| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
Comments:
<0> references are different to pointers.
<1> jaeku: Talking about C++
<2> oh
<2> srry, just read the current page
<1> 19 main.cpp request for member `exitEngine' in `engine', which is of non-cl*** type `DaZjorzEngine ()()'
<1> engine.h: cl*** DaZjorzEngine
<0> are you mixing up . and ->?
<3> you broke it.
<1> I think so
<1> it's on this line: if(!engine.exitEngine(error)) {
<1> but engine isn't a pointer anymore, so I need . instead of ->, right ?
<0> yes.
<0> the ()() in the error looks weird
<0> I think you've just declared a local function :-)
<0> s/local//
<3> haha
<0> BIMBW, I haven't coded C++ since it became all modern like
<0> wtfdoesbimbwmean?
<1> perlbot bimbw
<1> perlbot: bimbw
<1> :/
<0> oh, "But I May Be Wrong"
<1> ah
<1> perlbot: bimbw is But I May Be Wrong
<4> added bimbw to the database
<1> perlbot: thanks
<4> If you want to thank us, help out the perl community by sending some money (even if just a couple of dollars) to The Perl Foundation. http://donate.perlfoundation.org/
<1> ...
<1> Greedy.
<3> eval: $_="BIMBO"; $_++ for 1..8; $_;
<5> hobbs: BIMBO
<6> The Perl Foundation for the Advancement of the Perl 6 Myth.
<3> ...
<7> 'and if they'd had faces, they'd have been grinning, but they didn't have faces.' - Terence McKenna
<0> EvanCarroll: look at the recent grants, lots of perl5 ones
<8> w larry
<2> hobbs: the for makes a local copy regardless of declaring it with my or not
<6> integral: ... Perl5 is dead though...
<3> oh dammit, yeah, shouldn't have named it $_
<3> $a="BIMBO"; $a++ for 1..8; $a;
<1> Lol
<2> still the same i would presume
<3> jaeku: no... read. :)
<7> perl5 is doomed to deprecation, not dead yet
<1> eval: $a="BIMBO"; $a++ for 1..8; $a;
<5> dazjorz: BIMBW
<1> :)
<6> dazjorz: Touche.
<2> see?
<3> jaeku: yes, do _you_ see?
<2> oh weird
<1> jaeku: Read more careful.
<3> no, not weird.
<6> After the communist pumpkin humpers remove pseudohashes the language will die.
<3> the loop variable is $_. $a is not $_.
<1> eval: $a="a";$a++ for 1..25; $a
<5> dazjorz: z
<1> eval: $a="a";$a++ for 1..26; $a
<5> dazjorz: aa
<1> boink
<2> hobbs: right
<7> a language is dead when it stops being used, for perl5 that'll be a while
<9> a decade or more
<9> why are you here?
<9> this channel is for fans
<9> and friends of fans. :)
<2> cus i have to maintain a few apps in perl
<1> jaeku: what's so bad about pelr ?
<1> perl *
<10> jaeku: If you were just a little smarter you wouldn't feel this way.
<2> and you guys rock at giving me help ;)
<10> Cubicle Origami++
<11> no.
<1> Cubicle Orgasm++
<2> bah, i hear people calling me *smart* all the time... maybe not in perl ;(
<10> jaeku: Smart people like perl. It's a proven scientific fact.
<10> Therefor, if you don't like perl..
<2> hmm, i guess i'd like to see the numbers for that one ^_^
<12> and some people that aren't smart like perl too
<13> oh, no need. the evidence is overwhelming
<14> how so.
<2> i like OO and perl ****s at OO... smart people dont use real OO?
<13> nope!
<13> only idiots in tech schools use OO!
<12> smart people like to pick what sort of OO they use
<9> perl doesn't **** at OO
<9> Perl permits all standard patterns of OO
<9> perl just doesn't restrict you to your only one form of OO
<2> that is why it ****s... it is too hectic to recycle other people's OO code
<12> jaeku: sounds like it's you that ****s at OO then...
<1> YOU LIE
<1> DaZjorzEngine engine ();
<1> the () were wrong.
<2> cus there are so many ways to inherit things, you have to look up how the parent cl*** was written to even start using it
<12> jaeku: by extending you become entangled in the implementation of the super cl*** anyway
<12> jaeku: extending breaks encapsulation in every langauge
<2> not true... java, c++, ruby you dont need to know how the parent was implemented
<12> jaeku: parent::foo, yourchild::foo <-- you need to know if that will override the parent's method and change it's behaviour
<3> jaeku: nor in perl if you do things nicely :)
<15> c++ and java aint as pretty as perl
<12> it's puuurdy
<15> and cracky
<2> perl has too much cruft to be purdy
<12> jaeku: LIES!
<13> mouth wash? were you ****ing on perl's... uhm...
<12> you're just doing it wrong
<3> jaeku: the Modern era is over.
<12> hobbs: does that mean we're post modern now?
<2> too many exceptions and hidden rules
<2> hobbs: you mean 6?
<13> not too many for us!
<12> jaeku: the exceptions are there for a good reason
<3> f00li5h: actually we're bordering on post-post modern.
<3> jaeku: what?
<2> perl6 is post modern?
<12> jaeku: and usually in the case where the version you had is useless
<3> jaeku: no, perl2 is postmodern
<13> no, perl6 is make believe
<2> threading ****s too
<12> Chris62vw: LIKE THE JETSONS!
<16> dngor: is The Duck 21+ ?
<13> haha :-)
<12> jaeku: then don't use threads
<2> sometines you need threads
<3> jaeku: nope. :)
<17> Sometimes you need a hole in the head.
<12> jaeku: when?
<2> asynchronous I/O handling with timers and what not
<2> yes, you can do it all in a main loop
<2> but it is easier and cleaner to write it in threads
<3> jaeku: so nobody wrote worthwhile computer programs in all those years before systems provided kernel LWPs?
<12> jaeku: right. POE does that for you
<9> now your credibility is lower
<2> POE? LWP?
<9> first you hae Perl
<3> jaeku: no, it's infinitely more complicated to write it in threads when you get past the academic examples :)
<9> then you think threads are cool
<9> so now you have no respect from me
<18> totally perl unrelated, but anyone here know a site to get the $ value history?
<10> Speaking of nothing in particular, what is a cool language that really supports threads well?
<3> jaeku: lightweight processes, rather than libwww-perl. :)
<10> Academic or not.
<10> __Ace__: wiki?
Return to
#perl
or
Go to some related
logs:
#math
#debian
#web
restore mdf + sql server
#php
#perl
#php
#linux
roundcube Call to undefined method DB_Error
#php
|
|