| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
Comments:
<0> hehe
<0> does it blow you? if so i'll get one...
<1> Well it did once but I had issues getting myself out of the cd tray
<2> hi all
<1> I'd rather not talk about to be honest. It brings back feelings of embar***ments and shame.
<1> -s
<0> haha
<3> hahaha
<0> is that what a Jabberwock is? :P
<1> Sarah: Who's your jabber?
<1> http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&ct=res&cd=1&url=http%3A//support.avaya.com/elmodocs2/cajun/archive/p118ig.pdf&ei=FgHqQ8H5KMHyaLSUlZ8M&sig2=phLbm57ntwG3MgZ-ECb9Sw
<0> Does lucent even make networking components anymore?
<1> GiGaHuRtZ: http://www.jabberwocky.com/carroll/jabber/jabberwocky.html
<3> Oh baby, you are, thanks! =D
<1> lol np
<0> I remember they were rivals to cisco at one time....
<2> anyone here got any positive experiences with succesfully mounting a fourth generation via usb on a system running a 2.6 kernel?
<2> anyone here got any positive experiences with succesfully mounting a fourth generation ipod via usb on a system running a 2.6 kernel?
<2> sorry
<1> The only lucent product I've ever had experience with was a PCI win modem
<0> same here...
<1> That took my a year to get working in Linux because that's how long it was before lucent released a driver
<0> yup
<1> s/my/me
<0> damn win modems in linux
<1> yeah. glad modems are obsolete now
<1> Well I shouldn't say that. They're always nice for emergencies when you have no ethernet connection or wireless
<4> ! this is the xth time ntpd decides to **** a config out of it's thumb and overwrite my superb config
<1> jim: don't worry about it.
<0> ya im loving life on my 10mb down 1mb up pipe :)
<1> slpyhd: debian?
<5> I'm not buying nothing before I know what's up :P
<4> no homebrew
<1> Oh. never heard of it.
<6> jim : we use a lot of lacie ones. no issues with them so far
<1> I use pool.ntp.org in my config
<5> which kernel do you use? what chipset do the lacie enclosures use? what'
<5> s the max drive size?
<5> did you ever have to upgrade kernel or build extra drivers to support the device?
<4> it's abstract
<6> jim : we use mostly 2.6.x kernels, 160-200GB drives, god knows what chipset lacie stuff has
<6> jim : and no
<5> what was the max drive size handled by the enclosure? or did you buy enclosures and drives separately? or?
<6> jim : we bought the enclosures with the drives in them already
<1> ananke: Do you have any clue where ntp.conf should be in FreeBSD?
<1> The package doesn't install it, nor man pages
<6> Jabberwock : no clue, it's been ages since i've touched freebsd
<1> I guess I could just ask in #freebsd but figured I'd try you first
<1> ah okay
<5> Jabberwock: probably you could just tell it where the config is on the ntpd command line
<1> yeah. Just wondering if I should be using a default
<5> not /etc/ntpd.conf? or /etc/ntp/ntpd.conf or similar?
<1> Usually stuff in fbsd goes in /usr/local/etc/
<1> but it's not in any of those places
<1> Ah well. I'll ask in the proper channel. thanks
<5> does the daemon start?
<1> yep
<5> so it sounds like you have a config file already :)
<5> you think so too?
<1> No. I think ntpd will run on its built in defaults
<7> hi guys
<1> Hail King Milo
<7> ive setup acl, kernel, in fstab, rebuilt packages with acl. I used, setfacl -m u:nobody:rwx /mnt/share and checked that it was set with: getacl /mnt/share . all looked in order. The problem I am having is that when a user creates a new file in /mnt/share it is ***igning the file his/her permissions instead of nobody:users . Any ideas on how to set it correctly? ;)
<7> lol
<1> acl.. Posix acl?
<1> grsec?
<7> yes
<7> posix
<1> Never used it. sorry
<7> no prob ;)
<5> maybe you setgid the dir you want them to put stuff in
<7> all i need is when a NEW file is created in /mnt/share it must ***ign it perm, nobody:users ;)
<5> maybe you setgid the dir you want them to put stuff in
<5> but I can't be sure. you could try that
<0> i wouldnt see why that wouldnt work...
<5> just because you have acls set up doesn't mean that affects the ownership of new files
<5> or you could check the kernel source or docs to see what happens when any new file is created
<6> you cannot do it with acls. and the closest thing you can do is setgid bit on a directory, to force group ownership
<0> Anyone what happened to Yoper?
<0> Did it just die?....
<4> didnt the owner die?
<4> maintainer
<1> the schwartz required a human sacrifice.
<4> or what distro was that
<4> like few months ago
<0> didnt hear of a maintainer that died...
<7> ok ill try
<0> atlhough the slackware guy was really sick...
<6> who cares about yoper. its developers were total ***holes
<0> i thought yoper was pretty decent
<0> imo
<1> I miss `teh lunix`
<1> simoriah never finished it though
<0> wanna see ***holes? talk to the LFS developers...
<0> Total pricks...
<1> worse than the guys in #php?
<4> mdadm --stop functionality seems to work in strange ways
<0> never been there...
<1> You're blessed
<0> although #debian is pretty bad
<6> slpyhd : how so?
<4> ananke: it doesnt seem to stop md's
<6> slpyhd : mdadm --stop --scan
<5> look at how the #php people must get hit on all the time by n00bs who won't read up and all that stuff
<6> or mdadm /dev/mdwhatever --stop
<4> or, it autostarts them on mount request
<1> jim: yeah but they do stuff like kick-ban you if they feel you're hitting enter
<4> either one
<1> too many times
<6> slpyhd : mdadm doesn't do that. something else does
<6> mdadm could care less about /etc/fstab
<1> StormChaser specifically just sits there 24/7 and doesn't say a word
<5> Jabberwock: how many people are in the channel?
<1> unless he/she/it feels the need to op itself and kick someone for doing something like.. typing
<1> jim: dunno
<1> I'm not there
<0> does anyone know anything about xorg 7.0 and 32bit support?
<4> ananke: yes I'm aware of that
<7> so i would use: setgid users /mnt/share
<4> but I thought first encounters are different from manual mounts
<6> slpyhd : if you were aware of that, then you wouldn't say that
<1> jim: They have this list of channel policies that include stuff that cause me to believe they are truly mental people with nothing to do
<5> if it's > 200 and they've had a problem with that... I'm just saying I can understand how they got that way
<1> "If you don't put all your statements in 1 line we will kick you. Don't abuse enter"
<5> why else would they be helping people with -php-?!
<5> plus, mob mentality would apply
<0> on my xorg7.0 box the xorgconfigure makes makes a xorg.conf that has a 32bit depth
<0> are they planing on finally doing 32bit colors?
<0> because, atm it doesn't work...
<8> 32-bit color is just 24-bit color with an alpha channel.
<0> i understand that
<0> but why did they put that there
<8> it's probably an intended feature that they haven't actually finished yet
<0> its not in earlier version...
<5> maybe it's coming soon :P
<0> i hate xorg....
<9> so don't use it
<0> i dont, well not on my LFS box at least...
<8> X is a mess. it should be replaced.
<0> i prefer xfree
<4> ah got it, raiddevice is after --stop
<4> I have it as first argument everywhere
<0> anyone ever try opensolaris?
<8> urgh
<5> it still is first argument... but after switches
<0> im just curious about something with solaris
<8> Sun should stick to making hardware and just use linux or something, because, I mean, really
<0> not sure if it applies to only opensolaris
<8> well what's your question
<5> sun's hardware is overpriced
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
#fluxbox
perl m/\s(\S*)/;
#php
kpaint ubuntu
#web
xmms asf FC5
#perl
#centos
Failed to write hash table ubuntu
suphp Mismatch between target UID (500) and UID
|
|