| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2
Comments:
<0> shogunx: you will wind up building and running and i386 kernel.
<1> i'm kinda new to this programming and would like to know how to compile in gcc without a makefile, or at least how to make one if it's not possible
<2> gcc source.c -o binary_name
<1> if it's a c++ file source.cpp
<2> g++ source.cpp -o binary_name
<1> hmm how do i make .o files then?
<1> nvm
<2> -c
<1> thank you :)
<1> can't get it to work >;/
<2> g++ -c source.cpp
<2> will compile source.cpp to source.o
<1> hmm
<1> i can't get an executable
<2> g++ *.o -o my_executable
<1> would "g++ Hello.o -c Hello" be correct or do i need to add .bin?
<1> -o*
<2> I think you should real the man pageread
<2> -c is for getting object files, not executable binaries
<1> i typed wrong
<1> in here
<1> i did "g++ Hello.o -o Hello" in the term
<3> and what happened
<1> i got an error
<1> all i needed to do was g++ Hello.cpp -c Hello
<1> .P
<1> :P*
<4> whats -fno-unit-at-a-time option?
<1> what?
<1> -f <filename.filetype>
<1> case sensitive
<4> i want to know what is CFLAGS extra FLAG -fno-unit-at-a-time ??
<4> what is its use ?
<1> i don't know sorry :(
<1> i just learned to compile
<1> that's how good i am
<1> my advice, ask google ^^
<4> i did it already no results
<4> thats why i asked here
<1> :(
<1> did you read the channeltopic?
<4> no but i have gone thru makefile manual on gnu.org
<1> what about that channel?
<1> ##workingset
<4> Peacer, i downloaded Gcc 4.1.1 manual and searched for word -fno-unit-at-a-time and found nothing
<2> it'd probably be documented in the positive as -funit-at-a-time
<2> no match for unit-at-a-time either?
<4> but then how make file compiled source with that flag??
<4> will check it
<2> google finds some hits for "unit-at-a-time"
<4> am i checking under cpp.pdf is that right??
<4> i searched for complete word on google.com
<5> helloo
<5> i have a question
<1> k
<5> i am getting an error in installing a file using gcc
<1> installing a file?
<5> its getting me No rule to make target modules
<1> you shouldn't be talking to me then
<1> my experience: w00t i learned how to compile .cpp files
<5> oh k thanks for looking tho
<1> np :)
<5> hey guys what is error 2 in context of make command ?
<6> don't know sorry
<5> oh k
<6> look in the makefile maybe
<5> do they list errors ?
<6> nope
<6> but maybe you willl stumble across something
<6> going brb
<7> morning
<8> hey there, i'm trying to compile a new version o kernel but after i run the "make" command i get the following: http://rafb.net/paste/results/h535ds24.html
<8> GNU Make 3.81 , gcc version 3.4.6
<9> can someone help me build gnu c and c++ compilers? i want version 4.1.1 is these tarballs what i need? gcc-core-4.1.1.tar.bz2 gcc-g++-4.1.1.tar.bz2 and gcc-testsuite-4.1.1.tar.bz2 ?
<9> then i read this: http://gcc.gnu.org/install/test.html
<9> and i don't get what is "cd objdir; make -k check" where do i do that?
<9> i've got tcl, dejagnu and expect
<10> tarzeau: what distro you use?
<9> debian sarge
<9> variant: why?
<10> just curios
<9> we do many backports here for our workstations. but there's also a bunch of software that can not easily be backported
<9> and etch being set a release date of december is too late. we need gcc 4 for autumn 2006
<10> why do you need gcc4?
<9> bugfixes over version 3
<9> for some lessons held here
<10> i see
<10> afraid i cant help
<10> im off for lunch
<11> tarzeau: hi there
<11> tarzeau: you need only gcc or all the others too?
<9> intero: just gnu c compiler and c++
<9> intero: i know you from gnustep and obj-c .. right?
<11> tarzeau: yes =)
<11> tarzeau: okay, cd gcc
<11> mkdir objdir
<11> cd objdir
<9> inside gcc-4.1.1 ?
<9> and then?
<11> ../configure
<11> and eventually make
<11> check, there are options that allow you to build only gcc and g++, skipping ada and such
<11> (yes, inside gcc-4.1.1)
<11> you can: gcc-4.1.1$ links INSTALL/index.html
<9> intero: know links2 -g ?
<11> tarzeau: nope, trying now =)
<11> tarzeau: last time i checked it was not there yet
<11> tarzeau: cool =) is it working, btw?
<9> it's building something....
<9> i don't know what and how, but i'll test it
<11> good good
<12> I have a structure A_T which at it's start declaration I have another structure B_T having no field name: struct A_T {B_T; <other fields>}. vc6 compiles and runs perfectly, but with gcc I get the warning "declaration does not declare anything" and the same program crashes. Can someone explain me why it does that?
<9> intero: doing any gnustep still?
<11> tarzeau: not really, i dont have enough free time
<11> tarzeau: if you are in zurich, do you know anything about ETH?
<9> intero: yes i work there?
<11> really?
<9> yes indeed
<11> wow
<11> mind if i ask you a few questions about it, later on? i was planning to do a phd there...
<9> go ahead
<9> you're in italy now?
<11> thanks. yes, i am in italy
<11> and i am not sure yet about what to ask :) actually i only have a general question, which is how do you find it? any comments? what field are you working in?
<9> i'm in department of physics
<9> the wikipedia has some general info about ETH Zurich
<11> catalinux: paste some code somewhere please
<9> doing informatics here for the department and quite some institutes
<9> i get very positive feedback of foreign workers here that went abroad
<9> everything is very well organized
<9> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ETH_Zurich
<11> nice =) it's just that i am a little scared, maybe
<11> thanks
<12> intero: one second
<9> intero: scared of what?
<11> tarzeau: not being able of doing the work there, away from home, possible accidents that may occur, and so on
<11> :)
<9> intero: what did you study, and on what do you plan to do your phd?
<11> informatic engineering (?), which i guess is computer science there. about the exact field, i am not sure. i have seen many things i might possibly be interested in, and need to take a more detailed look
<12> intero: http://home.catalinux.net/x
<11> reading
<11> where is EVENT_TYPE_T defined?
<12> intero: it is defined somewhere else, but you got the idea
<11> catalinux: defined before or after?
<12> intero: before
<11> did you compile with gcc -W -Wall?
<12> intero: the idea is that the memory is not alocated for NET_LINK_STR_EVENT_T
<12> -g3 -ggdb3 -Wall -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wmissing-include-dirs -Winit-self -Wunused-parameter -Wunknown-pragmas -Wpointer-arith -Waggregate-return -Wpacked -Wcast-align -Wmissing-noreturn -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wformat-y2k -Wformat-security -Wfloat-equal -Wundef -Wold-style-definition -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs -Wextra -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wno-unused -Wno-unused-function -Wno-unused-
<12> parameter
<11> what happens if you turn declaration into: typedef struct {} EVENT_T; ?
<12> intero: if I put EVENT_T event; in NET_LINK_STR_EVENT_T the memory is alocated and all works
Return to
#gcc
or
Go to some related
logs:
lmms 0.1.4 ubuntu
suspend to desk i
#lisp
lpcj linux real
foxandxss
maple 9 install kubuntu
eggtray python
marvell gigabit genkernel
Kooldock twinview
#php
|
|