| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Comments:
<0> tuxtheslacker: how about after your search, verify that ldap_search() isn't false
<1> b1n0ry, that'd be a good idea.
<0> tuxtheslacker: such as: if($search = ldap_search(.....)) { do this } else { print "Search Failed!"; }
<0> tuxtheslacker: if ldap_search is returning FALSE or an unprintable object identifier, then your print statement won't print anything
<0> ok, i've got to go get some lunch before i go crazy
<2> greetings. is there a definitive reference anywhere for creating a new SAPI module for PHP? or is the standard practice just cloning and hacking on an existing module?
<3> dw: ask pollita.
<2> Pollita: please see my question at 18:25 :)
<2> thanks Stormchaser
<4> Has anyone ever found an offshore development company that doesn't totally ****?
<4> like, a company with employees who were actually trained in the U.S. and speak fluent English and all that?
<5> I find such companies on this shore are sufficiently available.
<4> oh, I agree. I'm just wondering.
<6> How long has PHP been around?
<2> ^Migs^: outsource to ireland! you can pay me in potatoes
<4> I've worked with a few offshore devs that weren't too awful, but still not that great
<4> perfect. I live close to Idaho.
<6> 'cause I'm looking at a job posting that requires seven years of experience in PHP.
<5> Lone_Wanderer: ~15 years, if you count back its very first appearance in the world.
<4> 7 years?
<4> wtf?
<5> PHP4 was in beta seven years ago.
<4> well, PHP HAS been around that long, but still, that's unrealistic
<5> No it's not. I've been using it for 8.
<4> you don't need 7 years of experience in PHP to become extremely skilled in it
<5> Although I would say it's kind of silly.
<5> Exactly.
<7> they must be looking for comptability with PHP3 then for 7 yrs experiance :P
<2> php really took off with php3, and only got taken seriously around about php4 i think
<6> How big of a user base did PHP have seven years ago?
<2> and then the people laughed when php5 came around ;)
<5> Jeevesie: If that was the case, I probably wouldn't take the job.
<4> who laughed at PHP 5?
<4> I heard nothing but praise about it
<2> the new 'object model' is still as pathetic as the old one
<5> People got way too worked up about PHP5
<2> that's a subjective opinion of course, coming from a python user
<5> "Ooh, ooh, I can say 'public' now."
<8> anyone here use smarty? Yes, i know there is a smarty room, but it isnt as active as this one. Im having problems with a nested array
<6> I'd love to be able to say, "Seven years ago there were approximately X people using PHP. If you figure they're evenly distributed across the continental US, the UK and Europe, that leaves us with at most five developers in Utah with that much experience."
<4> the exception handling is too useful
<5> Lone_Wanderer: Well, populations aren't evenly distributed.. :)
<6> I know but still.
<6> I'd like some sort of quantitative way to tell him he's an idiot.
<2> MACscr: try me, i might be able to help
<6> Or something that sounds quantitative.
<7> what was the first language for web development any way? asp? lol
<6> god no
<6> probably C
<2> Jeevesie: c :)
<9> maybe perl or C
<7> hmm :P
<4> HTML
<2> the '-bin' in cgi-bin came from somewhere heh
<5> Yeah, 'binary'.
<7> thats an obvious one ^Migs^ ;)
<8> here is my php code
<8> http://pastebin.com/548671
<5> But that's just inheriting from the *nix convention of putting things in /bin;/usr/bin;etc.
<8> it creates an array with this output:
<5> It hardly implies that it's written in a particular language.
<2> ^Migs^: html is a grammar, it is a data encoding, rather than a declarative language as such
<8> http://pastebin.com/548672
<4> you can do anything in HTML
<2> no you can't.
<8> if i do a foreach loop in the template, i can output the tradenumber just fine
<10> i have it making me coffee right now
<4> yes you can
<5> "Iiiii am HTML, and I can do anything..."
<4> HTML automates most of my work
<8> but i cant seem to be able to reference teh other fields, such as pnurl and such
<7> dam i was having fun last night, made a whole template, (was viewing in FF) and had to mess round with the CSS for IE half the night
<4> does anyone here make web templates?
<2> ^Migs^: HTML is grammar for describing a tree-structured document. by itself, it can do nothing but describe document trees. it can't even colour documents by itself these days.
<8> i would rather do a section loop, but i guess i dont have my $userdata array setup to work for that
<4> you must not be very skilled in HTML, dw. Perhaps you don't have at least 7 years experience.
<5> Yeah, it's that seventh year that makes the difference.
<10> 8 gets you the coffee
<7> it's probably so they get some one older and not some young one's who know php
<2> ^Migs^: i wrote a pre-css web browser years back. like i say, HTML by itself describes a document. with ECMAscript, CSS, and DOM support in an HTML viewer, it can do an awful lot more. it still can't do anything. :)
<4> right, but it can do nearly anything
<4> that's age discrimination, Jeevesie
<4> and old people are generally idiots
<7> :)))
<2> no, it can't. it is mostly restrained either by capability or security properties of the viewer, to affecting the rendering of a tree structured document. no programming languages can 'do anything'. that was my original gripe btw, it's a very generic statement :)
<8> dw: did you by chance get to look at my code?
<4> generic but true. HTML is awesome.
<2> MACscr: having a hard time interpreting it.. the first line looks funny
<4> best programming language I know of.
<2> MACscr: is that from print_r or var_dump?
<8> thats just from the smarty debug console
<8> i can do a print_r if u like though
<2> MACscr: paste your foreach loop opening tag
<8> <!--[foreach from=$userdata item=entry key=tradenumber]-->
<8> its probably setup wrong though
<11> ^Migs^: HTML is not a programming lanuage
<11> ^Migs^: markup != programming
<2> MACscr: and you are referencing the array keys as: {$entry.pnlurl} ? (note: pnlurl, not pnurl!)
<4> I think you'd be surprised how powerful a programming language HTML can be, caffinated
<2> MACscr: also, have you changed your ldelim and rdelim?
<4> perhaps you haven't heard of a little thing called the World Wide Web
<12> ^Migs^: I think I would not call it a programming language, because it's not.
<12> ^Migs^: it's no more a programming language than XML is.
<4> I think you're forgetting that HTML stands for Hypertext Markup LANGUAGE. LANGUAGE, my friend.
<2> ^Migs^: HTML is *not* a programming language. it lacks, among other things, the ability to describe itself. you really need to learn your theory. every authoritative document you will find on HTML will describe it as a grammar. it is composed of a finite set of puntators for marking semantic information in a text document
<4> as in programming language.
<12> ^Migs^: I think you're forgetting that 'programming' appears nowhere in there. it's not a programming language.
<8> dw: yes, they delimiters have been changed
<12> a programming language infers that the language has some sort of flow control and decision logic. html has neither.
<4> I think you're forgetting the most important fact, that I'm awesome. And so is HTML. HTML is an awesome programming language.
<13> does anyone here use adodb?
<8> smarty has kind of been converted to work with the postnuke cms
<2> MACscr: so, you are referring to your variables as <!--[$entry.pnlurl]--> ? :)
<4> yeah, I use Smarty with my Postnuke site, MACscr
<2> ^Migs^: at the least i appreciate your sense of humour :p
<8> i just tried that with no success dw
<12> ^Migs^: at this point, you had best pray that my ops were removed as requested.
<4> Postnuke is a pain
<2> MACscr: are you positive you are not trying to use "pnurl"? you mentioned that a moment ago, perhaps a simple typing error?
<8> eh, not really. You just have to be familiar with it
<12> oh, lucky you
<4> meh, I'm just playing around. No need to get worked up.
<2> ^Migs^: i haven't got laid in 3 months
<8> dw: lol, it was that simple
<2> MACscr: always is. :) /me off
<14> What is the best php accelerator that has been updated relatively recently (i.e. not turck mmcache)
<8> dw: thanks a lot, really appreciate it, helped me out a ton
<13> dampjam, commercial or free
<14> FzZzt: It's for research/academic purposes, but $0 is the price we're going for
<15> Hey guys -- need to create random strings in the format of "aann" (alpha alpha numeric numeric) ie: "ja33" -- can anyone suggest a way to make this randomly?
<16> uk outgoing postcodes?
<14> ***yKen: yeah, use the random number function 4 times, first two out of 26, second two out of 10, then add the appropriate padding to make them line up to ascii (www.asciitable.com) then concat
<17> rand(1,26) for the numbers
<17> rand(1,9) for the numbers
<17> err 1,26 for the letters
<18> On my FC4 system, phpinfo says php is configured '--without-mysql' '--without-gd', yet both seem fully supported. What's the mechanism that gets around that?
<15> Jy - how do you mean?
<17> jhutchins: do you have php-mysql installed?
<17> ***yKen: if the first one is a 2 .. then 2 = B
<15> That's the best way to do it eh?
<17> echo $letterArray[rand(1,26)];
<19> Hi Folks!
<18> Jy: Yeah, that's what it is.
<15> Is the only way to make a link using a hardfile? (IE: My function generates this: ja22 -- can I make http://www.mysite.com/ja22 work without creating a file?)
<14> FzZzt: any ideas?
<18> Jy: Is that like apache modules?
<20> is file_get_contents supposed to modify the file that it reads?
<17> no fedora packages mysql as a php module
<19> Anyone ever had a problem with upload speeds using $_FILE?
Return to
#php
or
Go to some related
logs:
kpwebcast.com
#math
libgdiplus.so undefined reference
#suse
#physics
KInterbasDB+escaping
fedora audio open error device or resource busy
#css
Intel 855GME xgl ubuntu
perl regular experssions
|
|