| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Comments:
<0> its not that far
<1> lol
<2> like its -52 in anywhere in the usa
<1> I meant "about 52F."
<1> According to my GNOME Panel's weather applet doo-hicky...
<3> it is -46F in Antarctica right now
<3> coldest point in the US right now is West Yellowstone, Montana, at -31F
<0> -31F?
<0> thats messed up. global warming or microwave controlled weather
<0> something up man, theyre controlling stuff. orelse we screwed ourselves over with global warming
<4> can I change ownership on a symlink?
<5> No.
<3> lchown?
<3> chown -h?
<6> DrNick: lchown doesn't follow symlinks.
<3> yes
<6> DrNick: whereas chown could act uopon the file it is linked to.
<3> the -h option to chown causes it to use lchown(2)
<3> which will change the ownership of a symlink
<6> if hte system allows it.
<3> the only context where this will matter is in directories with the sticky bit set
<6> although I'm thinking about chmod vs chown.
<3> f13: the system allows it
<6> I'm sorry Dave. I can't allow that.
<3> -rw-rw---- 1 nicholas nicholas 0 Feb 17 22:53 a
<3> lrwxrwxrwx 1 nicholas nicholas 1 Feb 17 22:53 b -> a
<3> [nicholas@entropy ~]$ sudo chown -h root.root b
<3> -rw-rw---- 1 nicholas nicholas 0 Feb 17 22:53 a
<3> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 1 Feb 17 22:53 b -> a
<6> DrNick: yeah, I was thinking of chmoding. I don't think you can chmod a link can you?
<3> no
<7> can anyone help me with this one: http://zobi.pastebin.com/560752 ? Related to yum install on FC4.
<3> zobi[1]: what actually happens when you do yum install zlib.x86_64?
<7> DrNick: It says "No Match for argument: zlib.x86_64"
<3> do you actually have an AMD64 system?
<4> what ownership would a hard link have?
<3> mr-rich: names don't have ownernsip. objects do.
<7> DrNick: I hope so :) I signed up for an AMD64 Athlon dedicated server. Hopefully that is what they gave me. Anyway I can check?
<4> DrNick: well, I'm trying to symlink /var/spool/repackage so I can have more space on /var ...
<5> uname -a
<3> zobi[1]: and if uname -a does say x86_64, check what's in /etc/rpm/platform
<3> mr-rich: symlinks aren't hard links
<5> uname -a might say x86_64, but in the wrong place. Paste it here.
<4> DrNick: would a hard link work better in this case?
<6> zobi[1]: that fedora.repo isn't as shipped by Fedora. Did you modify it?
<8> hi i just want the feedback from all u people on the application on which i m working for...
<3> mr-rich: a hard link wouldn't free up any space on /var
<8> the url to my application is
<8> http://military-gps.souceforge.net
<5> Hardlinking dirs is a bad idea, and useless across filesystems.
<3> and not possible
<7> DrNick, ignacio: 2.6.15-1.1831_FC4smp #1 SMP Tue Feb 7 13:48:31 EST 2006 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
<3> zobi[1]: you got screwed
<8> so just join the mailing list the link to it is http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/military-gps-feedback
<5> That is *so* not x86_64.
<8> so that i can improve my application
<7> sh*t
<3> zobi[1]: although, you might just have an x86 distro on an AMD64 system, check what's in /proc/cpuinfo
<6> zobi[1]: time to call your sales person.
<8> with u guys valuable feedbacks... :)
<5> No, that isn't even a x86_64 system.
<3> ignacio: how can you tell? it says athlon, it might be
<5> It would say x86_64.
<3> or does uname figure that out these days?
<3> you're sure? it never did that for me back in ... uh ... FC1?
<6> ignacio: wrong.
<6> Linux yoda.loki.me 2.6.14-1.1656_FC4 #1 Thu Jan 5 22:13:22 EST 2006 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
<8> thanks... :))
<6> model name : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+
<5> Well that's annoying...
<7> http://zobi.pastebin.com/560762
<3> zobi[1]: yeah, you have an x86 install on an AMD64 system
<5> Alright, it is x86_64 then.
<3> that's fixable, but still irritating
<6> somebody f'd up.
<6> ignacio: I had lots of customers that wanted 32bit installs. Didn't care what hardware it came on, just wanted 32bit.
<7> is there an easy way I can fix it without having to go through them?
<3> zobi[1]: no
<6> zobi[1]: no.
<5> If they explicitly ask for it, sure. But by default?
<7> :) ok
<6> ignacio: no, not by default.
<7> Thanks everyone. I spent the whole day pulling my hair out. At least now that I don't have any left, I can go back to these guys and demand hair implants.
<6> zobi[1]: I cut all my hair off to save hair pulling.
<9> hi
<9> how do we set ident on xchat please ?
<5> install authd and open auth/tcp.
<9> authd ?
<5> No, the other authd.
<9> whats that
<9> yum install authd ?
<10> Hey all I have a Box Running FC4 Just installed it Have a Cirrus Logic GD5480 Vid Card and an ASTVision 7L monitor dosent seem to work with X I had to do a Text based install Can someone please help me get X working on this box I have 4 of these boxes went through this a month or so ago and finaly gave up now I need to get it working
<5> Ask in #xorg if 6.8.2 supports that card.
<10> waiting for a responce
<10> fixed this issue found out there is a bug in FC4 and Xorg 6.8.2 you need to remove xorg-X11-6.8.2-31.rpm and install xorg-x11-6.8.1-12.i386.rpm and it works
<10> in case anyone comes accrossed an issue again
<11> any one try upgrading from mysql 3.x to 5.x on FC3?
<12> HamYaI, yes
<13> everytime i try to ./configure, comes this problem; "configure: error: no acceptable C compiler found in $PATH" , help
<14> Install gcc.
<15> hello
<13> AutOPSY, where can i find gcc?
<15> i want to ask one basic question about dhcp. What if i set ddns-updates on, and ddns-update-style none? Will ddns updates will be still done. Since, update style is none insted of ad-hoc. am just confused..i know what each of them means seperately but when i put them togather it looks mess. and if fffns udate will be done am i compromising on security by seting ddns-pdate-style to none
<15> fffns==ddns ..sorry for typos
<15> bbl anyway
<14> luishhc, where can you find gcc? Uh.. Fedora Core repository I would hope.
<16> hello all
<14> luishhc, it is even on your installation CDs.
<13> everytime i try to ./configure, comes this problem; "configure: error: no acceptable C compiler found in $PATH" , so how can i install gcc if i can't "./configure" ?
<13> AutOPSY, i found
<13> AutOPSY, but how can i install?
<14> See: man yum
<13> AutOPSY, everytime i try ./configure comes this error
<14> See: man system-config-packages
<14> luishhc, run: rpm -q gcc
<14> What does it say?
<13> say that gcc package is not installed
<14> Exactly.
<14> 10 minutes ago I said "Install gcc."
<13> yes, i'm downloading gcc-4.0.2.tar.bz2
<16> no man, udse rpm
<14> Well, you can cancel it.
<16> use
<17> what version of gnome will be incorporated in Core 5
<14> Gnome 2.12
<17> will it be gnome 2.14 or is that slated for release later
<14> Oh, maybe I don't know.
<13> AutOPSY, so, how i do it?
<16> from locations mentioned by AutOPSY
<17> dam, I was just reading about this amazing peformance increase stuff in 2.14
<14> Look at what is in the development repository.
<17> wasit must be the same version of evo with 2.14 and 2.16 then
<17> sorry I mean 2.12 and 2.14
<17> maybe they both use eveo 2.6
<14> mwright1night, http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/SRPMS/
<14> Whatever is in there should be going into the Fedora Core 5 final, I think. That or check what is in 4.92.
<17> I was waiting for test3
<13> you mean, install a gcc.rpm package?
<17> is Core 5 pretty stable
<17> ie it took a while for core 4 to really stabalise
<18> luishhc: yeah
<17> I went bleeding edge and implemented core 4 straight away, which was mostly worth it cause we needed a few things including oo2
<14> No it didn't.
<13> where i find it?
<18> luishhc: yum install gcc
<14> Fedora Core 4 was stable as it were released.
<13> AntonTakk, k, i'm doing it
<19> gosh the xen guest installer script works like a charm
<19> graphical installer n all
<14> What is Xen, anyhow?
Return to
#fedora
or
Go to some related
logs:
#php
#perl
#xorg
#iptables
#lisp
#php
fluxbox 1680x1050
#osdev
#web
libmysqlclient.so.15 debian
|
|