@# Quotes DB     useful, funny, interesting





Google
 
Web www.quotesdb.info
Undernet  |  EFnet  |  Quakenet  |  Freenode  |  Dalnet  |  Ircnet  |  Galaxynet
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38



Comments:

<0> coolpix: also DateTime::Format::strptime
<1> Baaack
<0> ^Nikos: shut up. You are not answering the question.
<2> can't we just ban him?
<0> ^Nikos: the answer is str*p*time, not str*f*time.
<0> "yes"
<3> Peace at last.
<4> he couldn't catch a Clue strapped to a table in the middle of Clue mating season doused in Clue pheromones.
<3> Botje: coming to YAPC::EU ?
<5> how did you get keys from %array
<5> with foreach
<4> no, with keys.
<6> pearl jam++
<4> BinGOs: hmm. end of august.
<3> Yes. Birmingham, UK
<4> If i don't have to redo any exams, i'll try.



<5> ahh (keys %array) .. ok
<3> Well, if you are, I'll buy you a drink :)
<1> Back
<0> bah, lucky bastard getting to redo them.
<4> that'd be neat. given the (probably expensive) plane ticket i'd be buying
<3> Oh and integral, too.
<0> :-/ looks like I won't be able to go
<3> =[
<0> Botje: there's ferrys to the uk
<4> integral: well, it's not the exams i'm worried about, the damn project is.
<3> Poor show, old chap.
<0> like Brugge<->Edinburgh
<4> integral: and rely on UKs crappy trains? :)
<0> err, Zeebrugge<->Rosyth
<3> Botje: now. now.
<0> Botje: crappy *tilty* trains
<4> ah. tilty. that makes it all better :)
<3> Botje: I'll have you know that when my wife and I visited Brussels on the train, that all our UK trains were on time.
<3> EuroStar hits Calais and we get delays, because there is snow on the line ....
<0> I love the way that the only customs people who actually xray bags etc are the british ones when you *leave* the uk
<3> Like they care what you're taking out.
<7> anyone here use Perl 2 and can help me ?
<4> perl 2?
<0> HellDragon: are you serious?!
<7> yes
<4> i'm sorry, go back to the stone age.
<7> burps
<0> HellDragon: did you integrate a new metaconfig into it to get it to build?
<3> Actually, probably only worried about large amounts of money leaving the place.
<8> the 80's called, they want their perl back
<9> Wow.
<7> lol
<7> i migrated from Perl 1 to Perl 2 some weeks ago
<7> brb
<10> hehe
<3> Sun May 21 16:30:10 BST 2006
<3> ^^^^^
<3> It's 2006
<3> =[
<3> Botje: ssshhhh you are spoiling the fun.
<7> ok im back
<7> no not mod_perl
<7> Perl
<4> okay. is this a joke?
<7> no
<7> wtf Perl 2 is not so old
<0> Can I buy your time machine?
<4> nobody uses perl<4 anymore.
<4> HellDragon: ehm. perl5 came out *TEN YEARS AGO*
<0> HellDragon: 1988
<0> only two releases both in june.
<7> and PErl 1 ?
<0> releases in dec-87, jan-88, feb-88, dec-02, dec-03
<3> what platform is this on by the way ?
<7> DOS
<0> Botje: I hate to tell you this but perl's almost twenty
<4> integral: I'm still older than perl. but not by much :P
<7> its the br*** monkey
<11> perlbot: apply patch
<7> perlbot, delete database



<7> but Perl 2 beats every Perl
<7> im not going to migrate to perl 3,4,5
<2> why not?
<4> HellDragon: right. thanks for trolling. byeeeee!
<2> perl5 still p***es perl1's test suite
<10> HellDragon, you're making a fool of yourself.
<7> ?
<0> mauke_: really?
<7> i learned Perl when it came out
<2> yes
<0> did regexps change from excessive backslashes pre-1.0 ?
<2> no idea, I didn't look at all the tests
<0> oh, yes, perlhist says perl 1 changed this. perl 0 was still \(\|\)
<7> k
<0> (and perl2 introduced the current regexp engine)
<1> Term::Menu is now Publicly Available
<1> Have much fun with it! :)
<3> Been there. Tested that.
<0> dazjorz: the docs lack an example of what the output looks like, and whether the output can be customized.
<3> >P)
<1> integral: Okay, working on them :)
<0> dazjorz++
<3> DOES IT MAKE MEH COMPUTA FASTEH
<12> you need gentoo for that
<1> BinGOs: It certainly makes programming faster :)
<1> zamolxes++
<12> sorry, couldn't help it
<0> (Graham Nelson)++
<1> integral: Where should I put that in? Synopsis or Description?
<1> integral: Or a new header?
<0> Sure. "Sample output"
<1> Two spaces at the beginning of a line in POD will indicate code, right?
<0> yes
<0> hmm, I should turn my wee type checker into a MUD
<4> *blink*
<0> the relationships database is just your collection of axioms/theorems without the proofs
<8> unless, of course, alcohol is involved
<13> . o O (who needs the rigor of proofs? You might find flaws in the proof that girls are evil but would any one argue against the conclusion it draws? )
<14> For multiple network connections, which is faster, forking or threading?
<4> multiple connections doing *WHAT* ?
<15> neither
<0> EricL: Have you considered using elephants?
<14> Botje: LDAP queries.
<0> does POE have an LDAP component?
<14> Elephants like the ones with trunks?
<0> yes. They can perform one query with each limb, and for a bonus another with their trunk.
<0> An added advantage is that no one every argues when you park an elephant on their house.
<4> integral: turn that off kthx.
<0> infi: please to turn off that script.
<4> z=erljhfdsgdf
<4> DAMN TAB COMPLETION
<14> I am making large numbers of LDAP queries to different Exchange servers and I am debating parallelizing them (either by forking off process or threading it.
<4> IM GOING TO KILL IT
<13> EricL - what is servicing the LDAP requests on the backend - and have you tested how it behaves with concurrent requests?
<13> oh, so Exchange
<16> sorry
<13> and that active directory crap
<14> integral: True, can't argue with an ellephant.
<4> EricL: do one query at a time, exchange is unstable enough as it is :o)
<13> hrmm, if there is absolutely no need for the the different processes to interact with one another
<14> Botje: They go to different servers.
<13> and they are only proxying the LDAP request to 1 of many servers
<14> Its just a lot of different Exchange servers.
<13> I would say neither forking or threading
<13> just start multiple copies of the process
<0> setup your query script as an email alias, and use your mail queue runner to run them all in parallel.
<13> of course, chances are they need to all run on the same port
<14> Limbic_Region: I am not sure I understand.
<13> and they DO need to talk to one another
<13> at least to the extent that they don't overload a single exchange server
<14> Limbic_Region: I am querying like 100 Exchange servers with 1 query each server.


Name:

Comments:

Please enter the result of the sum 63 + 46 (to avoid spam):






Return to #perl
or
Go to some related logs:

dpkg configure xserver
enygmapantyhose
evenblence
knoppix + fedora core 4 + fsck + ext3-fs error
#web
smp ubuntu
debian dpkg-reconfigure lcd 910GL
#linux
gt-caffe
bitrch labs



Home  |  disclaimer  |  contact  |  submit quotes