| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Comments:
<0> JoseBravo: ?
<1> i do that and it says sorry, this is not a valid nero disc image file!
<0> sponzor: well, use some initiative and figure out how to do it yourself
<2> DrNick, I have FC 4 installed into a VPS (OpenVZ) and I need to install Yum.
<0> sponzor: most of us have never even used Nero
<3> sponzor, right click on the open with nero
<3> DrNick, i have
<0> JoseBravo: ok
<3> JoseBravo, rpm from the the updates server
<1> ok i did right click on iso and open with nero. and the same error sorry, this is not a valid nero disc image file!
<3> sponzor, what version of nero
<1> nero express 6
<3> sponzor, i haved used that before without the problems you having
<1> yeah my friend opend the iso file in bs player and did that thing always open with bs player...
<1> is that a problam?
<4> coule be if it modified the file
<1> how to undo that?
<3> sponzor, redownload
<3> and test the check the checksums
<1> thats like 10 days :S and if i download again it will be again in bs player, i think when you do always open with bs player (or any other program) it does that all the time... so if i download again they will be still in bs player?
<0> it's possible the Nero Exress 6 can't do ISO files
<0> which would be stupid, because they're easier to deal with than the native NRG files, but hey, that's how they **** money out of you
<3> DrNick, it can i have burned, fc2-fc5 isos with it
<0> then how come you can't get him to do it?
<1> is there any program for iso burning?
<1> that i try
<1> ?
<5> cdrecord
<3> vnpenguin, for windows
<5> oh, sorry
<3> DrNick, cause he also has other software i know nothing about
<3> sponzor, remove bs-player
<1> ok
<1> that is good adia
<0> sponzor: switch to the Nero Burning ROM interface by clicking the Nero button at the bottom of the Nero Express window. Select File -> Write CD Image. Open the ISO image. Continue from there.
<6> hi
<6> im getting some problems installing core5, for some reason its saying that a package(talk) is currupt or cant be read
<3> Jonny0stars, did you check the checksum of the iso
<3> did you run the media test
<6> i checked media at the strart
<6> said it was fine
<3> but you didnt check the iso
<3> checksum
<6> no
<3> redownload
<6> what is the checksum ?
<6> you got a link ?
<7> Anyone know what aclocal (got a command not found during rpm rebuild) is?
<5> Jonny0stars, http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery?s=MD5SUM&gwp=13
<3> sorry JonathanD
<8> no prob
<6> i know what a md5sum is just need to compare it to the original
<3> Jonny0stars, there is the checksum file on the main server
<9> Ciphex: "yum provides aclocal"
<6> Southern_Gentlem: ahh iv found it now
<7> thx fedorared
<9> Ciphex: once you find the package you can "repoquery -i" it, with yum-utils installed. http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/yum/
<7> wow very cool, thx for the info
<9> You're welcome.
<9> Are the mirrors being particularly stupid? I get 6 Metadata does not match checksums while using yum.
<10> fedorared: happens every now and then...
<3> fedorared, yum clean metadata use the base urls
<9> Tempted to get a local mirror up.
<3> good idea
<10> fedorared: also, mirror updates are not instantaneous.
<10> fedorared: that is, after uploading a lot of RPMs, the indices have to be rebuilt and that takes time.
<9> Yeah, so random ones with the mirror lists make it a hit or miss thing.
<11> hi
<11> its possible i set ower to a path
<11> but that owner not exist
<11> let me think how can i explain that
<4> Good idea
<11> i am using pureftpd
<11> with mysql support
<11> and i want add users to mysql
<11> and give a autoincrement
<11> then
<11> the gid and uid not exist on system users
<11> i want set owner to that uid and gid
<4> MalMen, do you know hte difference between IRC and IM?
<11> no
<10> MalMen: look at the PAM modules for MySQL too...
<4> MalMen, in IRC people expect completelines expressions of ideas, not fragments over a dozen
<4> Grrr
<4> MalMen, in IRC people expect complete expressions of ideas, not fragments over a dozen lines
<11> ahhh
<11> lol
<11> soz
<4> avatraxiom, Hi Max
<12> Hey Bob-Laptop.
<12> Bob-Laptop: Did you ever send me those suggestions?
<4> no things got crazy around here with the respins
<12> Bob-Laptop: Oh, okay. :-) No problem.
<12> Bob-Laptop: By the way, I'm almost always on FreeNode, I'm just not always in the channel.
<4> avatraxiom, OK will note that
<13> I set my screen resolution to high in my install configuration. How can I change it and continue with the installation?
<13> Is there anybody out there?
<9> You're installing Fedora, and the resolution is wrong?
<3> system-config-display -reconfig
<10> acronos: over six billion people and counting...
<1> notting
<1> it wont burn :S
<13> Cntr-alt-F1 log in as root then type
<13> "system-config-display -reconfig"?
<4> --reconfig
<13> Remember that I am still in the installation first run of fedora.
<13> I can no longer see my screen in graphical mode.
<4> what version of fedora are you instaling?
<13> version 5
<4> start the install over
<13> Ouch! ok.
<4> why screw around it is not like have time invested more than you in taking a crap
<4> s/you/you would
<13> I usually don't take 1 hr craps
<4> well if you have 1 hour in to the install you have other issues
<13> You mean like ignorance of linux. I'll give you that.
<4> No
<4> the install takes 30 minutes on modern hardware tops
<13> It takes me a while to figure out the different settings. It should be a little faster this time.
<4> sure
<4> multiple installs are a good learning process
<13> k. acronos out.
<4> Hey PsychoDad
<14> moin Bob-Laptop
<15> Hello, Is there a yum way of installing the latest firefox?
<9> Astinus-: "yum install firefox"
<9> http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/yum/
<15> fedorared: it installed 1.0.8
<9> Astinus-: Fedora release 4 I suppose?
<15> that ***umption is true
<9> Astinus-: I was going to recommend this repo, but it's bit out of date. http://fedora.ivazquez.net/
<9> Astinus-: might as well "yum remove firefox" and get it from getfirefox.com
<9> Or get FC5.
<16> fedorared, how hard is it to update from fc4 --> fc5 ?
<9> I've never done an upgrade.
<9> Clean installs, some FC4 machines still.
<4> sponix, I had about 50% sucess using the FC5 DVD to upgrade
<16> Bob-Laptop: wow, thats not a very high rate ;)
<15> i remembed in redhat 5.2 times that i did those clean installs when trying linux for first time, thought fcx--> fcx+1 would be piece of cake
<7> I think I still prefer fc4
<16> people pick on slack, saying its package management is crap, but it sure as heck does a better job
<4> sponix, one system was a pretty clean FC4 install with only upadtes applied failed to boot up after
<17> rawr, got fedora online via my win xp box ;)
<9> sponix: better how? curious.
<9> I like strong package management. Every file owned by a package, I can tell what's installed, and update it easily.
<16> fedorared : slack uses standard tarBalls (tar.gz (tgz)) packages, but it keeps pretty good track of them, I've updated from slack7,8,10 easily
<7> how?
Return to
#fedora
or
Go to some related
logs:
#mysql
debian stable sarge unichrome
#lisp
#fluxbox
* Starting GNOME Display Manager... [fail]
mysql syncronize two tables
#perl
#php
#mysql
unknown option: log vim
|
|