| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4
Comments:
<0> Can oe run a menuconfig? I want to use the same toolchain to configure a local kernel and it seems dirty to write scripts to use the tools from the tempdir
<0> a kernel menuconfig to be specific
<0> I tried it but it seems to try to run it in the background or something
<1> why would you want to run menuconfig? Just hack on the .config direclty
<0> why would I want to hack on the .config when I could run menuconfig
<2> nzg: for development, build your kernel outside OE, or cd into the tmp/work/... and manually build it.
<2> nzg: once you are happy with it, then store the config in the OE metadata, etc.
<2> nzg: during development of a package, I rarely run bitbake a package. See http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/OeFaq
<2> nzg: this is one of the most powerful concepts of OE. You can cd to the directory where the package is being built and run the scripts in the temp directory (run.do_configure, run.do_compile, etc).
<2> nzg: very hand for debugging where you want to change something, rebuild, etc.
<3> later
<0> That's actually what I'm doing, and I have a working .config
<0> But here's the thing
<0> I'm building the kernel external to the src, as I have to do a lot of development and it makes patch generation much easier
<0> The .config, is therefore stored in an external directory, leaving a pristine source.
<0> I want to generate a new object directory with oe.
<0> I can just copy in the .config and run oldconfig I suppose
<0> nvmd, rambing too much coffee
<4> I have a new version of linphone ready (tested in console mode, but I cannot test in GPE mode) - there is no MAINTAINER in the file.
<4> I will check it in with a DEFAULT_PREFERENCE=-1 and ask for someone to test it in GPE.
<5> RP: ping
<4> This new version, plus the new yeaphone package, will allow you to plug a usb phone into an NSLU2 and use it and asterisk running on the nslu2 to make and receive voip calls.
<4> hey mickeyl
<5> hi
<5> did anything change in bitbake regarding BB_COLLECTIONS recently?
<5> i can't seem to get my local stuff priorized
<5> it always picks the upstream collection
<5> (bitbake 1.6.2)
<6> exit
<3> mickeyl: I have not noticed any problems with 1.6.3
<5> do you have a setting where you have e.g.
<5> foo_r1 in OE
<5> and foo_r2 in local?
<5> foo_pv-r1, foo_pv-r2 even
<3> mickeyl: checking ...
<3> mickeyl: yes, I think so. tslib_1.0.bb in both trees
<5> heh
<5> exactly my test case
<5> and your local has a higher revision?
<5> and its chosen?
<3> mickeyl: yes, tslib local, PR="r2"
<3> mickeyl: tslib OE, PR="r7"
<3> mickeyl: I guess the PR is higher in the OE tree.
<5> mmh
<5> could you try bumping the local one please?
<3> mickeyl: sure
<5> thanks
<3> mickeyl: set PR="r8" in local
<3> mickeyl: yup, its building version r8
<3> from the local tree.
<3> local tree has higher priority.
<3> have to run -- later.
<5> ok, thanks
<5> so it's a local problem here
<5> cu
<5> *sigh
<5> ~shoot problems
<0> how do you pack up one in the build process
<0> specifically, my script is still buggy and it's trying to build the kernel
<0> I didn't configure it right so I modified the bb script to do so
<0> but now it just keeps trying to run do_compile and doesn't go back to do_configure
<7> bitbake -c clean
<7> bitbake -c clean package name
<0> kk, I'll try that
<0> doesn't seem to work
<7> hmm
<0> ./oe-run.sh -c clean linux do_config
<0> ./oe-run.sh virtual/kernel
<0> still restarts at do_compile
<0> want to be at do_config
<7> did the clan seem what is oe_run.sh ?
<0> sorry, oe_run is just a wrapper around bitbake that sets the path
<8> -c clean completely wipes the temp dir for that package, it wont just back up to that step
<8> but its still probably what you want
<7> what is the output of -c clean?
<7> without getting into mucking with stamps ....
<0> NOTE: package linux-2.6.19: started
<0> NOTE: package linux-2.6.19-r0: task do_clean: started
<0> NOTE: removing /home/nathan/lab/IPAC-9302/tmp/work/IPAC9302-linux/linux-2.6.19-r0
<0> NOTE: removing /home/nathan/lab/IPAC-9302/tmp/stamps/IPAC9302-linux/linux-2.6.19-r0.*
<0> NOTE: package linux-2.6.19-r0: task do_clean: completed
<0> NOTE: package linux-2.6.19: completed
<0> NOTE: build 200701311841: completed
<0> Build statistics:
<0> Attempted builds: 1
<7> ok, then what is the output when you build again?
<0> OE Build Configuration:
<0> BB_VERSION = "1.6.3"
<0> OE_REVISION = "<unknown>"
<0> TARGET_ARCH = "arm"
<0> TARGET_OS = "linux"
<0> MACHINE = "IPAC9302"
<0> DISTRO = "emac"
<0> DISTRO_VERSION = ".dev-snapshot-20070201"
<0> TARGET_FPU = "soft"
<0> NOTE: preferred version 2.5 of glibc not available
<0> NOTE: package IPAC9302-kernel-2.6.8.1: started
<0> NOTE: package IPAC9302-kernel-2.6.8.1-r1: task do_compile: started
<8> uh
<8> you're not cleaning the right package
<8> you did -c clean linux
<8> you want -c clean virtual/kernel
<8> or whatever
<7> also
<0> o
<7> ~pastebin
<8> "linux" isnt "IPAC9302-kernel"
<9> extra, extra, read all about it, pastebin is a place to paste your stuff without flooding the channel - try http://pastebin.ca, or http://channels.debian.net/paste, or http://rafb.net/paste/
<7> ~pastebin
<0> kk, srry, making a note
<0> or are you saying "not"
<7> in the future use pastebin for logs
<0> kk
<7> especially whern the channel is busy
<0> if I clean virtual/kernel will that clean it's dependencies as well?
<7> I am not sure how virtual targets work
<0> well I'll try it
<0> nope, did what I want just removed the kernel build, thx
<10> is bitbake-1.6 (SVN rev 753) broken?
<10> it just errors for me
<10> error and my local.conf is http://pastebin.ca/335237
<10> bitbake-1.6 (SVN rev 753) error and my local.conf is http://pastebin.ca/335237 Please help
<10> new setup, I'm sure I didn't something stupid, but I don't know what
<11> Zero_Chaos: perhaps you need to upgrade python or install a package
<10> JustinP: python is version 2.2... :-( too old you think? it's not my local.conf?
<12> i have build a angstrom bootstrap image does anybody know where i can find the modules.conf (modprobe.conf) ?
<12> i cant find it in /etc
<11> Zero_Chaos: you probably need 2.4
<10> fsck
<10> JustinP: thanks :-)
<10> JustinP: you were right, running Python 2.5 now, works fine. Although Psycho warns that Python 2.5 isn't stable...
<10> I'll find out I guess
<10> JustinP: thanks again
<13> morning
<14> ibot, seen schurig
<9> schurig <n=schurig@pD95FA355.dip0.t-ipconnect.de> was last seen on IRC in channel #oe, d h m s ago, saying: 'mickeyl: we're all coughing like mad, but otherwise good'.
<13> ~lart new flight taxes :-(
<15> hi all. anybody tried to build ncurses with unicode support?
<16> ~lart people which use GPG keys which are not signed by anyone
<13> hrw: OI
<16> someone here use(d) google desktop search?
<17> mickey|zzZZzz: A bit late but nothing changed with collections that I know of
<17> morning all
<18> hi hrw, RP
<16> hi pH5 RP
<16> ~lart konqueror
Return to
#oe
or
Go to some related
logs:
Denthor's VGA tutorials
ati isp sb400
php is_digit
picocom emulator
#asm
frostwire shorewall
ubuntu network install
python curses.texpad
#lisp
cdirip deb
|
|