| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
Comments:
<0> then implode it again
<1> Davey|Work: Implemented properly, that'll almost always be the case. XPath'ing over a document with libxml2 is much faster than walking over dom nodes with, e.g, foo.childNodes.
<2> why not just xpath('/img[@src]')
<2> i think
<1> /
<0> cos this way we get to use implode
<1> Er, //
<0> and thats a cool word
<3> if pg_insert is failing, how can i see why ?
<2> mattmcc: // implies it has to be a top level node no?
<1> winmutt: No, that's what / does.
<4> what's up with php 5?
<2> oh
<2> php5 is powa
<1> winmutt: E.g, /html vs //img
<0> php5 is kinda like php4, but with more stuff
<0> does that help?
<5> meh
<5> if str_replace supported wildcard chars, I'd be all set :P
<2> php5 is like php4 without broken references and what looks like is going to be a nice oop interface in php6
<2> randy: make sure your regex is not greedy, greedy is the default
<0> seriously, if you make sure all your images are like <img ANY TAGS GO HERE src="thesrc">
<0> so make sure the src is the last one
<0> then exlode ($img, 'src=')
<0> the array generated by that (call it srcarray)....so $srcarray[1] will be "thesrc">
<0> then explode that again at the >...
<6> php5 is like php4 without the ability to easily get a deep copy of an object
<2> IXB: thats horribly inefficent
<0> so $srcarray2[0]="thesrc"
<0> well yeah
<0> but
<1> TML: Clone?
<6> mattmcc: My understanding is that clones are shallow copies
<0> change the $srcarray[0] to whatever then ew src is and implode the arrays back again
<2> TML: "deep copy"? you mean like db handlers etc?
<5> IXB: it would work
<0> its messy but it would work
<7> Clone doesn't give a deep copy?
<5> yeah
<7> Odd...
<0> and its prolly easier to use and debug and just as fast as some bizarre regexp
<6> I could be mistaken, having not actually *USED* PHP5
<8> mattmcc, if you care, http://ajaxian.com/archives/faster-dom-queries
<9> I have a web service that is receiving this string "name&name", it is arriving name&name, this is result of magic quotes?
<0> you'll have to make sure you know exactly what your <img> tags look like though
<6> "When an object is cloned, PHP 5 will perform a shallow copy of all of the object's properties."
<8> TML: clones are sorta shallow copies, you use the __clone method to do a deep copy ;)
<6> Quoth php.net/oop5
<7> Silly, silly.
<7> That just ****s.
<8> inside __clone, clone the nested objects ;)
<1> There are so many things to say about that.
<7> I figured you could do some trickery in __clone()
<6> You have to individually clone each property of the cl*** in __clone(), if I'm reading this correctly
<2> TML: that is incorrect
<2> i just cloned an html tree and it worked like a champ
<2> in php5.1.2
<0> randy - you could also do it with some of the string fucntion i think..strtok....cant be sure though, i'd have to look it up.
<10> time() spits out 1143871200 how can i get the date on there too? like 20060411125601 ?
<2> now clone doesnt deal with external references/pointers like db handlers
<5> heh, they still haven't removed the greek from the US php.net mirrors
<11> http://www.myresourcespace.com/myspace.txt -> anyone have any idea why this is ending headers prematurly. I dont even play with headers.
<6> winmutt: What does "worked like a champ" mean?
<6> winmutt: You verified that it was a deep copy?
<2> FatalRemedy: its segfaulting
<6> What sort of verification did you do?
<5> anyone else getting mostly Greek language on this page? http://us3.php.net/manual/el/function.strtok.php
<8> winmutt, clone is shallow, the HTML tree's __clone method deep copied the children ;)
<2> I rendered both trees
<2> makde modifications on the second tree
<8> especially ***uming you are talking about a DOM Tree
<12> randy: yes, because you have /el/ in there.
<2> Davey: I have no such magic method defined
<8> winmutt, are the children objects, or arrays?
<12> If you want english, make that /en/ instead.
<2> its my own HTML cl***, plenty of circular references
<5> Tresnar: eep
<2> childNodes being an array of objects and or static strings
<5> Tresnar: I can't take it out!
<0> why does mySQL store dates yyyy-mm-dd
<5> ah
<13> because it can?
<2> IXB: because its simplistic
<0> why not dd-mm-yyyy like everyone else?
<5> I can switch it to en, though
<5> nice
<12> randy: Can't you just edit it in your browser's address bar, and then go to the edited link?
<8> winmutt, but the arrays of objects will not be clones, they are references ;)
<8> IXB, sorting
<14> IXB: It stored it as a date, it *displays* it as YYYY-MM-DD when asked for it as a string
<15> IXB: you can't sort dd-mm-yyy like you can yyyy-mm-dd
<1> IXB: "everyone else"? :)
<0> really?
<0> wow, never knew that
<8> GarethAdams, actually, I'm sure it stores it as the string :)
<2> Davey: blimey
<0> if not its not too hard to flip it round, really
<0> just irritating
<8> winmutt, ?
<14> Davey|Work: really? you can +0 and get it as a timestamp can't you?
<2> TML: yes i lied, you are correct
<2> Davey: it is shallow
<14> or am i making that up?
<1> IXB: It's pretty much a non-issue, given that you can just format the date however you want, right there in the query.
<8> winmutt, :P
<1> IXB: Most DBs also provide a way to set the default date format.
<0> meh just flip the string around with functions afterwards
<2> i am frequently wrong as my wife :)
<0> i dont like using mysql functions, i always manage to crash something or other
<8> GarethAdams, just because it can do math, doesn't mean it's not stored like that
<8> GarethAdams, it's certainly not stored as a UNIX timestamp for example
<1> IXB: It's much more efficient to let the DB do it than to do it in PHP.
<16> davey cant do math! davey cant do math! davey cant do math!
<14> fair enough
<17> how do i get the absolute unix path of the current php file?
<8> enygma, quote true.
<1> LazyAngel: http://php.net/realpath
<13> enygma: 1+2=42
<16> w3wt
<2> 42= number of streets......
<1> Stormchaser: No, that's 12!
<13> !+42
<18> 42 is the answer to life, the universe, and everything
<8> enygma, did you buy your ball and chain yet? Did you go for the traditional black iron one or the new fangled titanium covered lead? :)
<13> no, I'm right, mattmcc :)
<0> mattmcc - im sure it is more effecient but the scale of the projects i work on, its more important that they work all the time rather than working well but crashing occasionally cos i **** at sql functions and so on
<16> Davey - yes, we did get our marriage certificate ;)
<1> IXB: Surely, then, the solution is learning how to do it right... :)
<0> that means like..
<0> learning things
<0> i have enough to learn without that
<17> mattmcc: echo realpath("test.php"); doesn't give me anything :(
<8> IXB: like not letting kids handle your important data?
<8> LazyAngel, then the file doesn't exist in CWD :)
<2> http://www.google.com/search?q=the+answer+to+life%2C+the+universe%2C+and+everything&btnG=Search
<1> LazyAngel: Right, it's not supposed to. You p*** it something like the SCRIPT_FILENAME from $_SERVER
<2> google knows all
<0> as ive said - i didnt let her
<0> the people who work at the office arent IT people
<0> neither am I, really
<13> winmutt: no it doesn't... It does not know, who am I?
<2> Stormchaser: I being you or I being google eg self aware?
<19> randy: did you make it work yet?
<2> Google knows who I am
<2> with about 10 pages of hits to prove it
<0> we just handle a lot of statistics over several offices and the easiest way we found was this php/mysql setup with a server room somewhere miles away, which caught fire or something...
<2> and who is to say google isnt self aware
<3> so i can't imagine why this answer is so hard to find. "how to find out WHY pg_insert failed, not just IF it did"
<1> bignose_: It's not hard to find. You go to http://php.net/pgsql and discover the 'pg_last_error' function.
Return to
#php
or
Go to some related
logs:
#physics
#math
#perl
usbmon script
wwallace kanotix
fluxbox 1.0 font big
ubuntu not syncing vfs
ServeRAID 7
#php
ubuntu dmx6fire
|
|