses only ($mydestination), virtual_alias_maps (virtual(5)) applies to all.
<10> Are BDB 4.2 hash maps compatible with BDB 4.4?
<11> hi
<11> i got problem with my email server..
<11> Temporary lookup failure; from=<amir@nex6.com.my> to=<amirharis@gmail.com> proto=ESMTP helo=<mail.nex6.com.my>
<12> Problem: Sending multiple messages to postfix results in the last one getting stuck in the queue and not sent until more messages are sent. Then one of those get's stuck. If I delay sending messages by 1-2 seconds, problem doesn't occur. Any thoughts?
<13> Which queue does it get stuck in?
<12> maildrop
<12> and its Arrival Time is ??
<12> I tried setting the queue_run_delay to 70 seconds just to see if qmgr would pick it up as the default is 1000 seconds
<12> but it just ignores it I guess.
<12> the message int he queue that is. Not the config setting :)
<12> also, if I stop postfix and start it up again, it grabs it and delivers.
<12> like nothing happened.
<14> where can i get the latest rbl list?
<10> http://rbls.org/ has links.
<12> sending 4 messages in rapid succession, 2 send and 2 sit in the queue...sigh
<12> Alright. I added a -v on qmgr, smtp, pickup, and cleanup. Fiddled a bit and no problems were being logged. In fact everything completely ignore the messages that are gettin stuck.
<12> but now when I try to turn off -v in master.cf ... they aren't there anymore and I still get verbose output... wha?
<12> aack! How the heck to I turn off the verbosity!
<10> stop and restart?
<12> :) Yeah, I tried that a couple times...
<10> Daemonic possession! You need an exorcist!
<10> The POWER of Wietse Compels you!
<12> What I don't understand is the -v's I added in master.cf were gone when I went back in to remove them.
<12> frakin gnomes.
<14> rob0, how many should one use, would two rbl servers suffice?
<13> magyar: That's probably the wrong question. If there are two whose policies match your needs and that you find reliable, great. If there's still too much getting through, you either need more or different. If there's false positives, you need to get rid of one or both and maybe add others to make up for it?
<13> er no "?"
<10> ^^ good answer
<10> saved me from typing it :)
<14> mendel, "policies"?, not too clear on that?
<10> Different RBL's have different goals.
<13> RBLs block your mail based on someone else's decisions
<10> Different listing and delisting policies.
<13> So you need to find out how they make those decisions and see if they're decisions you'd make too.
<10> That's fine IFF you agree with that person's rationale, and IFF they are careful.
<13> their rationale, and what they actually do. It's one thing to say "we only list known spammers" if "known" means "someone reported them without evidence"
<14> wow, there are a few dozen of them, which one would be the most common?
<10> In actual practice you can't go wrong with sbl-xbl.
<13> I find the sbl-xbl to be the best to list first.
<13> We also block dynamic ip addresses, using dynablock.njabl.org
<10> list.dsbl.org and combined.njabl.org are good.
<13> But still! read their policies.
<10> I do well with Spamcop despite its many false positives ... rbl_reply_maps and I use a 454 for Spamcop.
<14> mendel, dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net i am ***uming that is same thing. Which makes sense, mail server on dynamic setting :)
<13> No, it's a different thing.
<14> bahh
<13> It's the same idea, but it's run by different people. I don't trust sorbs.
<10> dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net is the best SORBS list.
<13> And since I'm asking them to make decisions about my mail, trust is important.
<13> This is true.
<14> RBL should have a "For dummies" -_-
<13> rbl for dummies is "use sbl-xbl after you find out their listing policy"
<13> and "after you find out their listing policy" is there because using them without knowing why you are rejecting mail is pretty silly
<10> ???
<14> eheheh
<14> its a joke
<14> mendel, says sorbs are not too good, rob0 says its the best -_-
<10> They're very effective, much more than the common content filtering, and NO, I did NOT say that.
<10> I said 04:32 < rob0> dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net is the best SORBS list.
<10> meaning "the best of what SORBS offers."
<14> i got it, as long as i have four or five that fit my "views" that should do the trick.
<14> thanks for your input gents
<10> The number is not as important as the wuality.
<10> quality
<14> i totaly agree with you on that one. I'll need to play arround with the lists for a few weeks and make notes.
<14> my users will have bliss at last :)
<14> I get calls every day with viagra issues
<10> Another very effective thing, but a little inconvenient at times, is greylisting.
<10> And definitely, do helo checks for your own IP and domain names.
<14> rob0, tried that, but for some odd reason mailservers refuse to resend on a failure
<14> rob0, the helo rejects are a blessing i get about 25 every minute
<15> on top of blocking my name and ip i do reject_invalid_hostname, reject_non_fqdn_hostname
<15> i have a pretty constant streem of helo rejections
<15> i dont find greylisting that effective for spam anymore, still works against viruses but doesn't seem worth it just for that
<14> lockdown, thats a given for "smtpd_recipient_restrictions"
<14> lockdown, amavis and clam is "DA Bomb" for viruses
Return to
#postfix
or
Go to some related
logs:
#web
loadxml +lt +gt
wizz_kidd irc
/nzbperl.pl line 33.
debian raid status adaptec 7xxx
colinux xserver-xorg
ubntu mplayer
#perl
et131x fedora
#perl
|
|