| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Comments:
<0> lol
<1> repeat 500 times.
<0> mmiikkee12: well that wouldn't qualify as a virus
<2> no I mean i have one computer and two sets of {monitor,mouse,keyboard} and I want to make it appear as if there were two computers
<2> so that two peolpe could use it at the same time
<0> especially as the "copy" function wouldn't have any effect in the end if you keep overwriting the data in the HDD with "meow meow"
<3> Well, you can use the two monitors with xinerama.sf.net
<1> http://www.16bitos.com/ibm100_1.htm
<1> that's even older :P
<3> But that brings it all under one desktop useage.
<1> lietu, good point :P
<4> I wonder if that howto is still on tldp....
<1> do it on a floppy!
<0> mmiikkee12: well usually a virus is only considered a virus when it spreads automagically by infecting other executables
<1> ok then
<1> find all the .exe files on the hdd
<1> overwrite each one with meow meow meow meow
<1> :)
<2> Shadow_7 I want two :)
<0> mmiikkee12: no, it doesn't infect it, it effectively destroys them, infecting means that the virus code is copied in the executable
<1> ok fine, mr. specific.
<0> ;)
<1> overwrite each .exe with the virus itself \o/
<4> Pinchiukas: http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/XFree-Local-multi-user-HOWTO/index.html
<0> lol
<1> (the same file that's doing the overwriting)
<0> well that'd kinda work
<0> but most propably it wouldn't spread far
<2> Skunky thanks, but... I have to modify my kernel for that? couldn't I just run two x servers with diffrent configurations?
<0> ... designing virii aint as easy as one might think ;)
<1> ...after doing net use z: \\whatever\asdf
<1> ...and z:
<4> Pinchiukas: apparently not.
<2> Skunky why not?
<4> Pinchiukas: cuz the howto says so?
<3> It has to be polymorphic in nature, or anti-virii gets and easy block/delete.
<1> overwrite the av software!
<0> Shadow_7: well we weren't talking about anti-virii software yet
<0> just making it an actual virus ;)
<5> how is it i can change the ownership of a mounted drive?
<4> itrebal: chown?
<5> says the ownership change isn't allowed
<4> itrebal: what is the filesystem type?
<0> itrebal: what's this mounted drive you're talking about, cd?
<5> fat 32
<5> harddrive
<1> lietu: i've got it. map a drive letter to a network share with net use, overwrite all the .exe's on the local computer *and* that one, then change "Booting MS-DOS" in the bootsector to "y0\_/ |-|4\/3 b33|\| pwn3d" :D
<6> hi, i read on an (old) smp howto that SMP with acpi is unstable, is this still the case?
<4> LaptopBrain: not usually.
<0> mmiikkee12: not really effective either, you'd just destroy two computers at the same time lol
<1> it's not a virus without "y0\_/ |-|4\/3 b33|\| pwn3d".
<6> my new smp board and processors arrive next week and im rebuilding my kernel now to tune it for that board, i wont reboot until i come to replace the parts
<0> hehe
<6> also, i cant find a kernel option specifically for nocona core, only xeon
<6> is there any way to tune it more specifically under menuconfig, and is it worth it?
<7> hi .. i m trying to compile and getting this error: gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1plus': execvp: No such file or directory .. could someone help me resolve this issue?
<4> Egyptian[Home]: you don't have gcc install right
<1> lietu: then someone runs a program on that other computer, which in turn maps another drive letter and overwrites some more files and spews forth another "y0\_/ |-|4\/3 b33|\| pwn3d" message.
<7> Skunky: fc5 with cc (GCC) 4.1.0 20060304 (Red Hat 4.1.0-3) .. whats missing?
<7> s/cc/gcc
<0> mmiikkee12: ***uming overwriting the .exes in the network share didn't already kill the computer ;)
<1> lietu, what kind of an idiot shares their entire C:?
<4> Egyptian[Home]: cc1plus is missing.
<7> gcc-c++ ?
<7> mmiikkee12: a windoze user ..
<1> Egyptian[Home], don't talk about my mom like that. :P
<0> mmiikkee12: many non-suspecting windows users?
<3> Egyptian[Home], you might need to map the environment variables, or setup you paths right. CC = gcc / CXX = g++
<7> Shadow_7: ok ..thx
<3> or ln -s /usr/bin/gcc-4.1 /usr/bin/gcc (and such)
<3> or install the version that came with your distro so it handles all of that for you.
<8> hey all
<8> i'm trying to install Fedora Core but when i boot and press enter, it runs few lines and then stops at : kernel_thread_helper + 0x5/0x14 ... anyone know the problem?
<4> MBzle: #fedora
<8> Skunky, they don't know
<9> Hello all! I'm having some trouble here.. I'm trying to Ubuntu. I have two Ethernet Cards (Encore ENL832-TX-RENT) that uses Realtek 8139 chips. But, Ubuntu don't find these cards. And when i run lspci all i get is: Ethernet controller: Unknown device xxxx:8139 (rev 10).. CVan anyone help me with this problem?
<9> i already tried google
<6> hmm
<6> thats an odd 'bug'
<6> the blank screen screensaver thats part of the kernel doesnt blank screen elements that have the 'bold' attribute on
<6> never noticed that
<10> Hello folks
<6> lo
<3> arthurgeek, modprobe 8139too ? ifconfig ..... eth0 up?
<4> arthurgeek: can't you just modprobe the driver? 8139too ?
<10> Where does exim usually keep the mail in its queue?
<9> Shadow_7: i tried that too... with no sucess
<3> are you sure it uses the 8139too driver?
<9> Shadow_7: yep
<9> Realtek 8139D chip
<3> arthurgeek, did you also setup the routes?
<3> you might also try the mii-tools stuff. mii-diag eth0 .....
<9> Shadow_7: The strange thing here is: Even with proper module not loaded, lspci ALWAYS get me Ethernet info. ALWAYS. But not this time
<3> that is odd, are the card plugged in properly?
<3> i.e. you haven't dropped the box, or shipped it UPS?
<4> arthurgeek: that's just because the pciutils didn't find it in it's lookup table, that hsoudn't sotp it from working.
<9> Shadow_7: if i plug an Via-Rhine, and run dmes it not findf my card, but with lspci it recognizes it. And then, with module loaded dmesg shows ok too
<9> Yep... that card works on windows
<4> arthurgeek: does modprobing the driver give an error in dmesg, or does it just not actually bind to anything? have you tried the other 8139 driver?
<3> lspci just looks at the hardware vender:device id stuff.
<9> Another strange thing: In WinXP normal Realtek 8139 are always recognized fine.. this card i needed CD-Driver...
<9> Shadow_7: hmm...
<3> the via-rhine isn't 8139too iirc.
<9> Shadow_7: i know that! was just an example
<3> I'm a bit far from the one comp that I have that actually has the via-rhine though.
<3> is 8139too in your /etc/modules file?
<3> so it loads at boot?
<9> One thing that i noticed too: This PCI card is a little smaller than slot. In windows it works, so, it's not card os mobo problem. Maybe these little "space" is the identifier?
<3> you might also need the alias 8139too eth0 stuff in /etc/modules.conf (or modprobe.conf)
<9> Shadow_7: I'm trying to install it. So, i actually don't have an working (without net) system. I run lspci from install cd
<3> it's not unusual for pci card to be smaller than their slots. especially if their functionality is mostly software run.
<3> google on the vender:device, that's what gets me the best results.
<9> http://www.encore-usa.com/product.php?id=79
<3> also cross-reference pciids.sf.net
<9> http://www.alibaba.com/sitemap/archives/images/qu50054871bo_LAN_Card_RTL_8139D.jpg http://www.arkaad.com/MercadoLibre/8139d-1.jpg take a look these two cards.. the first one is a little smaller..
<9> Skunky: loading the driver, dmesg gives me the same thing as withoud module loaded..
<11> arthurgeek, i have a 8139d and it works fine
<11> has done for 4 years
<3> I think the prob might be two cards of like driver.
<4> Shadow_7: that's why i suggested using the other driver.
<3> I've never dealt with that myself. My most of my hardware is a mesh of hand me downs.
<9> Shadow_7: hmm.. i don't tried removing one card... I'll try that!
<9> lspci -vv gives me irq numbers, right?
<3> dmesg should
<4> or /proc/interrupts
<3> or /var/log/kern.log
<9> fine.. i'll try removing one card and then booting the system...
<3> where does xchat 2.6.1 keep it's browser option?
<3> it's apparently trying to use a browser I don't have installed.
<4> i've never managed to get xchat to cope with any browser except what i get when I right click on a url.
<4> which is tedious, but works.
<12> I think it's in .xchat2
<3> The upgrade from 2.4 to 2.6 seems to have changed the right click to a simple "open with browser" without letting you select which.
<13> Shadow_7, yep. i noticed that also.
<12> I haven't used xchat in a long time though.
<12> So that's probably changed what I used to do.
<13> I think theres just some config files ya could use the old xchat configs and get them back.
<12> There was a file that had the command in it.
<4> stupid brokenness.
<12> I'd just change it.
<14> Where do I set my return-path address? I'm using mutt, but set form= and set use_form don't help.
<13> xchat is slowly losseing more and more features it seems. :P
<15> This may slightly sound off-topic but I was looking for a low capacity mp3 player which I could use as a file transfer device on my nix box..
<16> Dr_Willis: irssi!
<16> :)
<13> redduck666, gnome-xchat! (ICK!)
<15> About 200-300 MB of data max.
<13> wine mirc.exe
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
#fedora
/etc/fstab global-write
mrtg cs1.6
pygtk installed but not visible from python
#lgp
#perl
invalid: BASIC 010908312D230C5F
libgtkgl fedora
sqllite user_tables
#debian
|
|
