| |
| |
| |
|
Comments:
<0> if my module takes over a packet via NF_STOLEN, how do i free the skb?
<1> i've just realized i can't use NF_CONNTRACK and nat. in fact i'd like to use NF_CONNTRACK_IPV6 and IP_NF_CONNTRACK (so that i can use NAT). is there a solution ? (i guess again, i've missed some readings)
<2> If there is a solution I would be very much interested in hearing about it.
<1> i guess sooner or later nat will work with NF_CONNTRACK (on ipv4 at least)
<2> Let's hope for sooner. :)
<3> When creating a conntrack entry using conntrack -I (or -U), I can't set the mark on the connection. CONNMARK will set the mark correctly, and the mark is included in the netlink creation message.
<3> Any ideas on why it won't work?
<4> hi
<4> why the condition patch is not ported on 2.6?
<4> or there is a similar patch for 2.6 ?
<3> I think it might have been considered useless
<4> i don't think it is useless, maybe there are other way to do the same, but i ignore how :)
<3> well, it's probably because nobody has ported it yet :)
<5> gandalf: U here
<6> we have a problem with the code u gave me yesterday Please look at http://pastebin.com/622264
Return to
#netfilter
or
Go to some related
logs:
ltsp i810 dri
#web
#math
ubuntu mysql_fix_privilege_table
#osdev
#web
#math
enable xserver
#perl
subversion darks
|
|