| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Comments:
<0> Yes, I've checked it, some of commands can be used, but some still cannot <1> Ji1, you can use /say to send them <0> oh. Let me try <0> yes, it works! :D <0> Thanks egeis <1> no problem <1> you know, I thought that // worked too. Did that work at some point in the past and get taken out, or am I remembering incorrectly? <2> hello I am having a seemingly strange issue with gaim+AIM protocol. As soon as I connect, I am disconnected. my screenname only works with pork and kopete (it WILL NOT work with either gaim or naim) -- I have a feeling there is a malformed bit of text in my profile that is causing it -- could this be it? thanks in advance for your time(s) <2> upon looking at a gaim -d run i find this (surrounded by more stuff too) : "oscar: major connection error" <3> ptolomey: Are you connecting through a proxy? <3> ptolomey: "major connection error" generally means the TCP stream had data on it that it should not have <3> ptolomey: I would hope that malformed text in your protocol wouldn't cause that error <2> KingAnt: well my main issue is that it is working just fine (has been for a while) in both kopete and pork <2> and i have had to do nothing proxy wise in either of those apps <2> hmmm -- i was diving into the "buddy_list" textr file created by pork im client -- it shows what looks like a blocked buddy that is actually a URL!? <2> could this cause a problem with gaim -- once it recieves the buddy list
<3> Maybe <3> Is it possible to unblock that buddy using pork? <2> I am going to look into it -- the problem is that it isnt an actual buddy -- it was in the text file marked as something else -- i am going to conteact the pork dev to ask what it means <4> Hmm... anyone else having trouble adding new MSN buddies in gaim 2.0 beta3? <5> No <6> i think it was decided that MSN is having issues <3> Hi warren <4> hi <4> I better sleep... <3> Cool. Good night! <2> ok still no answers: i have found this in my blist.xml : <block>http://www.dobit.com/emblin/</block> <2> why would I ever block a url in an AIM client?! <2> i swear i didnt do this on purpose <2> would this little guy cause some "red flags" when gaim tries to connect? <3> It shouldn't <2> as in -- an immediet disconnect <2> hmm <2> either way it shouldnt be there <3> Are the <block> tags a part of the buddy? <2> no <2> thats the full line cut+paste <3> Oh, right, duh <2> i tried going into a working IM client and unblocking the "user" but the change never holds upon next login <2> this is actually a problem thats 2 years old -- i am only now trying to fix it (im sick of pork for IM'ing) <3> I'm able to block and unblock that user, and signon with it in my block list with no problems <2> hmm -- well thats a ton of help (gutsy too) thanks -- i will try other things for now <3> Have you tried AIM Express? <2> the one that takes place with a browser? <2> not in 4 years <2> i will try <3> Yeah <2> wthell -- unsupported browser -- needs >=firefox 1.0 I have firefox 1.5.... <2> do i have to "useragent" switch this to work <3> No idea <2> well isnt that special: the aim build 1.5.286 for linux works just fine with my SN.... time to do some digging <7> Hello Everybody <7> Howdy <7> i want each account to be signed in different status by-default <7> is it possible? <3> radd1: With Gaim 2.0.0, yes <7> KingAnt: how? <3> Click on the status dropdown thing at the bottom of the buddy list and select "New" <3> And if you want to use the same thing everytime, save the status, then go to Tools->Preferences->Away->Status at startup <7> KingAnt: i want Yahoo account to be in invisible when signing <7> KingAnt: but my other accounts must be visible to others <3> In that "new status" window, click the thing that says "Use a different status for some accounts" <3> Also, let me know how the application could have been designed better to make this more clear <7> KingAnt: i'll tell you, in each account status windows, there should be a check box, called , Set default account Status, then show the same choices now shown in gaim window <5> radd1: alternatively, you could use the mystatusbox plugin. <7> Alver: in where it is available? <5> radd1: I believe it's part of the plugin pack. It should be up at guifications.org . <7> Alver: ohh ok <5> it'll give you a status box per account that can be hidden <8> KingAnt: do you include my suggestion? <3> Yes? <3> I'm not sure what you mean by "then show the same choices now shown in gaim window" <8> KingAnt: in set status drop down menu in gaim buddy list window <3> Oh, ok <3> I agree, we should do that <3> Show substatuses in the dropdown thing could get really messy, though <5> The status ui issue is a tough one - I can't remember any ui design being this hard to decide upon
<8> KingAnt: why? <3> There could be a lot of information to show <8> KingAnt: in where <3> In the status dropdown menu <8> KingAnt: yeahh, do one thing, remove the new and saved options to and its corresponding dialogs that would pop up when click, and leave the complicated status setting to plugin, <8> KingAnt: the status drop down menu would for normal users who use same simple status for all accounts <8> KingAnt: what do you think? <5> raddy: I'm fairly sure the mystatusbox plugin is what you are imagining <5> or it'd at least get close enough to be perfect for your needs <5> Maybe that plugin should be added to gaim by default <8> Alver: okk, buddy, but i am talking about Status UI that currently exists in Gaim 2.0.0 <5> raddy: hehe, yeah. The status ui is a very, very tough nut to crack. <8> Alver: shall we leave it the complicated status maninupation to the plugin? <9> how do you get buddy status to show up in the chat window in gaim2? <9> e.g "<name> has logged in/out" <5> raddy: 2.0 beta 1 had the functionality that is now moved to the mystatusbox plugin. Some people found it not scalable enough when used with lots of accounts <8> Inv1s1ble: enable buddy status notification plugin <5> that's when the current UI was introduced - which, in my opinion, wasn't an improvement, on the contrary <9> Alver, you talking about gaim2 vs gaim1? <9> err..I meant gtk1 vs 2 <5> Inv1s1ble: no <5> beta1 versus beta2 and 3 <8> Alver: the new status creation windows is simply not-at-all HIG, <5> raddy: which is why I don't use them <8> KingAnt: are you there? <10> can i use gaim on windows ce <5> #wingaim <10> uhh i got windows, I must be infective <10> lets all ignore the freaky windows user <10> pretend he doesnt exist <5> Oh, we wish they didn't exist <5> But since they do, we just redirect them to the room that is created to handle their crap <10> lol, I'll stay with Miranda then <5> We care a lot <5> Heh <11> Darn. <5> There was a lot of frustration in that boy's words <8> Hi KingAnt, current implimention also seems enough, but in my opinion remove the saved status new option, and move those to account configuration <8> KingAnt: and it won't generate extra information to account status, because "use different status for this account" option is optional <3> Hi <8> KingAnt: it won't generate extra information to account status, because "use different status for this account" <8> option is optional <3> I'm not sure how removing those two options would improve anything. They don't get in the way THAT much <11> What are we talking about? <3> The gtkstatusbox <11> Why would we remove 'New'? It's really useful, especially now that it prefills to the current status. <8> KingAnt: in my opinion, removing the two options and removing/improving new status creation window would be very meaning ful <8> deryni: it would be moved to per account configuration window <11> What window? <8> deryni: account creation window <11> You want to move the status control into the Modify Account window? <8> deryni: creat/modify account window <11> The Accoutns window (the one with the list)? <8> deryni: yeah <11> How would you do that (that wouldn't be confusing or really complicated)? <12> that's what i'd like to know <11> Also, what benefit would that have? <11> Would you remove the Status creating/editing window entirely? <11> Because if not then you need two dialogs to set a status and that isn't good. <8> deryni: actually set status drop down won't be touched. <11> Hm? <8> deryni: these are for default account status <11> Default when? <8> deryni: when signing in <11> Under what status? <8> deryni: i'll explain you <12> i don't see how the current system for selecting a sign-on status is deficient <8> deryni: take for example you a have hotmail account and yahoo account <11> Yes. <8> deryni: you want to be invisible in yahoo account always <8> deryni: so in yahoo account configuration dialog, you would be able to set this in , "Use a different status for this account" option <11> Right, you want to be able to say (for specific accounts) always-use-this-status-when-not-specifically-listed-in-the-current-status? <8> deryni: no not fully correct <11> What did I miss?
Return to
#gaim or Go to some related
logs:
vlc center channel windows ubuntu 945PL Neo ethernet #perl defoma missing mkcfm #web how to change crontab for perllib mplaer для ubuntu #physics #perl fedora 5 firefox libstdc
|
|