| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62
Comments:
<0> !!! the merge operation manually.
<1> dartelin: emerge --sync
<0> i did
<0> baselayout was updated
<2> I've defined that cdrom0 mounts at /mnt/cdrom, and then I found that /mnt/usb already exists. What is it used for? Would it be a bad choice if I defined that /dev/sda1 mounted at /mnt/usb? (For quickly mounting my MP3-player when it's connected)
<3> NeddySeagoon, hmm.
<0> kale, can i just emerge all packages maually ?
<4> How to put portage 3.7.3 on my gentoo SPARC install??
<1> dartelin: yes you can, but thats time consuming
<5> jburd, all the settings look good - is the wire damaged or not plugged in properly ?
<1> dartelin: run emerge -u world
<0> i make one big command
<0> i'm on stage 2
<4> hey dartelin
<4> How to put portage 3.7.3 on my gentoo SPARC install??
<3> NeddySeagoon, nope. That can't be possible, because I'm using the same computer and doze with the same configuration to connect right now.
<0> necrosan, i have no idea :)
<6> Necrosan: portage 3.7.3?
<1> dartelin: how long is it since you started your gentoo install?
<7> allievo: u can use any mount point or u can make your own dir there and mount it there like /mnt/mp3
<4> i heard from slashdot new LINUX
<8> Necrosan: #gentoo-sparc might be a better place to ask
<0> a few hours
<0> i don't remember, but it's very long
<0> 4 hour's i think
<3> So I need to install "dhcpd?"
<9> For some reason when I emerge --sync, it often seems to get stuck at around 50% when updating portage cache. When it does this the cpu temperature rockets
<5> jburd, OK ... can you test in linux after a power off restart please ?
<3> Ok. I'll do that too.
<9> any ideas?
<10> Kakihara, it's normal for it to slow there. The temperature rocketing thing is odd though, it's processing stuff but your machine should be well able to handle it
<10> i.e. cool it again
<2> HIGH-FREQ: Yes, but is /mnt/usb used for anything that I do not know of (I'm kind of a newbie)? I wouldn't want to mount my MP3-player there if it was used for something else :P
<10> if not, you need more fans :)
<2> HIGH-FREQ: Safest would be to create my own dir though I guess
<7> allievo: if its empty then its not being used....
<7> allievo: yes thats what i do...just create your own dir if u want
<2> HIGH-FREQ: ok, thanks!
<5> doc|home, ot cean the cat fur out of the heatsink
<10> NeddySeagoon, or that :)
<9> doc|home: lol - this CPU and these fans should be able to handle it. If was on 50% for about 4 mins before I cancelled it.
<7> no problem
<11> would I see any noticable difference in file system speed with the reiserfs v.3 vs. ext3, or only with reiser4?
<9> *It was on
<10> Kakihara, yeah, don't worry about that.
<9> doc|home: cheers
<10> Kakihara, just let it continue, but as NeddySeagoon suggested, you might need to clean out your machine :)
<2> So, now I'll configure my fstab for mounting my MP3-player, which contains a FAT16 partition. Then would this be correct "/dev/sda1 /mnt/mp3 FAT16 noauto,user 0 0", should I type FAT16 there or something else?
<12> Necrosan: Can we help you debian your gentoo box?
<9> Not easy on a laptop. The temp's alright now though
<8> GUIPEnguin: i don't really understand your question, but reiserfs 3.6 is quite fast, faster than ext3 a bit ,or so I have found. reiser 4 is very new, and it's annoying to get support for it (you have to patch the kernel), but my experimentation so far shows 4 is faster than 3.6 all around
<8> RiverRat: he was asking about portage on sparc, pointed him towards #gentoo-sparc (but he hasn't joined)
<6> Fieldy: he was asking how to install portage 3.7.3
<8> yeah i saw
<8> i just saw -ops too thanks
<6> i think he may well be a trollbot
<13> Fieldy: do you know when reiser4 will probably get into the mainline..?
<8> bedazzled: probably a half year or more, movement forward is slow, primarily due to hans reisers poor attitude on the kernel mailing lists
<13> Fieldy: i see... politics :/
<8> not really, he's just very pushy, almost abusive
<13> not sooner than 2.6.20
<8> there are changes being done now to prepare for 4 though
<14> So I wonder when reiser will get forked like xfree86
<13> Fieldy: VFS changes?
<8> bedazzled: exactly
<13> Dforge: lol
<15> hey every1 - following problem: migrated too Xorg 7.0 and now some font stuff is broken: "Could not init font path /usr/share/fonts/misc/" .... as result I get "could not open default font 'fixed'" - any help ?
<5> Dforge, didn't XFree86 just die ?
<2> Excuse me, does "FAT16" fit in fstab, or is it called something else?
<14> NeddySeagoon: Yes - I was referring to the reason hwy.
<0> anyone having problems with baselayout compilation ?
<16> allievo: vfat
<7> allievo: i believe its called vfat
<5> allievo, its vfat , not FAT16
<2> HIGH-FREQ, [idkfa] & NeddySeagoon: Thank you!
<13> NeddySeagoon: it hasn't made any release for a year
<17> hi guys, I have a quick c-related question: how do i write a function that takes in an char-type array, and an integer?
<18> anybody have any ideas on what to do to fix this? its mounted with a -o loop too http://www.rafb.net/paste/results/RCwOaE69.html
<8> ootput: try asking a C channel ( #C ?) , this is a gentoo support channel
<19> vfat is fat32... msdos is fat16..
<7> with vfat doesn't it determine what it is tho?
<14> XFree86 IMO basically was killed by a jackarse of a maintainer and deciding to use a license that wasn't gnu compatable.
<10> Dforge, language please
<10> Dforge, also try to keep it on-topic
<18> ootput void name(char *mychararray, int myint);
<14> doc|home: Sorry, just responding to neddy.
<15> any1 having an idea about my xorg question? :-[
<2> HIGH-FREQ: What do you mean?
<17> winkey: cheers
<18> ootput go buy k&r
<18> amazon.com
<7> allievo: Skunky knows better ;) i just thought vfat was the choice between any
<20> can anyone help me with an issue with samba pls? http://rafb.net/paste/results/0cnAOl25.html
<7> err...FAT system
<2> HIGH-FREQ: Ah, well we'll see if this works :)
<20> winkey: try umount -f
<5> Dforge, yep ... ant everyone joined Xorg ...
<8> |[piLL]|: try visiting #samba , and also subscribing to the samba-user (users?) mailing list, you can find info on that on their home page. it's a very active and helpful list.
<19> HIGH-FREQ: no, trying to mount a fat16 filesystem with vfat only sometimes works, in my experience. and when it doesn't work, it doesn't tell you why, other than saying "wrong fs type" kind of messages.
<7> Skunky: aaah....i c...your right ;)
<20> Fieldy: i have read the troubleshooting guides on the home page, and quite a few i found on google and i tried asking in #samba...
<3> Woohoo. :) Thanks a million NeddySeagoon. This has been an eventful day. *hug* :) A complete restart worked.
<21> i've got a problem with my raid5 array. When it boots it detects all four drives. But when it constructs the array it only uses 3 and kicks one form the array saying it was 'non fresh'
<8> |[piLL]|: okay, get on the mailing list then, that's the best source of help :) otherwise, continue running around in a circle :)
<21> hwo do I go about 'freshening' it :)
<18> |[piLL]| no go
<7> |[piLL]|: have u tried as root as well....just wondering if root was able to access it by chance
<1> ne0phyte: got mdadm installed?
<5> jburd, The problem is in both the Windows and Linux drivers ... on some cards, they get put to sleep on the way down in such a way that a soft start will not wake them up
<3> Ah-ha.
<21> kale: yeah, tis what I used to build/construct the array in the first place :)
<20> HIGH-FREQ: nope, root won't login either...
<5> jburd, You may find a soft start into Windows makes networking fail now. A power off is the only known fix
<20> winkey: did you get an error?
<19> ne0phyte: does the array come up successfully? does it not attempt to rebuild the 4th disk into the array by itself?
<1> ne0phyte: mdadm --manage --add /dev/mdX /dev/hdX
<1> ne0phyte: take a look at /proc/mdstat
<21> I will post my dmesg for you skunky and kale on pastebin....hang on
<3> Heh. That's ok. I use Windows only to test builds. :-)
<1> ne0phyte: just post /proc/mdstat
<7> piLL: those smb lines look fine....my problem was i didn't have the ports open...wouldn't go thru the firewall...but at least you got to the login screen...hmmm i dunno
<18> |[piLL]| umount: /dvd0: device is busy
<20> with the -f option?
<22> is ck-sources based on vanilla or on gentoo?
<23> hey
<18> |[piLL]| yes with -o
<18> erm
<23> isn't equery b filename used to find which package has a file?
<18> |[piLL]| yes with -f
<18> not awake
<23> like i want to install telnet, but don't know which package has it
<22> whyz, netkit-telnet
<20> winkey: try -fl
<19> whyz: netkit-telnetd
<22> yeah, with the d
<8> r00723r0: vanilla with the -ck patchset applied. note that it's an unsupported kernel. i.e. if you file bugs and are using that kernel, you'll get asked to use a supported kernel.
<21> skunky, ok i'll get mdstat. In the mean time there is this: http://pastebin.com/647901
<19> whyz: or um... telnet-bsd
<24> what is the gentoo game channel?
<18> |[piLL]| that worked
<22> Fieldy, is it faster than gentoo-sources?
<22> im a ricer
<18> thank you
<20> :)
<23> Skunky, i'll try netkit first.. but why didn't equery tell me where it was?
<8> r00723r0: no idea, i've never used gentoo-sources, only vanilla or mm
<22> does anyone know?
<25> LinuxMafia: #gentoo-games
<8> r00723r0: i hear nitro is fast though, i think that's also unsupported. but experimenting is fun :)
<22> nitro?
<25> whyz: i've always used telnet-bsd, it worked great
Return to
#gentoo
or
Go to some related
logs:
lacie big disk gentoo
#suse
lart_expert
zerocoolgamers
arecord no audio
mppe_decomp_alloc
Insert Packman CD1
ubuntu grip lame package lame is not available
baselayout reiser4
#css
|
|