@# Quotes DB     useful, funny, interesting





Google
 
Web www.quotesdb.info
Undernet  |  EFnet  |  Quakenet  |  Freenode  |  Dalnet  |  Ircnet  |  Galaxynet
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58



Comments:

<0> thanks
<0> it just makes sense to me that sync() would be called
<0> sync write data and meta data
<0> or should
<1> Quiznos, the problem with sync() is that it may also flush other FDs, right?
<0> i dont sync before a umount except to flops
<1> it is the global "flush-all" trigger
<0> yea, sync is "global"
<1> Quiznos, it may be a problem with additional NFS mounts and such
<0> hmm
<0> perhaps
<1> Quiznos, the kernel sync magic is in fs/buffer.c if you're interested
<0> i'm on 2.4x
<1> ok
<0> but nah :)
<1> but it is in fs/ as well



<0> yea
<1> see you, and thanks for your help
<2> how do i set different dns servers for differnet application, i want firefox to use ns1.externalserver.com and mozilla to use ns1.internalserver.com as nameservers for domain resolution
<0> duno
<2> even i dont think there could be anyway to do so..........
<2> last 3 days i am really comming up with wired problems...like p***ing selective connections via socks and others normaly.....then making yum go over socks...
<0> why do you want to do that?
<2> looks like need to format my brain and update with latest version of LInux
<0> re the dns?
<3> BBL,gonna install Arch on the server
<2> i have a dns server for local machines that resolves only for local machines....on the other hand i can connect to internet using socks...but due to unavailablity of dns resolution it dies off...
<0> geek busted for robbery, showering, eating breakfast and using internet; he forgot to log off!
<2> so if nameserver 1 is local, nameserver 2 is external nameserver 3 is external....the request first gets loged at nameserver1 which is internal name server
<2> and we dont want this requests to be loged at nameserver....
<2> i was speaking from resolve.conf point of view
<0> why?
<0> k
<4> the wrong spelling of the name is actually the right spelling... it's resolv.conf
<2> and if i keep nameserver 2 as nameserver 1 then my external request are succesfully resolved but at times internal ones fail
<2> jimL ya
<2> i need a system using which i can define internet access mechanism to an application...like resouce allocation for applications....
<4> why not have the internal ones as nonforwarding caching-only with possible authority on internal/non-routable domains?
<2> i think this idea needs to be logged....what da ya say
<0> bug that's interesting, do it
<2> cannot do anything with internal nameservers no access...and cant demand changes...
<0> bug which dns tool do you use?
<4> is it more than just a dhcp server?
<0> resolv i mean
<2> Quiznos, welcome to "yes you can do it -- YYCDI Group" ...
<0> bug, actually it's the "somone oughta..." group
<4> so port 53 is blocked?
<4> or what?
<2> we have local bind running ...for internal resolutions
<0> ew
<4> bind -is- the standard...
<2> you can find wired internal domain names like mikeonbike.com ---- which resolves to some local ip
<2> or nohotmail.com etc...this are wired and funny ones...
<2> thats all fun inside...but nothing can be done in outside world...
<4> ok... I'll have to say I'm not following at all
<2> ok i will explian once again
<4> you have to have dns auth on the outside
<4> wait, let me try scrolling back
<2> situation: Local nameserver can be used to resolve local domain names. No external domain name can be resolved. I need firefox to use socks proxy and external nameserver and mozilla to use local intranet and internal nameserver
<4> oh, different dns for different apps
<2> hmmm...thats the catch
<4> if you look at the source of the program dig or nslookup
<4> you'll find that both of these programs can accept a dns server
<4> maybe you could use the same code to create a wrapper
<5> a manpage is enough to see that
<4> Ticho: the man page does not show the code
<6> as dig and nslookup are part of the BIND distribution, i guess they do the lookup themselves. they don't tell the OS "use this nameserver for gethostbyname()" or so.
<0> TheBonsai !!! how ya been?
<7> hi i have a general question
<2> :) hiya TheBonsai
<4> PrivateSniper: there are no generals here!
<6> y0 Quiznos. was sleepin' heh. now i'm ready to rumble ;)
<7> does anyone know any web programs for linux similar to dreamweaver?
<0> coolies
<6> jim: "Who the **** is General Failure??? And why is he reading my hard disk?!??!"
<0> lol



<7> anyone?
<0> did ou google?
<0> you
<2> PrivateSniper, #web
<7> thx
<4> I never seen dreamweaver so I have no idea what it does
<4> but I do web programming
<2> PrivateSniper, #html #php
<4> my boss will often say your nick... dojob! now!
<6> heh
<8> Dreamwaver - under Linux I use "NVU", but "Quanta Plus" works good too
<4> I use a server architecture that includes a rdbms, either pg or oracle, and a web application server... and openacs on top of those :)
<2> on an overall i think there should be a tool which can manage resource allocation to an applications, like which proxy to use, which nameserver to use, how much memory it can use etc
<6> #3 is covered
<6> talking to a proxy is NOT "using a system ressource"
<6> talking to a proxy is done on a much higher level
<6> apropos proxy, many applications respect enviroment variables. but don't ask me for firefox.
<2> i said resources, it can be system resources or others
<2> problem is when an applicaition is build using many preexisting sub applicaiton, you can set environment variable for one which might not at all applicable to the inner programs
<2> examples running yumex under tsocks sets socket server values for yumex but this values are not set for yum which is internally called by yumex
<6> {Bug}: you can force an application to use a proxy (as in "transparent proxy") - but as long as the application has an own proxy entry, the OS can't influence it (the protocol to talk to the proxy is done inside the app)
<3> Quiznos, what times the date?
<2> TheBonsai, any idea how can i make yumex use socks as proxy...
<6> {Bug}: force it. with iptables redirection.
<9> anyone know any games that take advantage of 4 monitors?
<6> {Bug}: transparent for the app.
<6> tonisius: efficient coding.
<6> tonisius: ;)
<3> tonisius, for linux? nope...
<9> how about for windows?
<3> maybe...
<3> not sure though
<2> TheBonsai, hmmm can you give example like i want yum/ yumex to use socks at port 9090
<9> i want to try out my sli cards in non sli mode
<3> wait...
<3> i know
<2> how do i configure iptables for that
<9> i so far have windows on 4 lcd screens, but can't span more than 2 monitors at a time
<3> MS Flight Sim 2004 would do 4 monitors i would think
<6> {Bug}: no idea if it's possible "by process" nowadays. i don't know how iptables grew. ask #iptables maybe.
<9> without the need of spanning?
<3> i donno
<9> hmm, any other games, while i look for this one?
<3> nope... not of the top of my head
<3> whatcha got for sli?
<9> dual 6800 GT 256mb video cards
<9> 8x each channel
<3> eh not bad
<9> it's not the best, but damn well feels like it
<3> they make a new board, that does 16x each channel
<9> i played on dual mnonitors, but wanted to try 3 monitors
<3> asus only so far though...
<10> hi
<9> GiGaHuRtZ: yeah, i read on those, but dont want to get them yet, can't afford the stuff
<9> i got what i could afford for the time
<3> oh
<4> well the best is the 20+ story towers that you ride in while doing your flight simu
<9> and made a mistake hoping i could span across all 4 monitors using SLI
<3> im looking at an dual dualcore opteron setup on socket 940 with sli
<10> Finally can talk, forgot my last nickserv p***, oops
<3> probably just 660GT's though, im not a big gamer...
<9> Improved support for 3D graphics hardware acceleration in multiple windows and across multiple monitors
<3> tonisius, what game?
<9> the flight sim
<9> =P
<9> and i like how i can keep track of 4 monitors
<9> 2 of them with google
<9> one with SSH full screened to my shell
<11> tonisius you cradle robber you!


Name:

Comments:

Please enter the result of the sum 63 + 46 (to avoid spam):






Return to #linux
or
Go to some related logs:

rhel yum cvsd
midnight comand +ubuntu
Azeraus pl
#python
#kde
suse dvb-utils repository
kartouche fopen
#asm
#math
limewire bad source



Home  |  disclaimer  |  contact  |  submit quotes