| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Comments:
<0> ontehline22: without selinux being enabled?
<1> |Jef|: That's exactly what i'm telling you
<2> the same file played smoothly under windows
<3> rjune: Ok .. that would explain why it's on my system.. It's installed by default?
<2> i dont know if it's a codec's problem or my video driver's problem
<4> stormzen : Livna is good, but conflicts with some other repos......just be careful.
<0> ontehline22: i think you underestimate the capacity to configure apache insecurely
<5> no. you installed it. most likely following my instructions
<4> i.e. just wear a rubber
<3> I was reading at dag's site that his RPMs were not compatible with Livna's...
<1> |Jef|: IM A DAMN GOOD COP!!
<6> hehe
<5> |Jef|: the really bad ones are the ones that never show up here to see the results of their handywork
<6> relabel broke it again, so I made the change manually.
<5> foxtrot tango whisky?
<0> stormzen: lets put it this way.. i recommend livna over dag
<1> the bird is IN the NEST!
<0> stormzen: opinions vary
<0> stormzen: do whatever you feel is best
<1> stormzen: Don't listen to him, he's a noob
<0> stormzen: i believe in livna because livna is a community of packagers modelled on how Extras works
<0> stormzen: i believe in that community process.. so i recommend livna
<1> stormzen: No, it doesn't
<1> stormzen: I don't reccomend it.
<5> ontehline22: |Jef| is not a noob
<3> |Jef|: Ok. So, if I want to stick with livna (please ontehline22) ... where would I find SRPMs that I can repackage? ( I just found out how to do it today... I'm pretty excited about it. )
<1> rjune: You use KDE, so yoru not int eh position to decide
<3> I'm a noob, ontehline22, not |Jef|.
<5> stormzen: let me put it this way, I won't submit a package to dag, I will submit it to livna
<0> rjune: who gave ontehline22 sugar and got him all wound up?
<5> dunno
<3> maybe his medication ran out...
<5> indeed.
<1> HAHAHAH, Your funny storm
<1> hahaha
<1> ...idiot
<0> ontehline22: feel free to avoid the name calling
<1> |Jef|: I'll think about it
<7> Sonar_Guy, It must be a policy error. There is a tool called audit2allow <audit message> . You feed it the aduit message and it spits out a policy rule to allow the action. If you are interested in attempting to fix it...
<0> mutk: reportable
<0> mutk: as well
<8> Note that audit2allow isn't always the correct response.
<5> I'm getting ready to look at istanbul |Jef| you touch it at all yet?
<7> |Jef|, I think it's already Bugzilla'd..
<1> Note that notes note tote note.
<3> rjune: Ok. So it would be safe then to repackage FC4 repos ?
<7> ignacio, No not always, but it has a good stab at it..
<1> stormzen: No
<3> rjune: nvm that question.
<0> rjune: no i havent touched it.. i cant till tmorrow night when i get home
<5> you mean for CentOS?
<0> rjune: tonite is stay a work night
<3> rjune: Wait till I can coherently ask it.
<5> |Jef|: everynight is a stay at work night for me.
<1> |Jef|: I work for your moma
<7> ontehline22, Let me guess, sweet strong coffee, right?
<0> ontehline22: last warning
<1> mutk: yes O.O
<1> |Jef|: toast.
<7> ontehline22, Ok behave ofr dissappear is my best advice :)
<5> |Jef|: I wish I could /ignore sometimes.
<9> How do i rebuild a module i deleted, somehow I got rid of lirc_i2c ?
<1> rjune: You use KDE.
<7> Samsonpwnz, Download and install the kernel again.
<5> Samsonpwnz: easiest way is to downlaod and resinstall the package
<1> rjune: You use KDE.
<5> ontehline22: I'm not allowed to ignore. don't use that as an excuse to harr*** me please.
<9> I reinstalled the package, that didnt restore it.
<9> im in the process of rebuilding the kernel, will that fix it?
<1> rjune: i'm not harrasing you, it's just a statement
<10> Samsonpwnz: was it owned by the package you reinstalled?
<1> rjune: You use KDE.
<7> Samsonpwnz, I don't beleive you.
<10> Samsonpwnz: umm, what kernel is this anyway?
<5> Samsonpwnz: then perhaps it went away when you updated.
<1> rjune: Why does it offend you?
<9> 2.6.16-1.2080_FC5
<9> lol why dont u believe me?
<3> rjune: That SRPM that I gave you was from RPMForge, wasn't it?
<5> it doesn't. but there is enough to deal with in here without you going on incessantly about irrelevancies
<5> stormzen: which one?
<5> root-tail?
<3> root-tail. ONly gave you the one.
<5> maybe.
<7> Samsonpwnz, Ok, what kernel are you currently running ?? uname -a
<9> Linux mythtv 2.6.16-1.2080_FC5 #1 Tue Mar 28 03:38:34 EST 2006 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
<5> LOL
<5> where did you get mythtv?
<10> lirc_i2c isn't in the kernel btw
<10> so you got that from somewhere else
<7> Samsonpwnz, What happened when you re-installed the kernel? Exactly _how_ did you re-install it ?
<9> because this is my mythtv box
<10> Hello Magic8Ball
<3> What is mythtv?
<5> I.... smell.... atrpms
<5> stormzen: sweet program. http://www.mythtv.org
<10> stormzen: mythtv.org fancy mediacenter PVR thingie
<5> I'm working on fedora clean packages
<10> stormzen: and a monster to package so only atrpms has it. :P
<5> AndyCap: Bzzzt
<10> rjune: publish or perish. :P
<5> it requires libs that are newer then in fedora, and nobody wants to overwrite them
<11> grrrr, "than", not "then"
<3> ahh... I've heard of this.
<1> misfit_toy: Shut up, thanks.
<11> ontehline22, no thanks
<1> misfit_toy: ok.
<5> AndyCap: http://home.bravegnuworld.com/~rjune/rpm
<5> it's in there soemwhere
<12> what happened to the 'install everything' option in FC5?
<5> let me knwo how it works. I havent' had a chance to play with it yet
<7> ontehline22, Why are you here?
<10> warthog9: it's gone. search bugzilla or the fedora-devel list if you want to know more.
<12> AndyCap- thanks ::goes to see what he can find::
<5> AndyCap: it requires core, extras, livna, and possibly some things in that URL someplace.
<10> warthog9: I had a bug# somewhere, but it's not in my history.
<5> I have to clean it all up and submit it yet.
<10> ah, and it's 0.18. :P
<5> I have about 5 or 6 packages to submit yet.
<5> what? grumble, I have 0.19 somewhere
<1> rjune: I have about 6-8, btu who's counting..
<12> AndyCap- I'll see what searching in bugzilla gets me, it's kind of annoying the everything & minimal options are were DARNED useful
<10> warthog9: there is a bug about it for kickstart, but I think it's gone from the gui forever.
<13> hi im trying to build a driver and i am getting the following error.. http://pastebin.com/658896 does anyone know what i am missing?
<13> or realy im trying to get my Realtec RTL8185 wireless card working... the driver from their site doesnt load with insmod so im trying this 3rd party driver
<3> rjune: Does it matter where I get my SRPMs from if I want to rebuild them for FC5?
<10> stormzen: most likely yes. the more alien the source, the more you have to fix/unbreak before it works. and probably more before it's a good package
<10> stormzen: so a FC3 rpm is probably better than a suse 8 or atrpms (custom macros) one.
<3> AndyCap: Would FC4 repos be pretty safe, then?
<0> AndyCap: atrpms still uses custom macros?
<10> |Jef|: I dunno if the FC5 repo does that, so I guess I should have qualified that statement with a point in time
<3> AndyCap: I'd like to experiment with repackaging, but I'd like to do it safely. I'm running FC5. Any recommendations?
<0> AndyCap: as in macros not provided in an additional atrpms rpms?
<0> AndyCap: i think that was changed a long time ago
<10> |Jef|: probably has then.
<0> AndyCap: as much as a personally avoid recommending atrpms.. i avoid making statements about deficiencies with its current packaging
<0> AndyCap: since that would require me actually spending time examining them... which i dont really care to do
<4> winner of the most tentative statement ever
<0> kjm: its a moral delima.. i really really want to tell people those packages ****..but i don't want to spend the time detailing why they ****.. so i just avoid it
<1> Why do they ****?
<10> anyhow, it's still a problem he's likely to run into if he rebuilds packages from wherever.
<1> lol
<0> kjm: id rather provide accurate information about the repos i actively use
<0> AndyCap: thats certaintly true.. if he doesnt know what the buildsystem the packages are designed for is...
<0> AndyCap: and he cant replicate that build environment
<0> AndyCap: thats the really nice thing about Extras use of mock
<3> mock?
Return to
#fedora
or
Go to some related
logs:
debian kernelpath
free.partitioner windows
libpq++ ubuntu
#perl
#gaim
php mysql connector default charset
k3b could not find input file
#linux
namp for ubuntu
dhcp windows refresh ip address
|
|