| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Comments:
<0> Yes, hit the wheel as hard as you can.
<1> mauke: I remember an option for right-mouse vs. middle-mouse, but it doesn't seem to exist in the *nix version and I lack a windows machine
<2> oh i found it
<2> but you can't disable it
<2> you could only switch it
<2> between middle extendds and right pastes
<3> Someone at 62.253.0.10 pasted "been trying to get this program to work, it seems to compile and run but nothing is posted, it does print success at the end but nothing is posted" (25 lines, 453B) at http://sial.org/pbot/17478
<4> right extends, middle pastes is obviously correct
<5> I have updated it at http://sial.org/pbot/17478
<2> what does that mean, right click exxtends
<4> well, if you select something with the left button, you can use right click to extend the selection
<5> it is still saying success, yet I see nothing
<4> try left-clicking here ->* then right-clicking *<-there
<6> Try this one: perl -we 'use PDL; use Math::Trig qw(atanh !atanh);'
<7> my coworker
<7> just said something hilarious
<8> want to let us in on the joke?
<7> it won't be *as* funny because of the lack of context, but basically
<7> what's the difference beween a girlfriend and a wife?
<9> your stuck with a wife?
<7> nope
<7> try again
<10> "getting to have ***" with one, "having to have ***" with the other
<7> bzzzt. try again
<10> TCO?
<7> bzzzt. try again
<7> ok i'll tell you
<7> what's the difference beween a girlfriend and a wife? about 45lbs
<11> :)
<9> ouch
<10> lol
<12> 'getting *** with one', 'wanting *** with the other'.
<7> it was hilarious because it was so perfectly delivered
<11> oldie but goodie
<7> my grandpa said to marry someone with nice legs and a pretty face
<13> thrig: how's your interviewing going?
<7> interview me
<6> hobbs, ? mauke ? Try this one:
<6> perl -we 'use PDL; use Math::Trig qw(atanh !atanh);'
<4> I don't have PDL
<1> why would you do that?
<6> All warnings were suppressed.
<6> Well, maybe you are importing based on variables that are p***ed in? I couldn't say.
<6> It was just weird.
<1> jsn: er...
<1> that's because it's effectively the same as 'use PDL; use Math::Trig ()'
<1> i.e. ask Math::Trig to export _nothing_
<6> oh!
<6> :)
<6> I blame summer heat and Usama bin-Laden and the lack of liberal support for His Excellency, the President of the United State (AND Commander-in-Chief) Georgious Maximus
<14> Don't forget m***ive voting fraud, and the shadow government.
<15> hmm
<15> anyone familiar with https?
<13> it's gonna ****ing rain
<15> **** rain
<15> har har har
<13> sickli: who the hell are you
<13> lyy: I'm familiar with SSL...and familiar with HTTP...why?
<15> tag i have a webpage that requires a CA to be installed in order for it to be "trusted"
<15> tag: on the windows side, it goes through a wizard that will install the cert auth for you
<15> tag: is there a to do this silently?
<15> tag: is there a way to do this silently?
<13> I have a question for you, what does this have to do with perl?
<15> oh ****
<15> wrong chat room
<15> but since the question is asked..
<16> lyy, did you mistype #ssl ?
<13> I was expecting something about LWP, maybe, or some other perl http implementation
<15> hehe
<13> or Net::SSLeay
<13> etc
<15> nope
<15> see ya in ssl
<13> Anyway, that in mind, I have another question: What do you mean by "silently"?
<13> like, in linux, as opposed to ...
<13> If you don't want users navigating to your site to be prompted
<15> tag: well, basically if you install a .crt on windows, you have to go a wizard routine to install it
<13> you need to get a signed certificate
<15> tag: exactly
<15> yes
<13> right
<15> i self sign my cert
<13> your self cert will prompt users
<13> always
<15> dam
<13> go to verisign and pay $120, or deal with it.
<13> or whatever it costs
<15> lol
<15> or hack IIS?
<13> has nothing to do with IIS
<15> ok
<13> Actually
<13> hurm
<13> Apparently you can just use OCSP
<13> now this is where my knowledge of HTTP and SSL in specific gets fuzzy, because this is more of an admin/ops thing
<13> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_Certificate_Status_Protocol
<14> Most browsers come with a list of "trusted" signers (verisign, et al), you can self-sign, but if the user doesn't trust the signer, they'll be prompted.
<13> right
<13> ew73: that's the old way, so as I understand it
<13> but it seems like the old way is still the standard
<13> as far as business practice is concerned
<14> tag: Yeah. The OSCP thing moves the actual verification work to a more distributed peer-like thing, but each client still needs to know about some "trusted" nodes or somesuch.
<13> so you go to one of: ABA.ECOM, INC, AOL Time Warner, AddTrust AB, Baltimore Cyber Trust, Comodo CA Limited, Digital Signature Trust Co, Entrust.net, Equifax, Geotrust, IPS Internet Publishing Services, GlobalSign, or Verisign
<13> ew73: Right and most browsers still have limited support for OSCP
<14> So really, just pay the $120 or deal with users getting prompted.
<13> Although the mozilla framework has full support for it, but defaultly ships with OSCP verification disabled.
<13> yeah right
<13> just pay the $120
<13> heh
<13> go to verisign
<17> I prefer the CAcert way
<17> Users get prompted now, but no longer in the near future.
<17> And it's FREE.
<14> http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_052506/content/across_the_fruited_plain.LogIn.html
<14> "Has Our Success in the War on Terror Made Bush Vulnerable on Other Issues?"
<14> Do /what/ now?
<18> ew73's url is at http://xrl.us/mvri
<19> success.
<15> tag just in case you're wondering, i'm silent cuz i'm reading that webpage you gave me
<19> die, liberal scum!
<13> lyy: I really wasn't wondering, but that's good to know
<14> thrig: Perhaps, but .. wow.
<13> thrig: How's your interview process going?
<19> done!
<13> thrig: and?
<19> I set the office on fire and ran
<13> sweet
<13> so will I be seeing you around the office soon?
<1> Did you put strychnine in the guacamole while you were at it?
<19> will have to see...
<9> is there a way to make a variable the return value of a subroutine *without* tying it?
<9> $foo = (\&foo_sub)->(); or something
<20> question lacks sense ...
<9> i bet tying is the only way...
<21> imMute: you want your variable to always call the sub when you read from it?
<9> Paladin`: yes
<21> imMute: that's what tie is for.. why would you want to do it without it?
<9> because tie is slow?
<21> imMute: so is calling a sub every time you access a variable..
<6> I'm just sort of amazed that you have a RushLimbaugh subscription, and can read the articles.
<22> imMute: so a simple subref is insufficient?
<22> eval: my $foo = sub { 'foo' }; $foo->();
<23> linuxnohow: Return: foo
<24> eval: my $foo = sub { 'foo' }; $foo();
<23> stuuf: Error: syntax error at (eval 170) line 1, near "$foo("
<9> this was an irssi script that had $config = 'blah'; i wanted to easily replace that with something that would read an irssi setting, rather than go through the whole script replacing each instance of $config with the proper code
<24> eval: my $foo = sub { 'foo' }; &$foo();
<23> stuuf: Return: foo
Return to
#perl
or
Go to some related
logs:
freebsd ndiswrapper ATI 7500
php cli bad interpreter
#bash
rm -d ext3
+ubuntu +how do i restart the network
SiS 86C326 video card resolution
webadmin ubuntu
$pty->slave;make_slave_controlling_terminal
proxy possie
reemerge xorg command
|
|