| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Comments:
<0> or they never use anything in the current dir?
<0> or they use FindBin
<0> or perhaps they muck with @INC somehow?
<1> they all use the same modules
<0> I can't tell
<1> ok ok
<1> thx, will mess around some
<0> or they chdir to their script location
<0> or they chdir to some defined dir
<0> really... somehow they work
<1> none do
<0> don't ask me.
<1> heheh, k
<0> you'd have to pay me to look at your scripts
<2> anchors it with pos(), but you don't call pos anywhere in your script?
<0> pos() is always set to the end of the previous match
<0> well - sorta
<0> but that's the gist
<2> so using \G will global searches to act differently?
<0> it anchors things
<0> it's like ^ but it moves
<0> "global searches act differently" when you change anything. :)
<2> ok, so it anchors it to the value of pos(), which is set to the end of the previous match
<0> ... /abc/ acts different from /abcd/
<0> so I can't interpret your statement. :)
<3> there is a whole section in the camel about this
<0> right. if you use \G, then you are ***erting that to match, that must be at the previous ending
<3> and it does a much better job at explaining it
<0> better job than what?
<0> than I can do in IRC in 30 seconds?
<3> YOU!
<0> certainly
<0> but give me a half hour and a chalkboard... and it'd be very different story
<0> so please don't make this personal.
<3> you're inability to memorize the camel is lame.
<0> heh - I've never memorized the camel. I've just *written* it.
<3> this is definitly personal.
<2> i almost misread that as "mezmorize a camel"
<3> perl's regex are weak anyway, you're better off using a real language like VB6
<0> ECarroll - you're clearly entitled to your opinion, but I'd check the spelling of "you're" in that previous sentence before casting stones.
<0> and being a troll here doesn't earn you many points.
<3> i have plenty of points, i buy them on ebay.
<4> no doubt with your vb6 sniping code
<5> a+++ ebayer, would do business again
<6> what is ECarroll talking about?
<4> lightning-fast shipper
<4> :)
<2> ah, i finally get \G
<3> mmap_: Congrats.
<2> werd
<6> I think I need a nap.
<6> I will be back later, as if any of you care. :P
<0> you'll probably be back later in spite of some of us caring. :)
<3> we don't.
<0> We know the 17-year old from texas doesn't care. :)
<3> ...
<3> 17?
<0> Based on how you act, yes.
<3> Profound.
<0> not old enough to have gotten laid, anyway.
<3> ... Insecure remarks at others ***uality, very mature...
<0> No - I make no claims to your ***uality, just frequency. :)
<0> For all I know, you could prefer guys.
<0> I really don't care.
<3> s/***uality/frequency/
<3> merlyn: I prefer goats and midgets.
<0> Helluva party that must be.
<0> Is that legal?
<3> In texas.
<0> I would imagine Texas to be conservative
<0> land of Bush, and all that
<3> The midgets usually are.
<3> merlyn: Are you married?
<0> Nope. And I won't ever be.
<0> Unless it's to get residency status in Brazil. :)
<0> I'm far too much of a tomcat, promiscuous to the end.
<3> Fun!
<3> What a crazy perl-programmin' swinger.
<3> i envy you.
<0> My dad is married to his 13th wife right now. I'm trying to help manage the average. :)
<3> wtf 13th
<0> between the two of us, we've been married 7 times each. :)
<3> thats awesome!
<3> hahah
<0> Counting my two brothers, that brings it down to 3 each. :)
<3> Your dad more than one-upped henry the 8th
<0> A couple of them are repeats though
<7> iirc, texas won't give you a marriage license after 8
<0> my mom was #6 and #8
<0> and #7 was also #9
<3> no ****ing way.
<0> Yeah - he got a bit indecisive for a while
<0> #11 wanted to set me up with her sister
<0> that would have made me my own uncle.
<3> merlyn: If you decide to write non-perl books atleast you have material.
<0> When I write my autobiography, they'll put it in fiction. This is the goal.
<3> lol
<3> though that plan didn't work for the Bible.
<8> merlyn: :-)
<0> It wasn't exactly an autobiography for the bible, nor *planned* to go into fiction.
<0> so I'm not sure what your analogy is there, sir.
<0> good comedy needs both the fact, and then the twist. it can't all be twist. :)
<8> merlyn: he means that the Bible is not considered fiction by some despite the fact it obviously is.
<3> It was filed as fiction for hundreds of years
<0> I don't care about the people who consider it fact, but I do care about the people who care about what *I* consider it.
<3> then constantine ****ed it up.
<9> dammit I've been 25 for nearly two minutes now :(
<0> It's unfortunate that a number of them call themselves "followers of christ"
<3> blondie: Congrats.
<0> blondie++
<8> blondie: Mazal Tov!
<9> thanks
<0> now you're 26
<8> perlbot: karma blondie
<9> lol
<10> Karma for blondie: 2
<3> blondie: Celebrate it buy hanging out on #perl (joking)
<8> blondie++
<3> by*
<11> Is there an "apropos" type of functionality to perldoc?
<0> not directly rutski89
<3> perldoc -q
<11> and no, I don't want to use perldoc -q
<0> but keywords in the perlfaq can be looked up
<11> ECarroll: lol, yea; I knew someone would say that
<0> but not the rest of the reference docs no
<11> yea :(
<0> that's what google is for. :)
<11> lol, yea
<8> rutski89: you can grep the perl*.pod directory.
<0> apparently - windows people get a better help system than we do
<11> rindolf: yea, i'll probably learn to start doing that
<0> don't sing to yourself! sing out loud! be proud!
<0> and then be sure to write the check to the Hills because you used "their song"
<4> he he
<8> /~ Sing... Sing a song... ~/
<0> it's like the movie "happy birthday to you" didn't use the song, because the estate that owns the song rights wanted too much money
<4> merlyn: what's the royalty for a small private party?
<0> not sure
<4> that song has what ... like one verse?
<3> perl_contractor: You misunderstand the depth.
<0> ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Happy_Birthday_To_You
<11> eval: print 10**-9
<12> rutski89: 1e-09Return: 1
<11> how do I get that to print the actual number?
<0> ... The company holding the copyright was purchased by Warner Chappell in 1990 for $15 million dollars, with the value of "Happy Birthday" estimated at $5 million.
<11> I mean, in standard decimal notation
Return to
#perl
or
Go to some related
logs:
ubuntun dual display
#kde
ubuntu set mtu interfaces
ubuntu failed in buffer_read(fd)
suse10.0 pakages
#oe
fedora change desktop fvwm
#lisp
nx7010 heat warp ati
firefox emerge pangoxft
|
|