| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Comments:
<0> honestly, all that is needed is Array::PAT
<1> GumbyBRAIN, Nos Feratu Dos Si Est Yo Quero taco bell
<1> GumbyBRAIN???
<2> Shadda: Yo yo yo.
<1> lol
<3> several of the MoreUtils are listed in List::Utils as rather easy to implement i believe
<4> i've a file with couple of lines, in the first line i must extract the package name, and in the second line of this couple i have to extract a number... is possible to write a regexp for this things?
<5> hey all if I wanna link a perl app to a mailer, what module should I look at
<6> does anyone know of a statistics module for perl? something that can easily draw numbers from a normal distribution for example would be useful?
<7> prism: too vague, spammer.
<8> Statistics::Descriptive
<7> ror: search.cpan.org
<5> sili_, what the hell?
<7> prism: wtf?
<5> why did you just call me a spammer im only making my website email new users
<6> yeah I googled at the same time as asking, I should really have let the google result page finish loading o0
<7> prism: your question is still vague. i don't know what you mean
<5> ...
<7> ...
<7> merlyn loves ...
<9> mashed potato!
<7> mashed cauliflower
<7> it can be made to taste almost like potato, but nt
<9> I don't think badger likes that
<7> badger loves all mash.
<10> integral, you must know PDL
<9> no, I do not know PDL.
<7> pdl is for crazy people
<9> I also do not know why my 8250 code isn't working right.
<7> integral: pebcak. always.
<7> jsn: perl mailing lists dude.
<0> jsn: hello there
<7> jsn: even perlmonks
<9> my code appears to do all the same handwaving as linux even
<11> hi
<11> is there a simple procedure that combines 2 arrays into one?
<12> combine in what way?
<9> mun: combine in what way?
<12> concatenate?
<13> sub cat { @_ }
<11> yes
<12> heh
<13> :o)
<9> mun: you can probably use the free-theorem theorem to figure out all the possible ways
<12> @a = (@b,@c)
<7> sub cat {@_} # this tickles me for some reason
<11> that's it, thanks.
<0> mun: I suggest Array::PAT
<13> sili_: yeah
<7> i'm not sure what it is
<13> sub snail{ @_ }
<13> :)
<14> :D
<7> Array::PAT makes me sad inside.
<9> Botje++
<15> sili_: i had that on a test yesterday and neither of the two job applicants didn't get it
<15> s/didn't get/got/
<7> pravus: how to "join" arrays?
<9> pravus: they didn't get the job either?
<15> sili_: the question was: given foo(@a,@b) write foo() such that it returns the concatentation of @a and then @b;
<14> hah
<15> integral: well, we weren't hiring perl programmers... just looking for perl skills... of which they had none
<7> pravus: haha, that's a good applicant filter
<9> The killer job interview question would have to be: "What's the difference between 'catenate' and 'concatenate'?"
<12> same as the difference between "chili" and "chili con carne"
<9> vegetarians?
<7> haha.
<15> integral: ARGH!
<12> the best chili I've had was in new york city, of all things
<12> second best was here in burbank
<14> thanks for that usual piece of information
<6> what's the proper name for using a variable in a different variable name so I can look up the proper documentation?
<9> ror: soft reference, but don't do that...
<9> perlbot varvarname
<16> Why it's stupid to `use a variable as a variable name' - http://perl.plover.com/varvarname.html
<6> lol ok
<6> what should I use instead? just arrays?
<9> or hashes.
<9> "Hashes not stashes".
<12> definitely don't do that.
<12> hashes
<12> yes. hashes not stashes
<9> implement your own hashes using vec
<12> don't let your data become code. don't let your code become data.
<12> the security mantra
<9> And always brush after every meal.
<12> with a comb!
<10> It wasn't painful, it was very, very expensive.
<10> Well, the pulling wasn't that expensive, but the replacement will be thousands.
<9> find a dead tramp?
<17> When I had my wisdom teeth out, one had rotted. The dentist would be like *pliers* pry pry *distressing CRUNCH* *chisel-looking-thing* *pliers* repeat
<10> My wisdom teeth came out perfectly healthy.
<13> ew73: been there done that
<17> Thank god painkillers work well on me.
<13> but it wasn't even a wisdom tooth
<17> Botje: It was awesome 'cause the dentist was a little asian woman, and you could just tell she was >< this close from powering up and wtfpwning my mouth with a kamekame blast.
<13> lol
<11> hi.. i'm trying to split strings that are in the format of "foo bar", "[foo bar] baz", "foo [bar baz]", and "[foo bar] [baz bay]" into two, i.e., {"foo", "bar"}, {"[foo bar]", "baz"}...{"[foo bar]", "[baz bay]"}.. i'm using Regex::Common::balanced, but it seems to return the entire string "[foo bar] [baz bay]" if that was given. Am i missing something?
<9> ah ha! I think I've found my bug. it's fun and interesting, and due to having just one interrupt line, but multiple priority interrupts
<9> so you have to keep poking the chip until it's told you about *all* the interrupts
<13> lol
<9> If PFGAs were cheaper we could all just design perfect bug-free easy to program chipsets!
<18> s/PFGA/FPGA/
<9> mun: while (/\G(?:\S+|\[[^]]+\])/g) { }
<13> integral: please tell me you copied that from somewhere.
<9> nope! but considering my typo above I'm sure it's broke
<13> well, the \S+ will take precedence over the second branch
<13> always
<9> see? :)
<9> mun: swithc the branches of the |
<11> ok thanks
<9> mun: of course you can use Regexp::balanced inside the [] branch too
<11> but, just for curiousity, can i get Regexp::balanced to split "[foo bar] [baz bay]" up?
<9> oops, I mean Regexp::Common::balanced
<9> hmm, no idea.
<11> yeah, that's what i meant too
<18> you should be able to just fine. Just use [] as your delimiters that need balancing.
<9> I thought the problem was that it considers "()()" balanced (also: "(()())")?
<18> I haven't used RE::Common in a while but I seem to recall that you can twiddle the greediness.
<6> is there a quick way to sum all the values in an array?
<9> ror: List::Util::sum
<11> hmm..
<9> my$s=0;$s+=$_for@a;
<9> my$sum=do{my$s=0;$s+=$_for@a;$s}; # more useful imho
<11> i'm using ./$RE{balanced}{-begin => "\""}{-end => "\""}{-keep}/
<6> thanks
<11> oops, that was from another line
<11> change to [ ] respectively
<18> oh, Regexp::Common::balanced works just fine. (as I think it should anyway)
<9> mun: use \[$balanced_bit_here\]
<18> perl -MRegexp::Common=balanced -le '$_="[foo bar] [baz blat]"; print $1 while /$RE{balanced}{-keep}{-parens=>"[]"}/g;'
<11> PerlJam Returns a pattern that matches a string that starts with the nominated opening parenthesis or bracket, contains characters and properly nested parenthesized subsequences, and ends in the matching parenthesis.
<9> or even: \[(?:$balanced_bit|[^][])\]/
<11> it sounds like it should anyway :(
<11> let me see
<18> run the comman line I just pasted
<18> s/comman/command/
<11> okay
<11> thanks
<11> oh indeed
<11> i wonder why..
<11> i'll keep looking.. thanks a lot guys!
<19> L~R.
<14> Hail.
<13> from above?
<20> hobbs
<19> Botje: where else does hail come from?
Return to
#perl
or
Go to some related
logs:
make menuconfig processor core duo
ldap accent collation
select_form predicate
gentoo sony cybershot kernel compile
turn off php noticesin html
suse 10.1 wifi 3945
#ldap
lcdproc irtrans
#perl
tightvnc init script
|
|