| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Comments:
<0> feb 08, 2007 07:49 am est; dew point: 1 f (-17 c); pressure (altimeter): 29.88 in. Hg (1025 hpa); pressure tendency: 0.04 inches (1.3 hpa) higher than three hours ago; relative humidity: 55%; sky conditions: overcast; visibility: 3/4 mile(s); weather: 6 f (-14 c); wind: from the original intention of purchasing a wii.
<1> GumbyBRAIN: that's not exactly what I had in mind...
<1> wow
<2> gumbybrain: phoenix
<0> cpan - tom phoenix - "inside.
<3> GumbyBRAIN: excuse me?
<0> Damn me for a month to reply to me at least 3.
<1> GumbyBRAIN: kcbanner
<1> darn, delay
<4> GumbyBRAIN, k
<0> $Msg = pack (a 4 5 4 2 4 4 4 4 2 4 2 4 4 5 4 2 4 4 4 5).
<1> kcbanner: heh, how appropriate
<4> lol
<4> How am I supposed to fix an error where it cant find *nothing*;
<1> GumbyBRAIN: find *nothing*
<0> Thanks for nothing.
<4> I fixed it
<4> apppparently ClientInputFilter cant be used on its own it needs ClientOutputFilter
<4> or you can just use ClientFilter
<1> ah
<1> cool
<1> GumbyBRAIN: pat kcbanner on the back for a good job
<0> I'd go for the job.
<1> close enough
<4> GumbyBRAIN, thanks alot!
<0> Alot of these ivory-tower theories of pure capitalism than the std deduction.
<4> lol
<4> if ((!defined $data_type) || (!defined $sub_type)) {
<4> that keeps working even though htose numbers are both defined
<5> Hmm... I've installed Smart::Comments from CPAN but it won't interpret the <> symbols like <loc>. Anyone else experience this?
<4> GumbyBRAIN, experience
<0> Withouth making alot of sql injection experience.
<4> GumbyBRAIN, injection! HA!
<0> Ha ha ha!
<4> eval: 1 && 1
<4> Khisanth, unban buubot please
<4> pleasey*
<6> kcbanner: Compile error (Your codez are REJECTEd)
<6> See I help, let me do it
<4> bah why!
<4> if ($data_type && $sub_type)
<6> GumbyBRAIN, why?
<0> Why would a dongchuck chuck if a scalar is.
<4> its not exectuting
<4> even though both those vars are defined
<4> GumbyBRAIN, dongchuck
<0> Im not sure what would happen if a dongchuck chuck if a perl date problem, change out your entire perineum up to given size. Is there an upper limit too ?
<6> What are their values?
<4> lik 64401 and 1
<7> "kcbanner" at 142.161.108.101 pasted "problem" (1 line, 19B) at http://sial.org/pbot/22919
<8> crunge: S::C uses source filters. Source filters do not always work.
<4> well my ip is not 142.161.108.101
<8> crunge: My advise is to avoid source filters.
<8> Advice.
<4> quamaretto[, thats not my IP...
<8> kcbanner: Did you paste it?
<4> my ip is 216......
<4> Juerd, no I did not
<6> It's okay, they were in the fridge, you can have them
<4> ***UAL HASARR***MENT
<4> I'm only 17 aaagh
<4> GumbyBRAIN, HEEEELP!
<0> Why would you proceed?
<1> GumbyBRAIN: hey there GumbyBRAIN
<0> there are 1000's of languages out there.
<1> GumbyBRAIN: STOP FEAKING SAYING THAT!
<5> Juerd: Well, I'm using it for debugging purposes but yeah, I understand. I found the problem though (I think)
<1> GumbyBRAIN: **FREAKING
<8> rutski: Stop feeding it then
<5> Juerd: it would appear that neither of the symbols I was using are actually in the module (loc and line) even though their in the docs within the module
<8> s/their/they're/
<4> GumbyBRAIN, GOD DAMMIT SARGEANT! SIT DOWN AND SHUT UP!
<0> I dont want it to be up and down.
<0> now you're a gumbybrain.
<1> heh
<5> Juerd: s/what/ever/g
<8> crunge: Welcome to my ignore list!
<5> thanks. Nice to be there
<1> Juerd: what? what did he do?
<1> crunge: what did you do?
<5> rutski: I didn't respond as desired to grammar correction
<1> GumbyBRAIN: tell Juerd to make nice with crunge
<0> you can do to be with!
<9> anybody can fix this proble for me http://www.perlmonks.com/?node_id=599350 ?
<8> xerophyte: You posted it on Perl Monks. Just wait.
<1> xerophyte: I'll have a look
<8> xerophyte: Actually, you already have some answers there.
<9> Juerd, true i mean they helped me to defector the code .. but i have little problem with the code .. i am new to perl the way they defector is cool .. i learned some of the missing some stuff
<1> xerophyte: use _ more; so change the names to $ssh_port and $error_state
<8> rutski: That's just a matter of preference.
<9> rutski, i mean the code already been defectored but i want the problem to be soled
<9> Juerd, see the bottom i have issue with it
<9> rutski, see the last post
<8> What the heck does "defector" mean?
<1> Juerd: no it's not; it's a matter of human beings needing spacesbetweenwordstoeasilyreadthem
<8> rutski: sshport though is clear enough. It's only two words.
<8> spacesbetween wordsto easilyread them.
<9> basically i have problem the file has #port 22 and port 4444 i need to change to port 4444 only
<8> xerophyte: Why?
<9> Juerd, the sshd_config i will be modifing sometime will have #port 22 and port 4444 or no port config .. i need to change to port any number user input
<1> Juerd: and $ssh_port is more clear and not that much harder to type. When you see $ssh_port your brain automatically picks out the concept of "ssh" and "port". When you see $sshport you have to mentally split it first, which is just annoying.
<8> xerophyte: Why (repeatedly)
<10> I'm using cpan on cygwin, I tried to use it without make but it complained when it needed make
<9> Juerd, ??
<8> rutski: Apparently my brain is smarter.
<8> xerophyte: Why do you want these changes?
<10> now I've installed make, but it still says it needs make
<9> Juerd, i want to change the port number on the sshd_config .. thats why ?? i didn't get your question
<10> is there any way to get CPAN to detect all the available utils again?
<11> kestas: change make in o conf
<10> like make, wget, etc
<8> xerophyte: Why do you want to change the port number?
<11> kestas: or rerun o conf init
<9> Juerd, ??
<8> xerophyte: And why use perl for that?
<10> Caelum: is that, cpan o conf init?
<10> Caelum: perldoc doesn't say anything about re-initing cpan
<11> kestas: perl -MCPAN -e shell then type o conf init
<12> xerophyte: why not just use the -p option to sshd instead of mangling the configuration file?
<9> Juerd, i am new to perl i wanna learn how to do stuff with perl .. my question wasn't why would i want to change the sshd port ? .. my quesiton was how can change it
<10> Caelum: cheers
<1> Juerd: well I don't know about that, because apparently it's not smart enough to realize that greatest common denominator conventions are best when writing code meant to be read by others.
<9> Juerd, do you get my need now ?
<8> xerophyte: perl -i.backup -ple's/^(\s*Port\s+)(\d+)/$1 newport/ unless /^\s*#/'
<9> Juerd, if you don't have any port in there
<8> rutski: There are people who cannot understand regexes. That's not a good reason to avoid them.
<9> Juerd, say there is no port pattern
<8> xerophyte: I don't understand half of what you're trying to say. Please ask someone else.
<11> xerophyte: there will always be a port in the stock config
<9> hmm
<5> xerophyte: If I might make a suggestion... why not just have two different config files and A) specifically start sshd with the desired config or B) softlink sshd_config to the desired config and restart sshd?
<11> that could probably be done with a negative look-behind ***ertion...
<11> but the unless is simpler to understand
<9> crunge, its not sshd problem .. its just perl problem .. trying to see if i can do, the why i am thinking
<5> xerophyte: this reduces the likelihood of blowing up your config and reduces your problem to 2 lines of shell: set the softlink, restart sshd
<5> xerophyte: very well. The softlink thing would be simpler but there's value in learning how to solve problems in complex ways
<1> Juerd: wow, so now you're reaching out for ridiculous arguments; how weak. You know very well that the large majority of Perl programmers who are worthy of the tag "programmer" are familiar with regexps. And the meaning of _greatest_ common denominator is that understand by the _most_ amount of people. So I think my point is self evident; but is your brain smart enough to see it?
<4> oh snap!
<5> There's the first insult
<8> rutski: If it's self evident, why are you still typing more about it?
<4> Juerd, ooooo
<8> rutski: Yes, separating words makes it easier to read. No, it's not necessary.
<4> GumbyBRAIN, Juerd vs Rutski
<0> there are an infinite discussion lol perl vs php.
<8> If Juerd vs rutski evaluates to perl vs php, I win.
<11> /^\s*(?<!#)\s*(Port\s*)(\d+)/
<11> /^\s*(?<!#)\s*(Port\s*)(\d+)/
Return to
#perl
or
Go to some related
logs:
#web
ubunto bashrc prompt too long
PHP shift unshift bit
ubuntu cups ugly epson
#lisp
sarge ipx starcraft
png12_0 not found kde
Xchat-gnome channels with password
what is inittab
gentoo aplaymidi doesnt work timidity
|
|