| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Comments:
<0> doesnt work
<0> not "not working"
<1> !tell Azuos001 about doesnt work
<1> :x
<1> it doesn't work ;/
<0> try "doesn't work" :)
<1> :D
<1> !tell Azuos001 about doesn't work
<0> lol
<2> Drakas: No, sorry - not at the moment. I have a screenshot though with a very simple template running in the back - the WYSIWYG editor in the front. This can be replaced with TinyMCE or similar which is MUCH more powerful. Unfortunately the screenshots dosn't say much about the great design underneath
<1> that's it!!:D
<0> Jemt: any sources we could see?
<1> Jemt: hey, I used tinymce in my one too !:)
<2> http://powerzone.dk/Screenshot.png
<3> !+doesn't work
<4> Look buddy, doesn't work is a strong statement. Does it sit on the couch all day? Does it want more money? Is it on IRC all the time? Please be specific! Examples of what doesn't work tend to help too. Finally, showing us the code is helpful (after you've explained your problem). /msg php-bot pastebin for more information
<2> itrebal: Not at the moment. But I will probably release it in 3-4 weeks or so
<1> Jemt: just looking at url doesn't make me feel flexible :/
<0> ok
<2> Drakas: ?
<2> Drakas: Oh!
<5> bluefish sux
<2> Drakas: It is VERY flexible - believe me :)
<1> eddiestone: so do you
<5> thanks
<1> blue fish is the best for linux;]
<2> Bluefish is not the best tool around - I can agree with that
<1> weaverslave & dreamweaver for windows
<5> its your opinion
<2> Well, the highlighting ****s
<1> Jemt: what do you use?
<2> I haft to press F5 every 5 seconds to refresh the syntax colors :)
<1> well, bluefish's highlighting seriously ****s and is ugly
<1> and you have to press F5
<1> ;]
<3> oh, no... Another editor war :/
<2> itrebal: Nice choice :)
<2> Drakas: Yep :)
<1> !+offtopic
<5> eclipse ownz
<1> Jemt: what do you use?
<2> eddiestone: It does not. It is way to heavy
<2> Drakas: I use Bluefish :)
<6> !+offtopic
<1> hehe
<1> !+off topic
<1> ;)
<6> Hmm. That doesn't do anything...
<2> I was considering Vim though
<6> Vim. Always a nice choice.
<2> Agree :)
<1> i have no idea how to use vim with those keyboard navigation things. all i know is :q :wq :q! Insert and Esc ;]
<6> Drakas: There's more?
<1> Nomikos: seriously?
<6> Well, and :compile.
<1> freeone3000: i know :)
<1> :compile ?!:D
<1> wow!
<2> Oh, console tools is the bomb. No mouse - soo nice :)
<7> Drakas, uhmm.. no :)
<1> i prefer using mouse when working on larger scripts :) mouse selects instantly instead of uholding the keyboard
<7> at least, not with syntax coloring
<0> i need to finish learning mouseles Emacs and then my only gui-fied program will be Firefox :)
<6> w3m > firefox.
<1> Opera > all web browsers that ****
<1> :D
<2> freeone3000: That's a nice tool too - but not > then FF ;)
<2> Drakas: Hehe ;)
<1> opera is the owning one
<2> Firefox is :p
<1> opera is better but not owning
<8> !+g10
<1> but opera is much more secure
<5> lynx is better
<5> :)
<2> Links2 then :)
<1> eddiestone: yeah, lynx and links are good
<8> !+g
<0> the issue with text-based browsers is they dont do javascript (most)
<2> itrebal: True, unfortunately
<1> itrebal: not an issue to me, because i make sites work without js
<8> !+g11
<6> Part of the standard that sites should work without js.
<1> the bot is dead :D
<0> Drakas: of course - all my sites dont require javascript (except for one which is an image viewing script)
<9> it doesn't work: alert("<? echo $msg_login_js ?>"); this variable is from php. My box alert comes up with only the word "echo" in it
<2> What is it with your guys and JS? What's wrong with JS? It's great :)
Return to
#php
or
Go to some related
logs:
#perl
#sdl
#linux
#perl
#math
dilbert beverly job title -hills -hillbillies
error while loading shared libraries: libselinux.so.1: failed to map segment fro
#web
biopod Ubuntu
Debian kernel-headers-2.6.12-1-686
|
|
