| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Comments:
<0> merlyn: It should. You could live-podcast yourself.
<1> I could do it anyway. :)
<2> you see, in the land of perl, jokes and facts are mixed.
<3> evdo is still a bit too expensive for my taste
<1> speaking of which, show number 8 went live today
<2> so, you A it's a humor, while to B may be considered a serious fact.
<1> I have three more in the delayed-release pipe
<0> Oh sweet pickle jesus.
<1> xahlee - you are easily confused, apparently.
<0> I told gmail to enable pop, configured the client, and now.. it's downloading all 7,233 archived messages.
<4> cfedde: yeah. Now that I don't live in the boonies, I could get good service, but the monthly fees are just steep
<1> but yes, there's a culture here. a lot of background of connectedness
<5> ew73: hurray! you'll have your inbox empyt in no time
<1> and some of us don't mind not immediately getting the joke
<5> (why does gmail support POP,and not imail?)
<1> but that's true with any mature culture
<2> there are more than one way to do it. Is that a joke?
<1> depends on how you look at it
<6> no, there really are
<7> xahlee: It is when you say it like that.
<3> ISP's love POP and hate IMAP.
<1> you need to have context
<5> hehe -- he said "do it"
<0> It's not a joke, it's poor grammar.
<4> "There's more than one way to do it, which is a good thing because most of them ****" is a tongue-in-cheek observation of real life ;)
<7> It gave me copters.
<2> perl is a great language. Is THAT a joke?
<4> I don't recall for certain who it's a paraphrase of though.
<7> No, that's a fact
<1> xahlee - you're trolling now
<1> I don't recall if you told me to remind you when you're trolling, but you are. :)
<2> yay, i'm trolling now!!
<3> Sturgeon's law
<0> As to why gmail supports pop and not i(mail|map), I would guess it has something to do with gmail's unique "we don't do folders" paradigm that would make imap folders.. interesting.
<4> cfedde: nono. This is a specifically perlian version
<4> I'll eat ANYTHING that's BRIGHT BLUE!!
<1> xahlee - when you say things for the emotional reaction, rather than to actually learn something, you're trolling.
<7> PUPPIES IN MEAT GRINDERS
<1> I don't think you'd actually learn *anything* no matter what our answer to that would be.
<4> cfedde: sorry, xahlee's last reminded me of Zippy
<2> merlyn: is perl taught around the USA for philosophy majors yet?
<5> so you're not gonna finish the rest of that?
<3> we have no zippy bot here.
<1> if you had a purpose in that question, you could share it with me, and I can get a better understanding of why you ask those things.
<3> yow!
<3> there is just no here here.
<1> actually, any of those last three questions
<2> i just got a idea. We have scientology, why don't we have a perlogy?
<1> what's the *purpose*?
<1> ok - that's 4 now. what's the purpose of this thread?
<0> merlyn: To wait under the bridge and eat any llamas that p*** over?
<2> perlogy or perloloy?
<8> ingy's dt net clan is almost religious.
<5> perloli ? What a disturbing concept...
<2> oops: perlogy or perlology.
<8> pierogieology
<2> i think we can integrate one of this term into some future perl product
<1> perlogy = science of Perl? I don't think it needs a separate "science"
<1> or is that "knowledge of Perl"
<1> I can't remember enough greek
<1> it's all greek to me.
<5> merlyn: of course not. "religions" get all the tax breaks,not "science"
<2> merlyn: consider it: whichever you interpreted it, will be a good choice.
<8> Perl code runs faster if you write it like lisp. Why is that?
<1> xahlee - is your intention to communicate, or har***?
<2> this way, perl will also acquire a touch of oriental philosophy.
<8> merlyn: Har***. Charlie's a known net.kook.
<2> or rather, zenism.
<7> Perl is as oriental as chop souy!
<3> in soviet perlistan there is more than one way to do you!
<7> suey?
<4> netsplut.
<4> goddammit ;)
<1> split happens
<1> {brace yourself}
<4> oh nevermind. That's just the other side of it :)
<3> freenode is the new dalnet
<4> cfedde: were you not around when freenode was OPN?
<3> hobbs: I'm not smart enough to know what that is.
<1> de-split happens
<4> cfedde: Open Projects Network (openprojects.net)
<1> we welcome our robot underlords!
<0> HEIL
<4> cfedde: _that_ was splits city
<1> UML book!
<3> uml.. har har. Pay your programmers to draw stick figures.
<1> and don't forget the "internet cloud"
<1> every UML diagram has to have the internet cloud
<1> even if it's a cl*** layout
<0> I hate this project /so/ much.
<1> ew73 - you need to listen to code monkey
<0> I will put all of the cl***es in an internet cloud, as it is a web app!
<4> cfedde: also they had a bunch of better authors for server names that don't exist anymore ;)
<2> ok. a change of topic, has anyone used xoops?
<0> code monkey say maybe manager want to write god damned login page himself?
<1> yes
<1> that song is stuck in my head now
<1> having discovered it only a few days ago
<1> ... http://www.jonathancoulton.com/2006/04/14/thing-a-week-29-code-monkey/
<9> merlyn's url is at http://xrl.us/oydq
<0> I like most of that guy's stuff. The "Ikea" one is awesome, too.
<1> Yup
<1> the cover of baby got back is good too
<4> cfedde: Cliff Simak, David Brin, Ray Bradbury, Carl Sagan, Scott Card, Robert Forward all used to have OPN servers ;)
<3> "which is the cl*** we're sweeping all the unknown functionality today?"
<1> not quite as good as all of Richard Cheese stuff
<1> but close
<1> the Util.pm module!
<1> I always know when I see one of those, it's gonna be a LONG code review.
<1> Randal's Code Review tip # 43.
<1> that, and a few uses of eval $string in the first ten pages.
<4> cfedde: now we've got Dan Brown. DAN BROWN!
<1> gonna be a LONG code review. :)
<3> release the Util module to cpan. then we can just use it.
<1> heh
<1> Acme::Util
<1> contains *every* other *subroutine* that doesn't already have a module
<3> ratz! it's not there.
<1> I should release that. Take every subroutine from every column I've written. :)
<0> you say no thank you for the soda, soda make you fat.
<1> can you imagine the test cases for Acme::Util ? :)
<0> Hey.
<0> At least you're not drawing ****ing stick figures.
<3> package Acme::Util; sub AUTOLOAD { 1 }; 1
<1> Code Monkey is the theme music for thedailywtf.com
<1> stick ****ing figures :)
<0> ..Mr. Slave?
<10> Hrmm, to return to my earlier problem. Is there any easy way to make Text::Wrap think certain embedded patterns like <blue> or <anythinglikethis> don't matter in regards to the length of a line?
<3> I've never had enoug guts to use enhanced emoticons.
<1> replace them with a zero-width-***ertion. :)
<4> dabreegster: I took a look earlier
<10> The code for the Wrap() sub isn't exactly intuitive.
<1> (?{"<b>"}) :)
<11> anyone know of a good read that gives advice on creating network protocols?
<0> Bless you.
<3> :-( 8--
<4> dabreegster: and I think you're best off rewriting wrap ;)
<10> How to restore them? I could just take them out, but them putting them back in is... nasty.
<10> hobbs: Woo. I would've thought some HTML parser would've done something like this already.
<10> I guess it can't be *too* hard.
<1> replace the last char of the previous word with a utf-8 char in the private-use area to hold the tag
<4> dabreegster: HTML parsers don't generally do line-wrapping. Or handle things that aren't HTML ;)
<1> then unmap it later
Return to
#perl
or
Go to some related
logs:
pinoyunderground font
Brainfuck JLouis
#math
fixing fucking overscan
restart crontab ubuntu
#perl
#linux
#debian
renice itself bash
install mttcorefonts
|
|