| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44
Comments:
<0> ok.. what do I do then?
<1> Brianetta: not necessarily
<2> Like many unix commands, no news is good news
<0> xenix, I have ubuntu on another partition
<1> that is improper information
<0> when I go to hda1 << my NTFS partition and do 'ls'
<0> nothing is printed
<3> its not mounted?
<2> emergence: You need to mount it
<0> how do I do that?
<2> Which directory do you expect to see the files in?
<0> anything would do for now
<2> OK, tell me the name of an empty directory
<4> how do i convert mp3 format to raw audio format .. so that i can just copy the file to /dev/audio to play the song... .
<0> Brianetta, how about 'xx' in the root folder in knoppix
<2> vimman: /dev/audio requires Sun au format, not raw
<2> emergence: mount -t ntfs /dev/hda1 /xx
<4> oh.. Brianetta fine how do i conver it to sun au format
<2> sox can do it, I believe
<0> wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hda1, missing codepage or other error
<4> but i guess /dev/audio required raw format initially ??
<0> :(
<0> Oh now
<0> oh no
<0> this is bad???
<2> vimman: It was the raw format on Sun Microsystems workstations once upon a time, yes
<2> Long before Linux
<4> :-)
<2> emergence: Do you have a backup?
<1> http://www.linux-ntfs.org/content/view/126/62/
<5> emergence, check fdisk -l /dev/hda1
<5> emergence, check fdisk -l /dev/hda
<4> any idea of how i convert mp3 to sun au format
<0> yes... but maybe not everything... so it's really essential to try everything to get this up
<0> I will do that now.. hda or hda1?
<5> the first hda
<5> /dev/hda
<2> !google sox
<6> What does "- |" in "mpg321 input.mp3 -w - | oggenc -o output.ogg -" mean ... ?
<2> Hmm, bot-free (:
<0> /dev/hda1 65 6438 51199155 7 HPFS/NTFS
<7> |lostbyte|, it converts mp3 to ogg. i think
<5> okay do mkdir /mnt/tmp
<2> |lostbyte|: Specifically, the - is the filename argument to the command before (means standard output) and the | feeds that output to the input of the next command in the line.
<5> then mount -t ntfs /dev/hda1 /mnt/tmp
<6> paines: :).. i figured that out too.. but that does that conversion mean ?
<0> sjappi, let me try that
<5> ok
<8> How do I know who all are logged on to my machine through ssh ? ( Not any other way like telnet etc.. )
<0> same error as before
<0> wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hda1, missing codepage or other error
<7> |lostbyte|, ahh. no i ge what you mean. the - writes to stdout, and the an other app can read from stdin.
<6> Brianetta: But "|" normally does that right ?, why "-"
<0> ok... / have to go get ready for something.. I need to leave this for tonight.. I am so scared... please someone tell me there is hope
<4> is it possible to redirect the output of mplayer (the audio output ) to a file ?
<7> vimman, mplayer -ao help. ther should be a few options, containg what you are looking for
<5> emergence, i dont think there is hope then
<9> vimman : sure. mplayer -ao help
<5> check if the module is loaded okay
<0> :(
<5> lsmod |grep ntfs
<0> oh my god
<10> emergence: what did you do to the partition?
<2> |lostbyte|: I told you
<0> ntfs 163600 1
<2> |lostbyte|: Specifically, the - is the filename argument to the command before (means standard output)
<0> mike_l, resized it using qtparted
<10> sometimes, SOMETIMES you can just put the partition back to its original size and be ok
<0> I will try this tonight.. thank you all
<2> |lostbyte|: It's not part of the | it's part of the command before
<10> but how? does you just go from block 1-50 to 1-100?
<0> I have to go now
<0> I will be back
<10> by
<6> Brianetta: And "-" in "output.ogg -"
<2> |lostbyte|: Yes, although in that case it's the standard input.
<6> Brianetta: ok ! so "-" output to the "|" and oggenc that the input from "-" which is realy the output from the first "-" .. Am i right ?
<6> that/takes
<11> please help
<11> my lsusb give me this msg
<11> [bashca@Dontay ~]$ /sbin/lsusb
<11> Bus 004 Device 002: ID 05c6:3100 Qualcomm, Inc. CDMA Wireless Modem/Phone
<11> Bus 004 Device 001: ID 0000:0000
<11> Bus 003 Device 001: ID 0000:0000
<11> Bus 002 Device 001: ID 0000:0000
<11> Bus 001 Device 001: ID 0000:0000
<11> [bashca@Dontay ~]$
<3> please dont paste flood
<3> use pastebin
<11> sorry
<12> RootHack what's the problem?
<11> i hope some 1 help me
<2> |lostbyte|: You're over-complicating it, but yes
<13> * cillian-bfs thinks set -o vi has just made his shell a much much better place to live
<6> Brianetta: Ok ! tx.
<2> cillian-bfs: Experiment with the /me command
<14> RootHack http://pastebin.com/
<13> Brianetta, oh ... thanks
<11> javiolo: ??!!!
<15> What's the best filesystem for a partition with lots of small files (like mailing list archives (Mailman), source code (cvs/svn), etc.
<15> In terms of data integrity and storage, not necessarily speed
<15> I was thinking Reiser4, but it requires a kernel patch and its prone to trashing data quite often
<16> XFS?
<15> XFS is great for enormous files, but definitely not for smaller files
<2> setuid: Whichever one you choose, you want a high inode density
<15> vmware images, iso files, yes...
<2> I'd go with ext3
<16> ext3 with dir_index then.
<15> Brianetta: Sure, should I use tune2fs on ext to do that?
<15> mmm, nod
<2> setuid: mke2fs will do it
<17> tune2fs will convert ext2 to ext3, if that's what you're asking
<15> Right, I usually use -j -m0
<2> setuid: mke2fs will do that, too
<15> Then tune2fs -Ojournal_data_ordered
<17> ah, you already know all that. I'll go back to sleep then. :)
<15> haahha
<15> I know how to use the tools, I just don't know what's best in this situation
<15> Like for example, an nntp leaf node... what fs is best there? Until recently, the only choice was ext2
<2> setuid: man mke2fs, look at the section covering -T
<15> # df -im
<15> Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on
<15> /dev/hda1 30408704 1747551 28661153 6% /
<2> search on -T fs-type
<15> ah, -T news it is then
<15> I think 4k is the default though, no?
<15> I wonder if I need smaller
<15> (4k) 24182784 inodes, 24179652 blocks
<18> !seen dami
<15> Brianetta: Is there a performance impact for the kernel/memory managing a high inode density?
<2> setuid: No, just an access time impact
<15> (2k) 12091392 inodes, 48359304 blocks
<15> Weird, with 2k blocks, there's _less_ inodes
<19> dont you just hate ms fanboys, they slate linux and open source without knowing anything about them
<2> and an fsck impact, too (:
<15> PiG_DoG: Let them be, they're a waste of your time
<2> -N can override that
<15> Brianetta: Right, but why would -b 2048 vs. -b 4096 result in less inodes?
<19> i was just chatting in Winbeta.org
<3> heh
<19> bunch of small minded idiots
<3> indeed
<3> they hate linux
<15> PiG_DoG: Brainwashed
<3> i got banned from there
<15> PiG_DoG: Let them play with their legacy OS
<17> setuid: iirc, the default block size is affected by the partition size
<18> hi all
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
debian vfs: file-max limit 8192 reached
gentoo set HWclock
#debian
#gimp
shentey
priest porn -charge -charged -police -child
#perl
ubuntu nvidia unable to open display
#debian
pivot_root debootstrap
|
|