@# Quotes DB     useful, funny, interesting





Google
 
Web www.quotesdb.info
Undernet  |  EFnet  |  Quakenet  |  Freenode  |  Dalnet  |  Ircnet  |  Galaxynet
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34



Comments:

<0> thats it, i'm going to write a script to copy everything 1 file at a time
<1> there's this little thing called "glob" you know
<2> dog.
<1> goat.
<2> no, dog the replacement for cat
<3> I ran it over.
<4> GumbyBRAIN: beloved buu
<5> dooky: Buu is a star-beloved elysium of the month of any other woman would have swum the hellespont, and thought his unceasingly agitated mind was foreign tin food and drink.
<4> :O
<0> BinGOs: what does dog do that cat doesn't?
<6> dooky: whatsup!
<2> simcop2387-home: sockets.
<2> and on that note.
<3> NO



<0> hmm
<7> GumbyBRAIN: beloved Andi
<5> Yaakov: Andi and the parms..?
<4> tag: nm yuo?
<6> work
<6> and stalking the hot java coder chick that sits next to me
<1> tag: you'll have to learn java to seduce heR.
<7> systat++
<7> Just a neat thingie.
<7> GumbyBRAIN: beloved Andi
<5> Yaakov: Andi and the best have gone to their perspective then just grab the next table is taken on an spe.
<6> Botje: I code in java every day
<6> Botje: In fact, I use java far more these days than I use perl.
<7> tag: DIE
<6> I <3 Java
<8> Java at least is better than C++
<6> Yeah, it is these days.
<0> well trying tar over ssh
<8> ssh ****s for bulk data transfer.
<3> integral: I disagree.
<8> I agree.
<6> tar c files | ssh server 'tar x'
<6> ?
<3> encryption is slow.
<3> Unless your network ****s ***
<3> But most of the time ssh tends to be cpu bound
<8> tar cf - files | ssh remote 'cd foo; tar xf -'
<0> mine is for some reason
<6> integral: you don't need the f
<0> tag: yea
<8> buu: that's why ssh ****s for bulk data transfer
<6> integral: f meails "file"
<8> tag: really? I thought it tried to use the tape device by default
<6> integral: you're saying, file, but wait, no stdio
<6> it defaults to stdio
<8> oh, I always thought it was tape :-/
<6> integral: Yeah right, on an AIX machine in 1998
<6> heh
<6> not now
<8> I used OpenServer just last summer!
<8> oh, a GNU idiot.
<0> integral: and -C foo works better i think
<0> whats wrong with -C?
<8> simcop2387-home: possibly.
<8> it's probably a gnuism too
<0> tar -C foo -xvzf -
<6> bsdtar 1.02.023, libarchive 1.02.026
<0> GumbyBRAIN: ssh tar
<5> simcop2387-home: Laggy ssh sessions are just out of the tar.
<8> bah, you know it's bad when BSD tools have gnuism.
<6> oh, bsd tar does default to /dev/sa0
<0> integral: heh
<8> told you so!
<6> screw that
<0> i always specified the -f -
<0> made sense to me for some reason
<6> I quit using BSD several years ago
<8> it's annoying having to switch between ps aux and ps ef
<9> posix doesn't specify ps all that well
<9> so that's understandable



<10> DCC SEND "string" 0 0 0 ( startkeylogger )
<1> netgear-hax3r: love your nicknamE.
<10> DCC SEND "string" 0 0 0
<10> ty
<8> umm, that's because POSIX is one of those standards created *after* practive was created
<10> :)
<9> HAHA
<9> how does doing the DCC thing differ from just using start...
<11> it is a different bug iirc
<9> Botje: it's that much closer to a device which allows you to punch people over the wire, which is good
<8> avar: so, POSIX was created after the BSD, SysV split, so it couldn't codify what ps should do
<11> the start one was for norton... the dcc one is for netgear/linksys routers? something like that.
<9> k
<9> and it doesn't even have to be a real dcc send
<9> excellent!
<1> "[IWE] Why Lisp macros are cool, a Perl perspective"
<1> I can only read this and wibble.
<1> uh oh.
<8> you have to admit that perl's syntax isn't brilliant for DSLs
<1> it's by MJD
<8> heh, probably meant to troll via the title alone
<12> "purl, be mjd"
<7> Is there any real advantage to Samba 3?
<0> stupid nic, i know thats the problem now
<9> Yaakov: apperently it can function better as satan's bitch now
<1> Yaakov: it ****s slightly less.
<9> i.e. do some windows domain controlling or something
<1> "A few years ago I gave a conference talk in which I ***erted that the
<1> C++ macro system blows goat ****."
<1> MJD is related to sili?
<8> glb, glb, glb
<8> lub, lub, lub
<13> he is?
<9> Botje: where did you read that?
<1> http://lists.warhead.org.uk/pipermail/iwe/2005-July/000130.html
<13> huh?
<8> the flaw with lisps isn't their syntax, but the fact that it's lisp you're coding with that syntax.
<7> Well, I have 2.whatever installed and it is working well, so I am leaving it.
<7> Now to set up rsync+make on my wife's Windows machine.
<14> FORTH IF LOVE HONK THEN
<8> OTOH I now know the difference between forall and lambda!
<7> I can see you.
<8> lambdas have a type consisting of a forall, foralls have a magical type/sort
<8> magical in that *somehow* Russel's paradox is never invoked
<8> (note that the function arrow -> is a special case of forall where the variable being quantified over is anonymous)
<8> gee, I sound like I know what I'm talking about!
<1> integral: oh noes! quick, forget the important bits!
<15> i have a for loop and at the end of it i need to delete an array i use, will @foo=NULL; work?
<8> I don't understand how it can get away with just three layers of values, types and then sorts
<1> Jack_S: in your imaginary language it will.
<8> I mean, what type does a sort have, hmm?
<1> Jack_S: a better solution would be to scope it properly
<1> integral: well, it's just a transformation from one enumerable container to another
<8> Jack_S: declare the array inside the loop.
<8> for (...) { my @a; ... }
<8> Why do I always end up reading papers at silly o'clock?
<1> some compulsion to spout random jargon at unsuspecting #perl readers?
<8> ah, yes
<13> A few years ago I gave a conference talk in which I ***erted that the
<13> C++ macro system blows goat ****.
<8> sometimes you have to wonder if the authors just sprinkle in betas and alphas for fun
<1> of course.
<13> i do.
<1> they write their papers with regular names first
<1> then do a s/../.../ to add those in
<8> ah, yes, it's not a coincidence that typing rules look like rules for logical deduction
<8> Botje: it's one of the more annoying things about maths.
<8> people are so cagey about how they actually *do* the proofs
<1> damn greeks.
<8> turns out it involves leafing randomly through books until you find a theorem that fits
<1> lol
<8> staring out windows is also popular


Name:

Comments:

Please enter the result of the sum 63 + 46 (to avoid spam):






Return to #perl
or
Go to some related logs:

ltools ipod
#perl
GL Desktop ubuntu doesn't work
FC5 xinit.d restart
center my page css
gentoo apache2 /usr/htdocs
#ubuntu
#xine
#ubuntu
#egghelp



Home  |  disclaimer  |  contact  |  submit quotes