| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45
Comments:
<0> spenser, hey...just like nero did...good idea
<1> ;)
<2> Or contract with a crematorium and a thermodecomposition company.
<0> thermodepolymerisiation is a good technology
<2> headmonkey: quite a lot.
<2> It depends how fast you tip them into the input mincer.
<2> On the plus side - higher motivation.
<0> does anyone know if a directory entry can be a symbolic link and a directory ??
<3> animals that wouldn't 'answer back'
<4> Iron_Chef: Don't you dare approach it with logic, y'hear ;P
<0> i dont think it can
<3> DerJamster: it's weird heh
<2> IronI think the point was to extract the mental energy somehow.
<4> Iron_Chef: http://www.machall.com/index.php?strip_id=194
<3> headmonkey: it can be too one, and act like one, but in the ind it's a different kind of file
<0> Iron_Chef, as reported by stat() ... a symlink will be a symlink to a directory, but not a directory, correct ?
<2> yes
<2> you tell which by the name IIRC
<3> headmonkey: i think so, it will behave like a directory in that case, but - diff kind o file
<0> the name ?
<0> nevermind ... i figure it out when my file manager does something wierd
<3> DerJamster: yeah, what was the logical point of their (esp smith's) pathological hatred of humans? waste of energy exactly ;-)
<5> I wonder if my Ozzy Osbourne CD is DRMed...
<5> Naw... I ripped that **** decades ago...
<4> Iron_Chef: check the previous strip, too ;)
<6> hi
<2> I meant that a symbolic link that's a link to a dir will usually have / at the end of the 'to' name
<2> Not always however
<2> you've basically gotta check the underlying file
<2> As ln -s /tmp tmp is as valid as ln -s /tmp/ tmp
<0> SpeedEvil, yeah...i will ... i have an if() that exits if its not a directory atm ... will add the symlink thing later
<6> is there something I can do about a machine (x86_64) crashing somewhere in a netfilter-module? unfortunately that machine is remote, without a serial-console available
<6> is it possible to redirect the kernel-oops by network or so?
<5> The neat thing about getting something on /. is that you get famous really fast.
<2> stefan2: Look in the 'kenrole hacking' options
<5> Now just google peterfa...
<0> i have to fix the cwd logic, as it doesnt change to the directory when you double click on it...it just figures out the new path and reads it
<2> 'kernel hacking'
<2> stefan2: there are a few ways to get it to dump oopses in various places
<2> stefan2: there are also third party patches
<6> speedevil: unfortunately I can't recompile the kernel
<7> SpeedEvil: how do i block my ip to being seen by /dns wwallace
<2> wwallace_lap: You need a cloak
<7> how do i get it?
<5> !google peterfa
<2> wwallace_lap: Basically, you have to convince a staffer to give you one.
<5> rats
<7> oh
<2> headmonkey: by the time it kernel panics, gtk isn't awake
<0> SpeedEvil, what ?
<0> SpeedEvil, i dont get kernel panics ;)
<0> SpeedEvil, i just want a screen snapshot ;)
<2> headmonkey: Oh - I thought you were talking of the earlier comment - guy with no serial port and oopses on a remote box
<2> headmonkey: xv
<0> SpeedEvil, nah...i dont care about him ;)
<2> xgrab?
<6> speedevil: if at least I could find the exact module in which it fails. I think there are about 3-4 netfilter-modules involved
<0> no xgrab apparently either...at least no manpage for it
<3> DerJamster: cool site thanks for that link :-)
<2> err - not xgram
<2> b
<4> Iron_Chef: no prob :>
<5> Time flies like an arrow... fruit flies like a banana.
<2> stefan2: Are you sure you can't recompile?
<2> stefan2: is it just annoying, or impossible.
<6> speedevil: sure
<2> Sigh
<0> no matches found...bummer
<2> xgrab was the wrong name
<3> see yas! /me goes to buy big-iron :-)
<2> I can't remember the right one
<6> speedevil: funny thing is that it works fine on an otherwise identical i386 - but crashes my x86_64 after a few library-calls
<2> stefan2: Check the current config for any oops/panic dumping crashes
<2> Is the second one the box in question?
<2> where you can't get to it?
<0> there you go...a 64 bit software crash
<0> SpeedEvil, xwd ?
<2> that may be it
<6> speedevil: nothing shown on grep -i "panic" or "oops" on the config
<2> yeah
<2> :/
<0> yup...its on my box, has a manpage, and says it does it
<6> only # CONFIG_IPMI_PANIC_EVENT is not set
<6> but I guess that's something else if I remember IPMI correctly :-)
<2> It crashes immediately?
<2> Can you reset?
<6> speedevil: not immediately, but reproducable
<6> speedevil: i use the ipset-userspace-tool to trigger the error
<6> speedevil: after adding about 300-350 entries into an ipset-hash it hangs
<6> speedevil: I can at least hard-reboot that machine remotely
<2> Ok, can you reset it? If so - have you tried loading modules one by one?
<2> Also maybe search the kernel mailing list for bugs
<6> speedevil: it's not a sleeping module that crashes it
<2> is it a recent kernel?
<2> See if you can provoke it with only one or two loaded?
<6> speedevil: I think it has got to do with those netfilter-modules I compiled against the kernel-devel-package of the running kernel
<8> How do I compile a kernel module that has the right version magic for my UML kernel? Even though I'm pointing make to the UML kernel source tree, when I try to insmod the module inside my UML kernel it complains it has the version magic of my host machine (I'm compiling in the host environment -- the UML kernel environment doesn't have gcc)
<2> The modules weren't built at the same time as the kernel?
<6> speedevil: it's a redhat-enterprise-one (2.6.9 with lots of fixes) - but otherwise up-to-date
<6> speedevil: no
<2> Tehre are all sorts of possible problems then
<2> Can you get redhat pre-built modules?
<6> speedevil: well, I didn't build them somewhere else on a kernel-compile and copy them over. I did compile them against the kernel-devel-package offered by redhat for that kernel
<6> unfortunately those two netfilter-modules I need aren't available for that redhat-kernel
<2> I don't know enough about it to comment - as I always do it manually
<9> Does anyone know where the GNU-RADIO channel is?
<2> I would first search the linux kernel mailing list for reported bugs
<6> speedevil: the ipset-functionality is quite new anyway
<6> speedevil: I did search for related bugs together with the term netfilter or ipset for quite a while now - without success
<2> Yeah - but 2.6.9 is quite old .
<2> :(
<2> You might try mailing the listed maintainer.
<10> hello, i am trying to setup my dns server and i think i've done everything correctly but i can't figure out why its not working
<2> JakeConnor: what happens?
<6> speedevil: not sure if I'm on the right way - but on identical system with i386-arch it works fine repeatable
<2> Does it explode?
<2> stefan2: Yeah - that's just annoying.
<10> SpeedEvil: pretty much yes
<2> JakeConnor: Call the bomb squad.
<10> SpeedEvil: i get this error when trying to find the A record... Searching for iphlexx.com A record at ns1.iphlexx.com. [64.69.42.224]: Server failure! [took 88 ms].
<2> Anything in logs?
<2> I haven't actually done bind/dns, so can't really help much "(
<5> The funny thing about DRM is that it's been around since a short while after computers where m***ed produced.
<5> The first virus was created for the purpose of DRM.
<5> A company got sick of people copying their software, so they made a virus to see how far the copies got.
<11> PeterFA: who was that?
<5> Microsoft Windows XP has has DRM too.
<5> basbryan, I forget, but the interesting thing about this is that this was for Apple machines.
<5> Microsoft Windows XP Product Activation is DRM... it's not really that invasive or controlling. It does make it harder to pirate their software.
<6> speedevil: I will see to track this down somehow. meanwhile, thank you very much
<11> didn't xp eula talk about tem being able to monitor your activities?
<5> We all should take a lesson from Microsoft though, the Product Activation is just a subtle hint that you really shouldn't be using their product... as in, "Are you really sure about this?"
<5> basbryan, I don't know.
<5> basbryan, maybe it's in there somewhere.
<5> Microsoft wants to make it harder for you to use Windows just like the warning labels on cigarettes and bottles of liquor.
<5> "Warning, this product will **** your *** up."
<11> lol
<5> Microsoft is not an evil company afterall.
<5> MSN Messenger is pretty much the MOST BLOATED PEICE OF ****ING SPYWARE I have ever seen.
<5> Spyware, and adware.
<5> i **** you not.
<11> worse than real media fiasco?
<11> the one from gibson research?
<5> basbryan, that simply didn't function... it did do pop ups and such. The deal with MSN Messenger is that every where you look there are ads and things requesting money.
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
madvise mman.h my_global.h
totem-thumbnailer
#centos
#css
lacie big disk gentoo
gentoo madwifi ioctl[ieee80211_ioctl_setmlme]
#perl
howto resend mailq sendmail
crontab seteuid: Operation not permitted
#web
|
|