@# Quotes DB     useful, funny, interesting





Google
 
Web www.quotesdb.info
Undernet  |  EFnet  |  Quakenet  |  Freenode  |  Dalnet  |  Ircnet  |  Galaxynet
Page: 1 2 3 4



Comments:

<0> errr?
<0> it's the same major and minor version
<1> because 2.6.16.1 configuration selection!=2.6.16.16 configuration selections
<0> gb: I did go through it for 2.6.16 and 2.6.16.17
<1> configs are not interchangeable between versions hence the need for make oldconfig
<1> sometimes you might jag a config which will appear too work for more then one kernel
<0> hmm....
<0> well I'll be back in 30 min I guess
<0> I'll do make oldconfig and redo the configuration from scratch
<0> after I reboot a few times with a stock kernel
<1> Shadowcat: try using a stock kernel for a while till you get the hang of compiling your own functional kernels
<0> umm I know how to compile my own functional kernels
<0> I've been compiling them fine since 2.6.8
<1> you should always keep one stable kernel as a baackup, stock or your own that is know too be functional
<0> ya the debian stock kernel is in there



<1> Shadowcat: if you did you'd not be here complaining about it now
<0> I'm not in here complaining about anything
<0> I'm trying to find out what's wrong
<0> sheesh
<0> I don't know where the bloody error is and that's why I'm asking
<0> now if you're not gonna do anything but chew me off for it then you might as well NOT help me
<1> I consider "ok, so crappy linux support" too be a complaint
<0> sigh I'll fix this on my own
<2> The expression is "chew me out," by the way.
<2> "Chew me off" sounds ... dirty.
<1> now now try #granma :P
<0> infi: yyssw
<2> No definitions found for "yyssw"
<2> don't know that one.
<2> oh, "yeah yeah sure sure whatever"
<1> doesn't matter, I'd not be suprised if it was simply a troll
<2> yeah, he seemed to have a pretty crappy attitude.
<1> anyone with a clue would have simply rolled back too their last stable kernel & started again :)
<2> That's too hard! Let's go shopping instead!
<1> especially if they have no idea what the cause of their problem is
<1> I dont want too ask do I ?
<2> oh, just a common attitude in the states ;)
<2> "Math is hard! Let's go SHOPPING!"
<1> state of inebriation or the united State of rectums?
<2> sort of like the canonical blonde answer.
<2> all of the above?
<1> infi: dont knock blondes, I might resemble one
<2> yar, I thought you might :)
<2> blonde hair is common down under from what I've seen
<3> uhhhh
<1> cohonen: nfs'd too microsoft box :)
<3> gb: yea
<1> nah thats no good
<1> you need too cat /boot/bzImage>/dev/dsp
<4> dd if=/boot/bzImage of=/dev/dsp
<4> "kernel music"
<1> no beeps as such
<1> gee takes a longtime too play out
<1> wonder how it'd go shoved through ogg123 or mpg123
<1> my guess is it'd need valid headers first
<1> ahh peace
<4> heh
<5> init 0
<3> gb: i know i do it all the time
<6> hi everyone
<3> yo yo
<7> yo2u
<3> ultra YO
<8> hi
<8> what algorithm uses the mm: LRU or NRU?
<9> how to run a cmd in a chroot without /bin and /lib etc
<9> from a shell basis
<1> umm relevance too #kernel?
<1> try #bash
<1> or whatever #shell you use
<10> Hi guys..
<10> Am not able to compile a simple hello world program given on ldd3!! I have a completely build source tree running
<10> But still it keeps popping up saying no rule to make and no target etc etc



<10> any sugestions?
<4> tuxmaniac: read about compiling and makefiles
<10> bobbens: in ldd3 itself?
<4> elsewhere
<4> i have an idea of what you're doing, and thats what you need
<10> bobbens: http://pastebin.com/731463
<8> what algorithm uses the mm: LRU or NRU?
<1> sys_elf: exactly
<4> tuxmaniac: see, you are missing a makefile
<4> man makefile
<4> mmm
<4> man make
<4> or your Makefile isnt properly done
<10> hmmm
<8> gb, exactly what?
<1> bad tar?
<8> LRU or NRU?
<1> sys_elf: exactly :)
<8> ...
<8> LRU != NRU
<1> I need more information before I can answer :)
<8> in order to replace the pages in physical memory
<1> well I can answer just as vaguely which is what I've done :)
<1> Personaly I don't eat m & m's :)
<11> i enabled CONFIG_HPET_TIMER and in dmesg i get "Using tsc for high-res timesource." does that mean i don't have HPET support?
<1> not necesarilly
<11> in static void __init hpet_time_init(void) in arch/i386/kernel/time.c i see if ((hpet_enable() >= 0) && hpet_use_timer) printk("Using HPET for base-timer\n");
<1> depends on what else is configured too
<11> and i dont get that message
<1> yes but theres more then one reason why hpet might not get used
<1> don't be ***uming anything now
<11> k (=
<1> des a search engine tell you any other ways too confirm you have a hpet?
<1> typically a hardware id in proc or dmesg
<1> I dont use hpet myself
<1> I use rtc
<11> gb what's the difference between them?
<12> i think everybody should waste 5 min of their life and read http://bash.org/?642195
<1> dunno never had a machine with hpet
<11> gb, i'm searching around and i cant really find anything
<1> marik_: what made you think you might have a hpet in the first place?
<11> gb, i just saw the option and wanted to find out if i did or not
<11> i dont really know what it is or what it's used for
<1> hehehehe ok
<11> high precision event timer? that what it stands for?
<1> marik_: some kernel options require more then being selected in the config too make them work
<11> i dont know what rtc is, and the difference between hpet and rtc, or what 8254 is (though iirc that's the clock your bios uses.. i remember having to buy a battery with that number i think)
<1> usually hardware also needs an irq & io setting as well, either compiled in, set on the command line or loaded with a module
<11> i'm using acpi pnp
<11> the closest thing i've found is this unanswered post to lkml.org: http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:jVUIqHldlv0J:lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/14/27+determine+if+HPET+support%3F&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=2
<11> gb: i installed lshw
<11> i went to Notebook > Motherboard > Bios and it doesnt have RTC, HPET, nor APIC listed there
<11> or 8254 timer
<11> for that matter
<11> nonothing there had any info on it
<11> i just googled my laptop type+hpet and got nothing, so i'm just going to ***ume i dont have hpet support
<11> google for my laptop and rtc gets quite a few hits
<11> so i guess i need to enable RTC
<13> intel?
<11> the cpu is an intel pentium-m dothan
<11> if that's what you're asking
<13> jop
<11> jop ?
<13> you can fore to load the HPET even if bios doesn't report it!
<11> ya, but it's a laptop: a compaq nx7010. i google'd nx7010 HPET, and got nothing, so odds are it's not supported in this one
<13> na, wopuldn't say this! it's juts nobody is currious about picking the hpet timer! but it should be on all intel chipsets (at least the newer ones)
<11> hm
<11> what's this Memory split (3G/1G user/kernel split) ?
<11> axp i'll come back to seeing if i have an HPET after i get a working kernel
<11> what would be the advantages of using "Use register arguments"
<14> where are the user-space tools for suspend3?
<14> or does suspend3 go under a different name?
<15> Llame question: how to obtain full kernel version? I mean I wanna know if I have 2.6.15-23.34 or 2.6.15-23.35 (Ubuntu)
<15> thx


Name:

Comments:

Please enter the result of the sum 63 + 46 (to avoid spam):






Return to #kernel
or
Go to some related logs:

PythonCOM sourcecode
procmail DSN service unavailable
pptp client sled 10.1
dpkg repair depencies
gmake in ubuntu
pivot_root: No such file or directory /sbin/init: 432
#centos
#math
ubuntu frostwire hangs
#web



Home  |  disclaimer  |  contact  |  submit quotes