| |
| |
| |
|
Comments:
<0> hey people
<0> i'm trying to create an animated gif
<0> is there a simple way to create the 'in between' frames easily? without creating each frame by hand?
<0> something that can take the "start" and "end" frames and create all the in between frames automaticaly
<1> hi all
<1> does gimpwin hase a phtot gallery plugin? like photoshop's webgallery function..
<2> hello
<2> hi
<2> sorry for my english but I want to be a question about Gimp
<2> someone can help me?
<3> don't ask to ask, just ask
<2> ok, sorry
<2> how I can admin the workspaces for the gimp looks like a simple window
<2> all in one window
<4> HorD: just use your window manager. Put all of the GIMP windows in one workspace.
<3> HorD, what OS?
<2> Ubuntu
<3> then you have some nice window managers available
<2> yes, so I work with it....
<2> but The Gimp can't do that?
<2> all in one?
<3> either dedicate a workspace for gimp, either find a window manager that knows about window grouping and all
<3> HorD, no, we don't want to put all in one
<4> HorD: just put gimp in its own workspace. I put the GIMP in workspace 5
<4> So win+f5 takes me to the gimp.
<4> If you really want your own window, just for the sake of making you feel better, you could run the gimp in Xnest
<2> Ardonik: you Use Ubuntu?
<4> Nope. Mandrivalinux.
<2> and KDE?
<3> what is the problem, you don't know how to add a workspace, or you don't want to add one?
<2> I hace 2 workspaces, that not is the problem...
<4> I have just eight.
<4> I need more.
<2> I just want work more how I like
<2> but, it's ok...
<2> just a question...
<2> thanks
<2> bye
<4> Adieu
<3> HorD, there are window managers who know about window grouping, if that's your problem
<3> but I don't use that so I don't know which ones
<4> That photoshop used the outdated MDI idiom should be no constraint on the GIMP's UI (though the GIMP UI has its own issues for newbies like me.)
<2> ok, thanks, I try to adapt it, realy thanks, bye
<5> hi, can anyone give me a hint why my gimp 2.3.10 on linux has trouble with xscanimage? I get the File->Acquire->xscanimage menu, but the contents (device dialog, bttv device, real scanner) are grayed out and not clickable? xscanimage alone works.
<6> hi all! how do i copy a layer from one image to another (without having the visible part centered as seems to always happen)-- i just want to copy the layer exactly as it is ???
<6> anyone home :(
<3> just drag and drop it
<7> mrspeck: works here fine, if the copied layer and the second image have the same size
<6> edhel -- drag and drop it!? i don't think so.. i'm trying to copy a layer from one image to another-- drag and drop is not working
<3> you can drag and drop from the layers dialog
<8> it should, really
<6> rubikcube-- the image i'm talking about has a lot of transparency around it-- and it is offcenter-- when i paste it in the new image it forces it to be centered
<7> mrspeck: drag it from the layrs dialog
<7> mrspeck: yes, but what is the layer's size? is it the same as the new image's canvas size?
<6> rubikcube, edhel-- oh cool!! now-- can you tell me how to do it with script-fu??
<6> yes-- same layer and canvas sizes
<3> err, drag and drop is just a UI feature, you don't care how the layer is pasted if you use a script
<7> btw, Ctrl+C and Ctrl+V worked as well for me...
<6> when i try a copy and paste with script-fu it gets centered-- i want it to stay offset like it does with the drag and drop
<6> Ctrl+C and Ctrl+V do NOT work for me.. are you sure you have something offcenter in your layer (with transparency all around)?
<6> the Ctrl+C seems to just copy the visible part (and gets rid of all the surrounding transparency) so that when it pastes-- it ends up pasting in the middle-- i don't want this-- i want it to keep the surrounding transparency
<7> yes, definitely. Are you sure about you layers's size? The size of the black and yellow line around it
<7> I used Ctrl+C without any selection
<7> Shift+Ctrl+A to get rid of any selection
<6> rubikcube-- oh wow-- that worked!!
<6> i had selected all
<3> you copied only the visible part if you selected
<6> now hopefully that will also work in script-fu
<6> rubikcube, edhel-- THANK YOU SO MUCH!!!!
<7> np
<7> edhel: do you know if that's intended beahviour?
<3> it is
<3> but maybe the UI is counter-intuitive about this
<7> ok
<6> it's counter intuitive to me, cuz i see the selection going all the way around so i ***ume the whole thing is being selected (not just the visible part)-- if it's just selecting the visible part maybe it'd make more sense to shrink the selection down to that so you know that's what it's doing....
<6> but that's just my initial (non-expert) impression
<7> what would be the use of selcting more than you can use in the end?
<6> so it pastes correctly :)
<7> better: what would be the problem about copying everything?
<3> if you use the l***o to select, you'd expect it to keep the transparent part for pasting? I wouldn't
<7> I would not care
<7> I could always resize the pasted layer to its visible parts
<7> maybe this should be configurable
<6> i'm still learning-- i'm sure after i get my head around this better it will become second nature to me as well-- and it will all make sense. It seems the essential thing to know is that selecting all only selects the visible parts, and if you know this then you're all good.
<3> unless it changes in next version because someone came up with a better proposal :)
<6> and i guess i already sort of figured that part out-- jsut didn't know i could copy when nothing was selected and force the entire layer to then be copied... but it makes sense after the fact now
<7> hehe, yes. IIRC 2.3 has had its feature freeze already
<6> i can't wait for ruby scripting :)
<7> yes, that part makes sence. because having an empty copy does not.
<9> Is there some kind of tool for smoothing or simplifying an image?
<9> /tool/script || filter
<10> depends on what you mean 'simplifying'
<10> you can posterize it, for example
<10> layer->colors_>posterize
<9> yes, i suppose it does depend on what I mean - I want to smooth the edges, decrease the granularity. I want the colours to stay the same
<9> thanks for the posterize thing though, I hadn't noticed that yet
<10> smooth edges --> maybe some kind of blur?
<10> bah, gone
<11> Hey gyts
<11> How do I delete a selection dot on gimp?
<11> (Before the actual selection is made)
<11> Poke
<11> (*sigh*)
<12> hello all
<12> nobody's online?
<8> nvictor: anything's wrong with the end of the topic?
<8> MegaByte: ctrl-****f-A ?
<12> dindinx: I wasn't going to ask a going
<12> question sorry..
<12> well, wanted to discuss with fellow designers... that's all
<13> hi
<13> i would like to know, can i tell gimp the filesize when saving a pic, in order to resize it comfortably?
<13> or can i only tell it the quality percentage?
<14> you can get a realtime preview and slide the quality and smoothing until it meets that file size
<14> uiaenrtd: click the 'preview' button
<13> thank you, that is great!
<15> Uh.. When did Gimp get Python-Fu?
<15> I haven't noticed it in 2.3.x until now..
<15> Let me add... :-D
<16> it has been there in 2.2 already
<16> I don't know if it was part of the source tree in 2.0, but it was certainly available as a plug-in even then
<17> hi guys
<17> is there a script that turns images to paths?
<17> some thing like vectorise
<15> Inkscape has functionality for that, omaremad.
<15> Unless you wish to do it manually.
<17> inkscape?
<17> cool
<17> is it seperate from gimp?
Return to
#gimp
or
Go to some related
logs:
#lisp
Public key for freshrpms is not installed
#python
scanelf ati
#python
beepmp fedora
Debian Fujitsu Stylistic 3500
#lisp
how to install perlbox on ubuntu
ubuntu + no windows manager
|
|