| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Comments:
<0> how do I install fedora in text mdoe?
<0> mode
<1> The first screen of the installer is a help screen.
<0> not for me
<1> Your CD must be unique, then.
<0> if just boot the default kernel I just get "You do not have enought RAM
<0> to install Fedora Core on this machine"
<0> in a ncurses installer
<2> mikearthur, How much RAM do you have?
<0> 64M
<2> Not enough..
<0> says it is to install in text mode
<0> you can run fluxbox and a few xterms and irssi easily in 64M
<2> mikearthur, Read the release notes? http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/release-notes/fc5/release-notes-ISO/#sn-Installer
<2> Minimum RAM for text-mode: 128MiB
<0> where does it say minimum
<0> sorry,
<2> mikearthur, It is not 'run time' limitation. The installer needs min 128MiB
<0> lol
<0> fair enough, another distro for me
<2> mikearthur, Sorry bout that too. :)
<0> fairly crazy that a ncurses installer REQUIRES 128MB of RAM
<2> mikearthur, It's anaconda.
<0> even in text mode?
<0> also, the release notes don't specify minimum memory for PPC
<0> recommended yes, minimum no
<2> mikearthur, Yes. It is the _installer_ that requires the memory, not the graphics.
<0> no worries
<0> you might want to indicate those memory requirements for ppc, rather than saying recommended thoguh
<0> though
<2> Yeh.
<3> mutk, you got Mugshot?
<2> perry753, Not yet. Pretty cool though..
<2> perry753, My neice wants to set it up so it's appealing for 12 year olds :)
<3> aw... I just got an invite today but I need more friends. =)
<4> hi
<3> Lol
<4> I cannot get artwiz fonts working on fluxbox (aterm: can't load font "lime"), but it is installed (by rpm package) and working on gnome
<5> perry753:hello
<4> can somebody help me?
<6> Moo
<6> Can't run a yum update
<6> Missing dependency, which I can't install, because it complains about the dependency again
<6> Weird thing is, I've got the file :\
<7> Same issue here. Usually when this happens I've found an update info in the topic. But I don't spot it
<6> libecal-1.2.so.3 ?
<8> same here
<8> been like that for a few days now
<9> do this:
<9> yum --exclude evolution\* update
<9> this will resolv temporarily
<9> until the next evolution update is made
<8> ah good idea, thanks
<6> It's gnome-panel that complains though
<8> Error: Missing Dependency: libecal-1.2.so.3 is needed by package gnome-panel
<8> Error: Missing Dependency: libecal-1.2.so.3 is needed by package evolution
<7> Thank you, Eitch
<6> Nevermind, worked
<6> Arigatou, Eitch
<9> douitashima****e
<9> :)
<6> :P
<7> heh
<8> yeah thanks Eitch , am upgrading now minus the evolution issue
<9> vvviper|a: :-)
<6> Hmm, weird
<6> Isn't Evolution that e-mail app?
<7> Yes
<6> I don't think I have it
<6> Yet it tries to update it?
<7> You may have a componant of it.
<6> Ok
<9> evolution-data-server is the package with problems
<9> it is tied with the gnome stuff
<9> (...)
<6> Alright
<10> hi, i'm trying to get the updates and the transaction test says that libecal-1.2.so.3 is needed for package: evolution-sharp, gnome-panel and evolution. But i have that shared object at /usr/lib/libecal-1.2.so.3. Any idea?
<11> What distro?
<10> fedora5
<11> I ***ume FC?
<11> Right.
<11> yum install libecal
<11> yum search libecal
<10> searching...
<2> jorgeu, I beleive there was a packaging problem in latest updates. Not sure about any fix yet though. Apparently e-d-s was bumped up a version.
<4> pls can somebody help me?
<4> I cannot get artwiz fonts working on fluxbox (aterm: can't load font "lime"), but it is installed (by rpm package) and working on gnome
<10> No Matches found
<10> mutk: maybe, but in that updates i see both e-d-s and evolution to be updated
<2> jorgeu, Not maybe. I know :)
<10> mutk: so, should i wait updates for the updates? LOL
<1> Ignore e-d-s and the update will complete.
<9> again:
<10> shaoran-kun: so i will have to ignore both s-d-s and evolution
<9> do this: "yum --exclude evolution\* update" - this will resolve temporarily until the next evolution-data-server package update
<2> jorgeu, Yeh two workarounds - Wait OR ignore eds
<1> jorgeu, ignoring just e-d-s is fine.
<10> ok
<10> updating...
<10> shaoran-kun: i have to exclude all evolution* evolution-webcal needs the e-d-s
<1> Exclude evolution-webcal too.
<1> You can leave evolution. Or ignore the whole thing, if you don't use it.
<10> done
<12> HELLO FRIENDS
<12> JoseBravo, hello sir!
<13> Does any one know of a way to have xenguest-install.py install a fedora guest on to a real disk rather than in to a file?
<14> I get the kernel-smp rpm for FC4
<14> And when I boot
<14> And try to send ping I get: operation not permitted
<12> markdrago, are you sure its not just a loopback filesystem which you can mount with mount -o loop -t <reiserfs?> blah.filesystem /mnt/blah/
<12> JoseBravo, ping as root
<12> it uses icmp pings
<15> yum upgrade fails: Error: Missing Dependency: libecal-1.2.so.3 is needed by package evolution-sharp
<15> Error: Missing Dependency: libecal-1.2.so.3 is needed by package evolution
<15> known problem?
<12> which might only be allowed by root
<16> blarney: yes
<12> blarney, new to me
<10> blarney: yum --exlude evolution\* update
<10> blarney: evolution updates are broken
<13> HelloFriends: Well, I have already done that, but I want to make the guest's filesystem accessible over NFS and I don't think I can do that with a loopback.
<13> Oh wait ... I guess I could.
<13> If I just mount the loopback and then expose its mount point over NFS, that should work, right?
<15> jorgeu: has there been a bug filed?
<14> HelloFriends, im doing it as root
<13> hmm... maybe not b/c fedora actually has paritions created inside of the disk image
<15> jorgeu: how is possible to Core to push out updates like this with so blatant dep problems?
<10> blarney: don't know, i had the same problem and i found people that knew that workarround
<1> blarney, good question.
<15> jorgeu: surely that would have shown up when it was in testing?
<10> blarney: so i think that it does
<17> hi - my yum update is failing. gnome-panel requires libecal-1.2.so.3 which appears to be part of evolution-data-server-1.6.1-1.fc5.2 but I have evolution-data-server-1.6.2-1.fc5.1 which provides libecal-1.2.so.6. I don't know the difference between the .3 and the .6 - or what to do. any ideas?
<12> markdrago, try a bind mount to the nfs dir?
<1> rjhall, known problem. Ignore evolution\* and it will work.
<16> markdrago: you can loopback-mount stuff with partitions with the 'offset' option
<15> rjhall: just noticed the same problem
<12> markdrago, or put a symlink on the nfs drive tot he mounted filesystem...why wouldnt it work? im expecting it to be read-only btw
<16> you only need to ignore evolution-data-server\*
<16> evolution itself is ok to update
<10> rjhall: yum --exclude evolution\* update
<16> iirc
<1> dwmw2, you need to ignore evolution-data-server and evolution-webcal.
<1> Just ignore the whole thing and wait for the issue to be fixed.
<12> JoseBravo, then you dont have the modules or you need to add icmp ping to the kernel
<10> dwmw2: i had problems with evolution-webcal
<13> HelloFriends: it's not read only - I want to use this craziness to get xen live migration to work.
<17> ..trying...
<13> I'm giving a presentation at my LUG about it - so it isn't something that has to be too practical.
<16> ah, I'm not sure any of my machines have evolution-webcal installed
<15> rjhall, jorgeu: it's filed as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/194430, just FYI
<16> in fact, any machine on which I actually _use_ evolution has my own build of e-d-s and evo packages anyway
Return to
#fedora
or
Go to some related
logs:
clm-6006 reiserfs meaning
#lisp
#perl
error installing tls module amsn fedora
wenas definition spanish
filadoda
#centos
Manifest file not found ebuild
lisppaste howto
ubuntu XF86_Banshee
|
|