| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Comments:
<0> they sorta work off and on like every other minute idk what
<0> basically, the new version (on localhost) using the same fonts . . the text is real small and everything
<1> cdizzle: ... what does this have to do with php?
<0> with gd i ***ume ?
<0> its the same fonts, same functions, same usage
<1> cdizzle: ah, you're generating images? I see
<2> how can a web request be made to "crawl" a website?
<1> sym0_: it can't
<0> yes, srry i didnt make that clear :(
<3> hi all
<2> im just trying to understand the coding aspect, to where a url can be entered in and every file be browsed
<2> there is programs that you can enter a url and it maps the entire site
<2> how does it discover directories, files, etc?
<1> sym0_; you make one request, the program grabs all the URLs from the data, and makes a request to each of them
<1> sym0_: it doesn't find any hidden files
<2> like a GET request to the root?
<1> sym0_: no?
<2> what type of request would be sent to the web server?
<1> a HTTP request. The same type of request you send with your browser
<2> I understand that, aidan, but WHICH request
<1> sym0_: see the HTTP 1.1 specification
<4> i have cl***, can i access functions of that cl*** with: $stringwCl***Name::foo();
<1> slicslak: yes
<2> im trying to make a program, in php, that crawls a website and strips all the email addresses from the files
<2> I can handle the regex and preg_match_all...
<1> sym0_: okay, that's nice... and we'd want to help you do that ... why?
<5> sym0_: E-Mail harvester? So you can spam?
<2> Well, not per say spam
<1> I knew all spammers were ****wits, but you take the cake.
<2> its for a friend trying to get involved in modeling
<2> im trying to find a way to get agents interested
<4> that's what i thought aidan , but when i try, php says: Parse error: parse error, unexpected T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM
<2> so im harvesting email addresses from modeling sites
<1> yeh, spamming them will really help, sym0_
<4> T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM is a double colon apparently
<2> thats how they expect to be contacted anyway
<1> slicslak: try the line above it
<2> its just i dont have time to go through every single site and find all the emails
<1> sym0_: I don't give a ****, shut up already
<2> ::shrug:: was being honest
<3> I try to use url with parameters, ie. <a hre="page.php?str=hello"></a> howerver, after clicking on my link, in my page.php, I have an error message : Undefined variable: str. I don't understand why I have this message.
<2> spamming works though, im certain.
<2> people dont spam to be annoying - they do it because it works.
<1> sym0_: shut up, moron
<2> whats moronic about it? It works?
<5> sym0_: Chill.
<6> sym0_: You're heading toward a kickban if you don't stop.
<0> do error_reporting( E_ALL & ~E_NOTICE ); and it will get rid of the underfixed variable errors
<2> Okay, I understand, but for what?
<6> For being stupid.
<1> sym0_: It's illegal. We're not going to help you, a) because it's illegal, and b) because we don't want your stupid spam. You, asking in here, is moronic.
<5> sym0_: Not all things that work are good and decent to do.
<2> Okay, I understand that.
<2> Is spamming actually illegal though?
<6> Yes.
<1> iOops; you can't use $_GET['str'] without checking that it exists. if (isset($_GET['str'])) { ...
<5> sym0_: Yes.
<2> Is there some law that regulates how or defines specifically how places can be contacted via email ?
<3> aidan, ok
<3> thank you
<6> sym0_: Unsolicited e-mail, tes.
<6> *yes
<5> sym0_: You should find the meaning of Spam.
<6> !tell sym0_ about g16
<6> Quit while you're ahead.
<0> ok looksl ike i fixed my virtualhost conf
<0> http://sig.phpwnedv2.cdizzle.px4ce.net:55555/cdizzle is my new version of my sig (IMAGE) script
<0> using the same fonts and functions as . .. http://sig.phpwned.com/cdizzle
<1> still can't see it
<6> 'Firefox can't find the server at sig.phpwnedv2.cdizzle.px4ce.net.'
<6> Meh.
<0> damnit haha
<0> i will do a screenie
<5> cdizzle: Cannot access the page.
<7> i can see the page fine
<7> font insanely hard to read
<0> http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/3332/cdizzle9ip.gif - - - OLD VERSION
<0> http://img49.imageshack.us/img49/1743/cdizzlenew2hk.gif - - - NEW VERSION
<0> obviously different colors
<0> thats just my color settings i can change that easy
<0> but its the fonts / size that im talkin about
<6> The second one is barely readable.
<0> when i ran this under windoze before i switched to linux, it looked almost identicle to the old version
<0> i was using wamp
<0> but im not sure exactly the configure command to use
<1> cdizzle: the fonts on windows and linux are probably different ... that shouldn't be a shock
<6> Anyway, I hate those 'recently played' list sigs. Like I have nothing better to do than find out what crappy music you listen to (not 'you' personally, 'you' in general, heh).
<1> cdizzle: just change the font-size in image_text or whatever, relax
<0> it is ttf fonts
<0> in a fonts directory
<0> not a system fonts dir
<0> ./configure --without-sqlite --without-pdo-sqlite --with-gd --with-mysql --with-mysqli --with-zip --with-zlib --with-bzip2 --with-ftp --enable-sockets --with-curl --with-mbhash --enable-mcrypt --with-magic-quotes --without-register-globals --with-apxs=/usr/local/apache/bin/apxs --with-ttf --with-xml --with-xslt --with-pear --with-gettext --enable-bcmath && make && make install && /usr/local/apache/bin/apachectl restart
<1> cdizzle: I don't know, different versions of GD, etc... whatever, who cares?
<5> cdizzle: The new one is on Linux?
<4> aidan, found the problem. php4 dies for some reason on $stringwCl***Name::foo(), the work around is to wrap the whole thing in eval()
<0> is my configure command and http://www.dd.am/phpinfo.php5 is what it is on the old version
<6> slicslak: Eww.
<1> slicslak: eval is never a solution
<6> If you're going to have a dynamic signature, make it worth reading. Like this: http://codevortex.com/quotesb.jpg
<7> http://rasc.ath.cx/stats/jynxster.jpg <-- my dynamic one
<1> that's just as pointless
<0> tws: yes it is on linux, so is the old one, but when i created the new one, i was on windoze and it looked like it was supposed to
<1> I'm reading the damn forum for the content, not to look at several pages of stupid sigs
<6> aidan: No, slightly less pointless.
<6> At least it has some decent content.
<1> FlamingCows: If I wanted to read quotes, I would go to quotationspage.com
<1> anyway, I don't really care... I don't look at forums any more, and if I did I'd disable signatures
<6> I never said you should use it just to read quotes.
<5> http://codevortex.com/audio/sperm.mp3. Heh ...
<8> anyone with Mac here and the new iLife? Do you know how many templates iWeb comes with?
<5> suv4x4: #mac # ilife #iweb
<9> lol
<1> FlamingCows: this conversation has become stupid already
<8> tws, yea sorry, just in a great hurry and pasting everything in the wrong chans :()
<6> aidan: yes, mostly because you decided to express your general opinion of any signature.
<1> FlamingCows: <6> I never said you should use it just to read quotes., I never implied that you said that
<6> <1> FlamingCows: If I wanted to read quotes, I would go to quotationspage.com
<1> FlamingCows: once [you] put your stupid sig on a forum, you're making everyone else read it, whether they want to or not
<6> I'm not making anyone read it, it's as simple as skipping over it.
<1> FlamingCows: If [someone] wanted to read quotes, [they] would go to quotationspage.com
<1> FlamingCows: that's what they say about spam email
<1> FlamingCows: anyway I don't care, I'm not attacking you personally
<5> aidan: I disagree. I only read those signatures only when I wanted to and never get to read them when I'm not in the mood to.
<6> But they're voluntarily reading a forum, acknowleding that images and signatures come with it.
<1> tws: it's kind of hard to dodge when they're half a page thick and blinking
<6> It's not blinking, and it's certainly not half a page thick.
<1> FlamingCows: I never said it was.
<1> you are having difficultly abstracting yourself
<5> The only solution is to end it, NOW. :)
<6> No, but you were originally deprecating my specific signature.
<1> Even if it's small, what if you post 25 times in a thread... great, the same image 25 times. It's just pointless. That's all.
<1> FlamingCows: you yourself acknowledge it as only slightly less pointless
<6> I'm not going to argue specific wording, but when you equate it to spam, that's going way further than what I was saying.
<1> anyway, tws is right, let us all carry on in our own pointless existences and not stress ourselves
<1> your argument is one that is used to justify spam, that is all
<6> aidan: In an entirely different context, yes. But fine, let's end it.
<1> I'm very argumentative today :(
<10> what a bitch
<10> i agree :P
<1> I have a cold and I've been couped up all day, sorry :(
<10> just dont ask what the chicken really is :P
<11> Aidan, I have *fluid* in my *lungs*.
<11> Think yourself lucky.
<5> [Karlprof]: Hmm. That's bad.
<11> Never =P
<11> I make gurgling noises when I breathe out. If it wasn't so disturbing it'd be hilarious.
<10> hope you saw a doctor about it :p
<11> I'll go if it goes any worse. Promise.
<5> [Karlprof]: Can hair-dryer fix that? :-0
Return to
#php
or
Go to some related
logs:
I830DRIScreenInit failed because of a version mismatch
qtsmbstatus
innodb_buffer_pool_pages_free -
where is ide_scsi
script ajaxified links
does ubuntu need a firewall
#asm
gentoo syntax error near unexpected token dhcp
#gentoo
split a rar file
|
|
