@# Quotes DB     useful, funny, interesting





Google
 
Web www.quotesdb.info
Undernet  |  EFnet  |  Quakenet  |  Freenode  |  Dalnet  |  Ircnet  |  Galaxynet
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31



Comments:

<0> Not really, no.
<1> FlamingCows: no problem, I have time, been scratching my head over the few past days with this :/
<2> thanks
<3> please chek this and tell me what`s the problem http://pastebin.com/597500
<4> DjDarkman: how do we know the issueif we dont know the symptom?
<3> itrebal: it`s on my server ,i get 0 for the error code when i try to upload but i never stops uplading
<4> how large is the file?
<3> 851 bytes
<5> DjDarkman: refresh your pastebin
<3> kodekrash: done
<3> 10x
<3> Parse error: parse error, unexpected T_STRING, expecting '(' in /var/www/s/upld.php on line 5
<0> tenmon: Got it.
<0> http://pastebin.com/597508
<0> It was a matter of backslashes.
<0> Stupid multi-level escaping...



<4> ah damnit, i hate a hang-nail on my toe
<1> FlamingCows: if it works you'll be the god of flaming cows :D
<6> night
<1> FlamingCows: oh man, it works, you're a god!
<0> :)
<1> FlamingCows: in the past week I've started to learn regex for a lexer translator I'm doing, and didn't had any major problem or stopper
<1> FlamingCows: but this single thing put me off to a stop, where I couldn't do anything more
<1> FlamingCows: I was starting to think that it couldn't be done with a regular expression
<1> :D
<0> heh, it's a simple enough regex, just with all the levels of backslash escaping going on, backslashes are a real pain in the arse to deal with.
<0> Especially right next to a '\n'.
<1> yeah, actually the most difficult things to me now are backslashes and newlines
<1> because in php they work different from another tool I'm using
<7> if I have url foo.php?bar, isset($_GET['bar']) should be true right?
<7> can't figure out why it's turning out false
<8> try $HTTP_GET_VARS
<1> shouldn't be foo.php?bar= ?
<8> ['bar']
<8> right, and also it should be that
<7> is $HTTP_GET_VARS the old fashioned way? I know my version supports $_GET
<9> void[]: It should give you TRUE.
<7> but I'm almost certain I've done it before without =
<8> i believe _GET is the old way
<8> but i don't think it's turned off
<0> No.
<0> _GET is the good, new, way.
<0> HTTP_GET_VARS is the old, deprecated, way.
<7> pwned :p
<8> ah, well there you go
<1> and what is old is the register globals also
<8> right
<8> those are bad
<0> ?bar mean $_GET['bar'] has no value, meaning it will evaluate to false when typecasting.
<3> wich functiomn can get me the current directory (in wich i have the php)?
<0> isset($_GET['bar']) should be fine, though.
<1> the '=' makes the variable being set in 'foo.php?bar=' ?
<0> !tell DjDarkman about func getcwd
<9> tenmon: = is not necessary
<7> it is requiring bar= for some reason!
<7> when I put it on there it works
<3> 10x FlamingCows
<1> so, to '=' or not to '=', that's the question :P
<8> if = works, use =
<8> easy question
<1> not really
<1> maybe the behaviour changed between versions
<1> something not really uncommon ;)
<7> I'm almost certain I've done it without = on this same version
<1> maybe it's a setting on php configuration ?
<7> haven't touched that either
<1> then, it's weird
<10> I vaguely recall that behavior being supported, but I don't remember the details. I'll see if TFM has anything...
<0> Have you done a var_dump($_GET) to be sure exactly what's there?
<9> FlamingCows: Has no value as $some_var = NULL; ?
<0> I guess.
<7> I looked at $_SERVER['QUERY_STRING'] and it's there, I'll try that too
<0> Of course it would be in the query string.
<9> FlamingCows: If so, isset($_GET['bar']) should return TRUE, right?
<0> Yes.



<7> not showing in var_dump($_GET)
<0> Weird.
<7> "var_dump($_SERVER['QUERY_STRING']); var_dump($_GET); exit;" -> "string(13) "id=rxs3e0&bar" array(1) { ["id"]=> string(6) "rxs3e0" }"
<0> Try bar&id=rxs3e0
<7> "string(13) "bar&id=rxs3e0" array(1) { ["id"]=> string(6) "rxs3e0" }"
<0> Weird.
<7> yes!
<10> What are you doing that doesn't p*** a value, out of curiosity?
<7> just shows a slightly different view of the page
<7> ?bar is neater than ?bar= but I'll add the = if I have to :p
<0> You could parse the query string yourself.
<7> true.. or actually couldn't I just do some string and set $_GET ?
<7> string split
<1> void[]: if you ask me, doing apache mod redirects would be even neater that the '?' thing
<7> I don't think this signifies a new virtual page, or whatever you want to call that
<1> void[]: maybe you're right, I don't know the particular case
<11> sup all
<7> it's the same page just excluding a certain thing, user's preference
<11> not much I guess...
<1> void[]: then it's not worth, and foo?bar= would be fine I guess
<1> maybe you could use foo?userpref=bar instead I guess
<7> hm maybe!
<7> Thanks for the ***istance, all
<1> that's the most common way anyways, and if you want it prettier, using mod redirects (like when making the page SEF) is good also
<7> SEF?
<12> heh
<1> search engine friendly
<1> :P
<12> anyone tell me if www.platinum-designz.net resolves?
<13> hello
<7> Did you mean mod rewrite though?
<7> I am using that, really cool feature
<1> void[]: http://nexodyne.com/showthread.php?t=8147
<14> Hmm, would you guys say ... if myspace.com was done in PHP, and done properly... it would have a myspace cl*** ... ?
<10> foo: Why?
<1> void[]: well, a very common use of mod rewrite is to make SEF pages
<14> CWhiz: Curious.
<13> when i do $_SESSION["test"]="this is a test". in one php page and then i do echo $_SESSION["test"] in another page. why do i get Undefined variable: _SESSION
<7> tenmon: yeah, I am very concerned with "pretty urls" (SEF ones). you just said mod redirect when I ***umed you meant rewrite.
<15> Alexi5, because you forgot to call session_start()?
<10> foo: Well, the question is kind of broad. There's a lot of ways to write something like MySpace.
<1> void[]: lol, you're right, it's late here
<10> foo: And of those many ways, there's multiple "correct" ways.
<14> CWhiz: I know .. but if it was done "properly" ... should a cl*** be used? Or just several functions? What way would be more effective. hmm
<14> CWhiz: I see. What way would you say would be more effective ?
<14> hmm
<9> foo: Whose definition of properly?
<11> foo: typically there are several cl***es which contains several methods, as well as includes which contain simple functions....
<10> foo: I usually prefer object-oriented programming. But even with OOP, there's different cl*** structures that could be used. Some might have a root MySpace cl***, but others might not.
<11> it depends on how the programmer writes his/her code... some people may make a cl*** which contains methods that involve database interactions etc... or a cl*** used simply to inspect input data and so on..
<14> CWhiz, cyphor, tws: I see. Thanks - if you had to do something like myspace, how would you structure it? As far as making several functions ... or having a cl*** with several methods .. hmm.
<11> I'd probably have some of everything
<10> foo: You still seem to be holding something back. We're not going to re-implement MySpace for you.
<11> maybe have a cl*** that contains the base site header and footer, a cl*** that contains methods for inspecting user-supplied input data, a cl*** that contains database queries and so on... then I'd probably have a simple functions include that contains stuff like maybe a function that converts timestamps based on user selected timezone etc..
<3> how can i get teh contents of a directory?
<9> foo: It will need some thinking and some changes after the result of thinking is implemented.
<11> heh
<10> DjDarkman: http://php.net/opendir
<11> DjDarkman: see also http://us3.php.net/manual/en/ref.dir.php
<3> 10x CWhiz & cyphor
<11> np
<16> hi
<11> hello zulqar
<16> i need help
<11> oh?
<14> cyphor: thank you.
<16> first i make run.sh shall script i give chmod +x run.sh
<11> np foo
<14> CWhiz: I'm not holding nothing back, and I'm not asking you to re-implement myspace. I am curious, and nothing more.
<16> but when ever i click it won't open inside my own software
<16> but when i try with ./run.sh it works?
<11> wrong place to be asking those types of questions zulqar
<16> any idea
<9> zulqar: Your own software?


Name:

Comments:

Please enter the result of the sum 63 + 46 (to avoid spam):






Return to #php
or
Go to some related logs:

ubuntu no sda1
CVS advantages over SVN
undefined reference to XdmcpWrap
#perl
Ubuntu mouse not workin
get raw headers php
ubuntu mbrola how-to
sles10 dhcpd
debian sarge 3w-9xxx install
famouse mathematica



Home  |  disclaimer  |  contact  |  submit quotes