| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Comments:
<0> BinGOs, he did not escape .
<1> BinGOs: Why? It's only some local testing. Should not harm. The tests that require internet access can be disabled in some way.
<2> probably not needed. it is inside a character cl***. the only things which have meaning in a char cl*** are ^ at the beginning, \ which escapes things, - hyphen which indicates range and the [ ] of course.
<2> rafl: some people don't have direct internet access. do your tests respect HTTP_PROXY etc ?
<0> BinGOs, oh so in char cl*** ? does not have meaning too right?
<2> why not consult the canon on this stuff ie. perldoc perlre
<3> The perldoc for perlre - Perl regular expressions, the rest of the story is at http://perldoc.perl.org/perlre.html
<2> rafl: one thing i've noticed is that they don't appear to be (m)any cpan test results for Net::SSLeay
<2> s/they/there/
<0> BinGOs, i am reading Begining Perl chapter 5
<0> BinGOs, but thanks i will do it after i done with this chapter
<2> 'k
<0> BinGOs, thanks alot for help
<2> kein problem.
<0> what is equalant for /* */ in C++ for perl?
<4> #
<4> or =for comment .... =cut
<0> redir, oh thanks
<4> resiak != redir
<0> i wanted the second one thanks resiak
<4> The latter is POD, so you'll want to read perldoc perlpod if you are not already aware of POD
<3> The perldoc for perlpod - Perl plain old documentation is at http://perldoc.perl.org/perlpod.html
<0> resiak, thanks
<5> hello everybody! Is there anybody who is absolutely happy with his (opensourced) source and bug -tracking system and it's glue?
<0> resiak, the problem is i am going by Begining Perl book and the order is different there
<4> LinuxMafia: Not a problem. FWIW, most people find in practice that # is good for regular comments, and =for comment ... =cut is more useful for temporarily commenting out blocks of code
<6> greetings
<0> resiak, yes i knew about # , but i needed to comment some piece of code temporaily , so you are right
<0> wb |RABBIT|
<6> in use base qw/A B C/;
<6> are methods always looked up first in A then in B then in C or it may vary?
<2> left to right.
<7> and depth-first
<6> lao: how is that...?
<6> B can either have a native/overriden method or not
<6> and then it will look in the ISA of B or...?
<4> Suppose A inherits from Foo. Then the lookup will go A, Foo, B, C
<4> (rather than A, B, C, Foo, which would be breadth-first)
<6> ah, terminology ****s :)
<4> Why? "depth-first" describes it exactly
<6> if you think of the inheritance chain as a whole - yes, if you see every module as a monolithic thing (as I tend to view them) then it becomes ambiguos
<6> from the master cl*** A is something that can stuff(), where it came from is relevant only from As point of view
<6> no?
<4> I don't know what you're on about, but "depth-first, left-to-right lookup" is entirely unambiguous.
<4> :-)
<6> cool, depth first it is :)
<8> hi, how to reconfigure the cpan?
<2> perlbot: life with cpan
<9> Information pertaining to the Comprehensive Perl Archive Network (CPAN) can be found at http://sial.org/howto/perl/life-with-cpan/
<8> imean i want to run change the cpan mirrors
<8> looking
<0> all : why ("{"=~/{/ ) is true? should'nt we escape {?
<0> or what we should escape inside / /?
<4> I suspect that Perl's being forgiving. Yes, you should escape {
<0> if (("ab{" =~ /\tb{/) and ("" eq "\t")) {
<0> print "it Maches\n";
<0> }
<0> resiak, that prints it Maches
<4> I say again:I suspect that Perl's being forgiving. Yes, you should escape {
<10> LinuxMafia: no it doesn't
<10> neither of those is true
<10> are you compiling perl with a quantum compiler?
<0> avar, there is a tab between "a and b
<0> avar, but some how when i pasted it , does not show it
<10> well then it matches of course
<4> avar: The point is that Perl is being forgiving about { not being escaped, surely?
<10> { is not considered a range unless it has a matching }
<0> avar, oh
<0> avar, is that correct about "[" too?
<10> in fact it doesn't turn into a range if the content of {} is does not match [0-9,]+
<4> That offends me at some level :-)
<10> and even then there are exceptions;)
<0> hum it makes me confused
<10> then escape {} and [] and avoid the confusion
<0> avar, no i want to know the facts
<4> He just told you the facts
<0> resiak, i got that
<10> LinuxMafia: read perldoc perlre
<3> The perldoc for perlre - Perl regular expressions, the rest of the story is at http://perldoc.perl.org/perlre.html
<0> avar, i am actually reading it
<10> start at "If a curly bracket"
<0> avar, so if ("1{51}" =~ /1{51}/) is not true
<10> yes
<0> avar, this -->'housecat' =~ /${foo}cat/; # matches
<0> made me confuse
<0> so if we have $befor { it count as variable ? right?
<10> LinuxMafia: what does $foo contain?
<0> house
<10> then how is that unexpected?
<0> $foo="house"
<0> avar, {} made me a little confuse
<10> ${foo} is another way to write $foo
<10> you can use it for stuff like ${"variable with spaces in it"} = 5,
<0> wow that is really cool
<10> and m// is interpolated
<0> thanks alot
<0> i coninue reading
<0> thanks
<10> perldoc a
<10> perldoc foobar
<0> avar, it gives me error --> my ${variable with space in it};
<4> note that he quoted the variable name
<0> resiak, that gaveme error too
<0> hi avar
<7> LinuxMafia, don't do that; it's called a symbolic reference, and you can't use them under strict anyway.
<11> when you write a new package, that uses another one as base [like a derived cl***], is it possible to call the inherited function in an overload?
<0> lao, if i remove the strict , it will work?
<11> i mean, if i am rewriting new(), can i call the old new() from the base package?
<7> LinuxMafia, no it won't. and don't do that.
<0> lao, ok thanks
<7> PM^, sure, qualify with package name and p*** $self
<4> or use SUPER, and do it properly
<12> PM^: perldoc perlobj search for SUPER.
<3> The perldoc for perlobj - Perl objects is at http://perldoc.perl.org/perlobj.html
<11> ok, SUPER seems to be the way, thanks
<11> resiak: is there anything you think i should look out for?
<4> PM^: Oncoming traffic
<11> one more detail... i will try to call SUPER::new() from a rewritten new()
<11> but references are not blessed yet
<11> i ***ume that's going to be a problem
<11> isn't it?
<1> BinGOs: The latter is caused by the ****ed up distribution name.
<1> BinGOs: That'll be fixed with the next release.
<1> BinGOs: Re HTTP_PROXY: Afaik we don't do that currently.
<2> rafl: yay \o/
<13> is there any functions or modules (well i am sure there are just dont know any) to compare dates and to convert date in dd-mmm-yyyy format into something workable ...
<14> DateTime generally
<14> does everything, with a very nice api
<13> wolverian, thanks
<13> wolverian, still around?
<14> yes
<13> can date time convert date string above into an object without need to split it? And if not, would you recomend using datemanip or anything else, etc?
<13> can't seem to find conversion methods in its API
<15> Sweet mother of god why can't websites figure out that people don't give a **** about flashy graphics.
<13> ew73, browser issues ay lol
<14> Chameleon22, http://search.cpan.org/dist/DateTime-Format-ISO8601/lib/DateTime/Format/ISO8601.pod
<16> wolverian's url is at http://xrl.us/j38y
<15> No, ATI's website spends far, far too long loading flash animations that you *have* to load before things like navigation shows up.
<14> Chameleon22, the parsers are provided in separate modules. see datetime.perl.org
<17> how can I trim a string to a given length?
<13> wolverian, thanks
<18> hello :)
<10> flash ****s
<10> It's not std
<18> in perl we have only cl*** per file ?
<18> does we have only cl*** perl file in perl?
<18> blah!
<18> per file i mean :)
<18> ?
<10> Perl is not Java
<18> hm
Return to
#perl
or
Go to some related
logs:
#fedora
perl readdir Bad file descriptor
openssl wampserver
gtkatlantik
unknown frontend apt OR synaptic
Telephone DOALOG
#gentoo
#gentoo
ubuntu remove language packs
chroot /mnt/sysimage input output error
|
|