@# Quotes DB     useful, funny, interesting





Google
 
Web www.quotesdb.info
Undernet  |  EFnet  |  Quakenet  |  Freenode  |  Dalnet  |  Ircnet  |  Galaxynet


Comments:

<0> is a user defined chain a valid target from the postrouting chain ?
<1> yes, as long as the user defined chain is also in the same table
<0> so, to create the chain, i'd say, iptables -t nat -N user_defined
<0> if i was doing masq'ing, for example
<1> yes
<0> danieldg: thanks!



<2> gug
<3> gug
<4> gug
<2> gugr
<5> hi hidden,gandalf,octavian,rusty,jk ;)
<6> LaF0rge: hi!
<7> gug
<7> :)
<5> hi xkr.
<7> hello
<7> ugh, +0.81C here
<8> :)
<5> jk: well, it's a serious problem at this point
<8> yeah, i understand..
<8> i don't have a lot of time to spend on it either though, at the moment :(
<5> yes, unfortunately nobody has :(
<3> Hidden: what does the "r" at the end of gugr mean?
<2> Gandalf_: ask xkr47, as he's the inventor of that letter
<2> Gandalf_: I think it's 'reply', btw
<3> heh ok
<2> Gandalf_: like ping -- pong, and gug -- gugr :)
<3> or resend?
<3> ah



<3> bloody HP, they can't implement ospf correctly and now they've finally given us a crappy workaround that we can't use
<7> :)
<3> there's too little complaining in this channel...
<7> hidden was right
<3> xkr47: ok
<3> another one I wonder what it means is "mh" that LaF0rge sometimes uses
<5> gandalf: it's not an acronym. just try to pronounce it
<5> mmh.
<5> a sound you (well, I at least) make even verbally when thinking about something.
<3> ok, I thought it was that but wasn't sure, in swedish it's usually written hmm :)
<5> gandalf: in .de it's the same.
<3> the most confusing yet is the "jeje" that spanish speaking people use
<3> it's "hehe"
<2> Gandalf_: indeed
<7> Gandalf, I use "mm" :)
<7> ding dong
<1> if a TCP connection has only seen packets in one direction, is it supposed to go in the conntrack table as ESTABLISHED?
<3> if you have {nf,ip}_conntrack_tcp_loose set to a non-zero value it will, but it will be un***ured
<3> the default value is 3
<1> ok, so what does setting it to zero do?
<1> does it make those packets INVALID state?
<3> yes
<3> and only creates new entries on SYN packets
<1> is the only reason for this entry to allow connections that were pre-existing?
<3> I usually set it to 0 30min after bootup
<3> yes, for example when rebooting a router
<1> right. ok, thanks!


Name:

Comments:

Please enter the result of the sum 63 + 46 (to avoid spam):






Return to #netfilter
or
Go to some related logs:

ubuntu wd4000kD
#debian
using linux-k7
could not establish connection to sound server ubuntu
iptables --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
ubuntu device travan drive
#lisp
+etch or dapper
vhcs dns doesn´t work
#web



Home  |  disclaimer  |  contact  |  submit quotes