| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Comments:
<0> what is the use of livna.repo?
<1> how can i convert an xvid to (s)vcd or dvd?
<2> lion_king, to provide non-free software
<3> lion_king: http://rpm.livna.org/faq.html doesnt explain ?
<2> err patented err whatever.
<4> so less smart***comments mister xenix
<5> how come my fonts in linux look so crap?
<3> Milo-: rpm -q quanta
<5> (compared to *shudder* windows
<4> package quanta is not installed ;O
<2> psychotria, http://www.fedorafaq.org/#installfonts
<6> Milo-: when i said EXACT i meant --> tags --> other --> frame wizard
<2> rpm -Uvh http://www.mjmwired.net/resources/files/msttcorefonts-1.3-4.noarch.rpm
<6> ***uming everyone uses the same features you do with a program is not very smart
<3> xenix: is the name of the package quanta on your system?
<6> no
<5> daMaestro, yeah, the fonts are installed...
<6> but i do have quanta installed
<5> but they still look (rendered) crap :)
<4> xenix: if i say use frame wizard the program has frame wizard FEATURE what automatically makes the frame tags exactly like i did
<6> because, like most other kde apps, install one package .. get 900 apps
<3> xenix: oh..blah
<6> heh
<4> if the wizard is called frame wizard there is not much else what i could call it with
<6> Milo-: nevermind, it's impossible to deal with your "thought" process
<7> well, it's not a very effective workaround
<7> x dies as sson as any gl app runs
<4> gosh dont act like you know the program if you dont even know the basic features
<6> maybe not *impossible* .. just aggravating
<8> Can anyone here discuss a little bit about how the linux kernel is validated against various types of hardware?
<3> quux: what?
<5> i need to recompile XFS with the apple patent stuff enabled
<5> thanks
<7> quux: "validated"?
<4> not everyone builds their websites with tags from their own head
<3> quux: isnt this a question for the upstream kernel mailinglist?
<3> quux: or for #kernelnewbies ?
<6> quux: kernel.og < -- everything you need there
<4> some people needs help with building website and that's what the quanta is made for
<8> Jef: I've been seeing a lot of errors with a 2.6.x kernel against multiple SATA chipsets, and I wonder how these sorts of things are tested and if the results are public
<4> http://www.linuxchix.org/content/courses/kernel_hacking/ cool site for noobs ;D
<1> anyone know any fancy video conversion tools for linux
<6> i use quanta rarely.. i mostly use nvu, gedit and composer
<3> quux: 2.6.x covers a lot of kernels
<1> i bet some exist but,,,
<7> somedude, transcode, ffmpeg, mencoder
<3> quux: you'll have to ask specific kernel developers who deal with sata drivers as to what hardware they test against
<8> sure. My point is I am wondering if there's someplace where I can look at validation matrix of different kernels vs. different hardware
<4> i mostly use vi/gedit but sometimes i cant remember some bit of code i need to remember and cheat with guanta
<4> quanta*
<9> quux: if you think there are errors with 2.6. you should have been an early adoptor of SATA on 2.4
<3> quux: i seriously doubt there is an organized..public... database that you seek
<8> I've seen some hints it's an irq and acpi thing, but nothing definitive
<4> but xenix i didnt expect getting any help with the program from people who knows the features of the program worse than i do
<8> Bob I cannot go back in time; my issue arises with systems I'm building this week
<3> quux: the large linux vendors most likely have inhouse tools for this sort of thing as part of their enterprise release qa
<9> quux: about half of the FC2 Kernels would not boot to SATA
<6> figuring out why it's crashing doesn't necessarily require you to know every feature
<6> there are common troubleshooting steps .. but then ,, you're a noob
<3> quux: but im not aware of a public database that upstream kernel development uses
<4> i told you what features i used and you didnt even know the features
<4> that's not really my fault is it?
<6> nevermind .. find help elsewhere
<4> especially when i talk with the exact names what the program uses
<8> I really am not dying to know *why* it's crashing - rather I'd hope to find a proven hardware/kernel combination that fits my needs
<4> neither am i
<6> it doesn't crash for me
<6> that's my point
<4> i only asked is it normal to kde program crash when it's ran via gnome
<8> But if you guys aren't aware of such a public matrix, and my googling hasn't turned it up ... well, back to tril/error I guess
<6> i've run it on three systems now
<3> quux: im not aware of something highly organized... linuxquestions.org has a community built hcl list...but i'm not confident in it
<8> xenix: it only seems to happen under pretty heavy i/o load
<4> xenix dont try to help if you're not ready to help ;\
<8> major-long file copies, hundreds of GB
<4> that just pisses off both of us
<3> quux: xenix is in a different conversation
<4> you and the person who you're 'trying' to help
<6> Milo-: i am ready to help those that follow instructions and are half way intelligent
<6> you do not fall into those categories
<4> and there comes the insulting part
<6> more people than me have that opinion of your "logic"
<6> no
<6> not an insult
<6> an honest observation
<10> Milo-: it is "SOP" with xenix that is why he already has two nicks in the ban list
<4> ;p
<6> i have nicks on the banlist?
<10> xenix: quit playing stupid
<6> show me
<11> Milo-: KDE apps should work fine in gnome
<3> EvilBob: today that's Milo- role
<8> Heh, I recall seeing xenix somewhere else just earlier today ...
<6> i've not been banned from here and i really have no idea what you're talking about
<6> you went off on some other thing yesterday .. heh .
<10> xenix: %daehepod!*@* and %mindgame!*@*
<6> ?
<7> hrm
<8> Milo- good on ya for speaking out against superciliousness
<6> those are not my nicks
<6> you are mistaken
<7> aparently it's a difference between $(uname -r) and i686
<10> xenix: yeah and there are so many users from your town with your IP
<4> |Jef|: my 'stupidity' might have reason like less experience and knowledge with linux
<8> 'bout time more people took issue with that superior attitude BS!
<6> whatever you say..
<6> i'm done with this nonsense
<10> xenix: good
<3> quux: i think you missed the beginning of the conversation.. and perhaps its best to stay out of this
<4> if i had spent as much time as xenix with linux i would definitely know more than he does
<4> + i wouldnt be such an ***hole
<6> intelligent
<8> Jef: sure, sure. I just wanted to toss a little support. shutting up now ;)
<2> Milo-, it is lame you come in here and bash our distro and then take up our time
<4> im not bashing your distro
<4> i needed a bit guiding and this channel is fedora's guide channel last time i checked
<6> yes. you did
<3> quux: so you support users who walk into a channel and open up conversations with profanity and bigotted comments?
<8> Jef: no
<3> quux: then i think you have chosen to support the wrong side
<8> err, well, actually I try to remind them where their manners are
<8> perhaps. I have opinions ... but .. shutting up now ;/
<6> milo entered the channel saying "yum is a piece of ****" ..
<4> no i didnt enter the channel with that ;\
<3> xenix: can we stop rebroadcasting that
<6> then he pretends that isn't coming in and bashing the dstro as daMaestro suggested
<4> i had been here for while before i said that ;\
<4> and daMaestro you're definitely on the wrong channel if it's waste of your time to answer someone who needs some guiding
<4> and xenix go ahead and grow up if you cant hear apt-get user saying YUM ****S ***!
<4> go crying to the corner because here it's not needed
<2> Milo-, it does not sound like you are asking for much guiding bro.
<3> daMaestro: time to let it go
<11> wow
<12> who was that
<11> who pissed in the wheaties?
<13> do you only need disk one for minimal install?
<2> depends
<2> i needed 1 and 4... strange enough
<2> kernel-devel was on 4 and i needed that.
<3> xenix: not that I am blameless.... but can we try to avoid baiting users like Milo- in the future?
<6> will do.
<14> hello all i installed bittorrent using yum when i download the torrent file its not using the bittorrent client and i cant seem to locate the exec file for bittorrent anyone knows where its located?
<2> jafari, you might want bittorrent-gui
<14> so i do yum install bittorrent-gui
<14> ?
<2> that should work
<6> yes
<14> so what do i have installed now
Return to
#fedora
or
Go to some related
logs:
wine halo unload debugger
debian firefox 1.5 keeps crashing
outb slax
fspot fc4
#css
dreamweaver4linux
#css
#ubuntu
ezmlm qmail_has_prog_delivery_but_has_x_bit_set
#fedora
|
|