| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4
Comments:
<0> the Force is electromagnetic with you, Luke.
<1> depends what you want to simulate (again I'm being redundant)
<0> I want to make a model of our solar system
<0> and then delete jupiter
<1> you can't possibly model everything - if you could, then the Standard Model is a start
<0> and see what happens
<0> lol
<0> its not impossible.. im sure it cant be that hard other then reaction time
<1> for a simplistic and nearly useless simulation, use kepler's laws
<0> i'll probably give it a try after I successfully finish my first project
<0> (a perfect reproduction of the brain :P)
<1> ha
<0> So far i'm like 1% done
<0> I got the pictures
<0> :D
<0> nah just kiddin
<0> well thanks arbscht
<0> I looked up standard model on wiki
<0> and now im caught in the wikipedia loop :-/
<0> probably for a few hours
<0> so i'll be back soon
<1> :)
<2> hello everyone
<2> there is one thing that makes me wondering
<2> something related to seti and ftl travel
<2> if we discover a radio civilization at a large distance wouldn't this mean that this civilization hasn't been able to discover a way for ftl? because if so then we would have met this civilization before meeting it's radio signature
<2> just wondering..
<2> would therefore a such discovery be a good argument against the possibility of FTL?
<2> (i mean about a large distance something like thousants of light years, which should give it enough time to develop FTL knowledge starting from radio knowledge level)
<2> [of course unless they selfdestroyed themselfs meanwhile :)]
<1> or decided we weren't worth meeting
<2> heh :)
<1> no, I don't think it's a compelling argument for anything, but it would probably make for a good conversation starter with arthur c clarke :)
<3> hello
<4> uV: yo yo !
<4> uV: long time no see
<3> hi JohnFlux
<3> since friday night? :)
<4> uV: ah did I see you then?
<3> if you were here I think yes! :)
<3> anybody familiar with low-pressure long arc Xenon discharges?
<4> no, but how hard can it be? :)
<3> hard?
<3> so i need detailed luminous efficiency of Xe discharges with specified current densities
<5> hello
<5> JohnFlux: i study at an away university and have to work while i study
<5> so i want to make things as easy as possible for me
<6> Manyfold: yes, tell more about that
<5> about what?
<6> about your away university studies
<5> there is not more to tell
<7> no more to the story?
<5> no
<6> Manyfold: ok, you dont need to tell more if you dont want to
<7> special names for the Earth include Mother Earth and Gaia, are there any such common names for the local solar system and universe?
<7> and why isn't the 'solar' in solar system supposed to be capitalized? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_system
<6> Kanzure: that's because it is an instance of a solar system called "Solar system"
<6> names start with capital letter of course
<7> pgm, Wikipedians are demanding that your use of 'solar system' there should be 'stellar system' instead, but whatever : /
<8> right
<8> like our sun is called Sun
<7> Wikipedia is saying the sun is the only one named (and called) sun
<7> do we have a residential nut available today? I'm looking for alternatives to atomism (just for the heck of it)
<3> re
<9> lo
<3> bye
<3> re
<10> hello
<7> hello there
<10> 27 secs on minesweeper intermediate
<10> 25 secs intermediate
Return to
#physics
or
Go to some related
logs:
eggdrop xchat ubuntu
qemu convert from iso to qcow
GTK_CONFIG experiment
#php
#css
#php
imagestring convert UTF-8
#bash
colt zaptel
#perl
|
|