@# Quotes DB     useful, funny, interesting





Google
 
Web www.quotesdb.info
Undernet  |  EFnet  |  Quakenet  |  Freenode  |  Dalnet  |  Ircnet  |  Galaxynet
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31



Comments:

<0> So anything Posix?
<1> thats in my httpd.conf as per http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.0/svn-book.html#svn-ch-6-sect-4
<2> linux_user400354: that _seems_ to indicate a missing check, potentially not a major error, I'd tried 'make test', and if I didn't run across any errors there _I'd_ probably install it
<3> rob: you see that it is misspelled, right?
<1> ah...
<1> penny drops
<3> ;)
<1> yay it works now :)
<1> nice pickup infi
<3> cheers. don't forget to turn off verbose logging again, before you DoS yourself ;)
<1> hehe doing that now :)
<4> okay i have Tor working with firefox but i can't get xchat to connect using localhost and port 8118 with http proxy. Anyone have advice?
<0> Holy crap, the minix kernel is under 4000 lines of code...
<0> A10n: try #tor
<4> good advice lol! i didnt know it existed
<5> I have suse 10.0 and KDE 3.5.1 and I have put an icon on my desktop for my CD-DVD ROM... when I try to unmount it, I get an error that says "/media/cdrecorder"



<5> and I always have the Mounted Icon in place, whether I have a disc in or not
<3> Gigahurtz: that's why Andrew was complaining to Linus in that famous email
<3> thread
<0> infi: But how is the hardware support in Minix?
<3> "Mie karnal is teh smallz0r!"
<0> It must be VERY minimal
<3> no idea, never tried it.
<0> I want to try it, just cause I read somewhere Linus used it before Linux
<3> you should use xenix instead ;)
<0> It's comes with a GUI now
<3> I still haven't gotten around to trying plan9 either
<0> xenix? is that Xena The Warrior Princess Linux? :-P
<3> no, it's Microsoft UNIX
<3> heh
<0> haha
<0> Pfft
<0> So Microsofts interest in
<0> OS/2 killed Xenix
<0> thats dumb
<2> which is why the purchase a lic from SC0 :P
<2> they
<2> M$
<2> cough
<6> no, they sold it to sco
<6> the old, good sco (not the piece of **** who calls itself sco now)
<0> huh? MS never held the license to UNIX
<7> yes the sco that was interested in linux
<6> they did hold a unix license (see the copyright messages on xenix)
<7> GiGaHuRtZ, look again
<6> the sco back then changed their name to tarantella, and recently got bought out by sun
<3> iirc, I think their deal with DEC regarding NT on Alpha was that they had to get out of the unix field for good.
<6> the sco you see now used to be called caldera
<8> gah, this is really eating my cpu
<6> this all predates nt
<6> the microsoft unix stuff was like mid 80's
<6> they had no interest in it, so they sold their interest off
<3> I mean with Xenix, they had to permanently agree with DEC that they would never ever develop a unix-like OS again, no?
<0> From wiki: Xenix was Microsoft's version of Unix intended for use on microprocessors, but they called it Xenix because it could not license the "UNIX" name.
<3> ah, ok.
<3> there was some bizarre deal they had to make with DEC
<6> 386 with 12mb ram
<1> man tetex is one big package.. almost 50mb
<6> you had to pay extra for everythign
<6> x11, tcp/ip, streams were all $$$
<3> sounds like HP-UX
<3> they won't even give you an ANSI C compiler :b
<2> SC0 _claims_ to own UNIX, and M$ uses that claim as an excuse to funnel $25m in lic fees to them to continue their case
<0> Acording to the wiki, AT&T still owned Unix during Xenix's development
<6> didnt get that on xenix either
<2> groklaw.net
<7> GiGaHuRtZ, so?
<3> Darrel is teh evil.
<7> they licenced it many times
<6> keep in mind that the SCO making these claims is not the SCO who sold Xenix
<3> yeah
<0> Basically, M$ sold Xenix to sco?
<6> yes
<6> during the 80's
<0> But Xenix wasn't really Unix?
<0> According to the wikipedia....



<9> how to upgrade GNU readline ?
<6> it was based on system iii
<0> God damn, this is confusing
<6> iirc
<2> [_eNcHeLLe_]: which distro
<3> itrebal: use ps-doom to kill processes For Great Justice
<0> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenix
<10> [_eNcHeLLe_]: use your package manager
<8> infi: lol
<8> infi: this is the second time i've ripped it, the first time i ripped it i closed out and didn't transcode it, and wouldn't let me when i reopened it
<11> Cquence: no probs
<0> infi: heh, this is from the Plan9 site regarding additional software
<0> X11
<0> You really dont want to use this. Its old and slow and only works well on 8-bit displays.
<8> haha
<0> Talk about a old piece of software...
<0> Python 2.2
<0> haha
<0> How can they have python 2.2 and some old *** X11
<1> lots of people still use python 2.2
<0> Cause python 2.2 isn't that old is it?
<0> rob: ya i know
<0> it's just weird, a newer version of python with a wicked old version of X11
<12> there is a utiltiy called alien to convert rpm packages into deb packages. is there anything to convert deb packages into rpm packages?
<8> neila
<0> brb, smoke
<0> actually
<0> im tired
<0> gnight
<9> where i can fine GNU readline path ?
<9> where i can find GNU readline path ?
<2> linux_user400354: you may want to check rpmfind.net, and freshrpms.net
<9> anyone can answer my prob?
<9> where to find GNU readline ?
<3> package manager
<9> like ? /home/?/?/?/?
<3> Re: Windows 1.0: "Furthermore, legal challenges by Apple limited its functionality. For example, windows could only appear 'tiled' on the screen; that is, they could not overlap or overlie one another." tee hee.
<3> enchelle: What distribution are you using?
<9> i think debian
<9> i have openkore
<9> it says i need to install higher GNU readline 4.3 is required
<3> then you need to use the dpkg package manager
<3> there should be like a Debian User's Tutorial or something on debian.org
<3> no idea.
<9> but i dont know how to install sh: dpkg: command not found
<13> what could cause some startup programs to make socket connections and connect properly
<9> sh: dpkg: command not found
<13> but other clients to not make any socket connections?
<9> dpkg <-- command not found
<3> http://www.togaware.com/linux/survivor/Wajig_Packages.shtml
<3> and http://www.togaware.com/linux/survivor/
<14> checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/ginstall -c
<14> checking whether build environment is sane... configure: error: newly created file is older than distributed files!
<14> Check your system clock
<14> when i type ./configure
<14> anyone how i can fix that?
<10> yikd: check your system clock
<14> yeah what about it?
<10> yikd: what does date -u say?
<14> it works
<14> cheers
<10> says Sat Apr 15 05:41:09 UTC 2006, and yours should say about the same
<10> otherwise your clock is off
<14> all g00d
<15> how can i specify a path to static library to gcc? this doesn't work: g++ -m32 -l/usr/lib/libruby.so.1.8 ...
<15> i meant g++
<3> -L
<3> for library path, then -lruby
<3> probably just -lruby will work there, as /usr/lib is included by default.
<15> infi: problem is, i have two versions of lruby: 32bit in /usr/lib and 64bit in /usr/lib64 .. g++ is always using the 64-bit one
<15> even though i specify -m32
<3> then -L/usr/lib -lruby. I think the -L prepends to the system library path. otherwise, perhaps export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib


Name:

Comments:

Please enter the result of the sum 63 + 46 (to avoid spam):






Return to #linux
or
Go to some related logs:

efm file manager source code
Apachez birthday
#linux
#php
boggiex64
imwheel 11 buttons
wget unrecognised option http-password
Lunarctic
etch Setting locale failed
macosx pyreadline



Home  |  disclaimer  |  contact  |  submit quotes