| |
| |
| |
|
Comments:
<0> the topic says cnames aren't what you think, why doesn't the topic do justice and explain it or a the least link to an explanation instead of insulting random ppl?
<1> not random people those that come here and have no idea why cnames are bad.
<0> well if they don't have an idea, why not help them?
<0> i don't mean to sound pushy, it just seems like a **** thing to do.
<0> does anyone have opinions on dyndns?
<0> i've been trying to make a popular website for about 4 years now, and i've finnaly got some traffic, it seems like my server can't handle it and a google search suggested round-robin dns server distribution, which dyndns seems to do, any suggestions?
<0> or experience?
<1> most likely the code is slow... if you used static pages just about any computer made in the last 10 years can dump static pages on to the fastest pipe you can afford.
<0> yeah, the code is very slow, but that is why people go to the site, and it is relatively complex, uses mod_perl, since I didn't write it, other methods of speeding it up may be cheaper.
<0> maybe i'm a newb and i'm overlooking something obvious though but it seemed like getting more servers would give me more bang and more fault tolerance if one failed
<1> yeap.. perhaps use squid to cache pages that don't change often.. when generate a page every time some one comes when it only changes once every 5 minutes
<1> AI_coder, get a sun t2000... it can handle any web load you throw at it...
<0> i've done a little research and caching doesn't apply to me because the pages are unique for each visit
<0> i haven't bought a server yet, i'm using a vps and the next step would be a dedicated, following that multiple, or at least that was my plan (which can be flawed)
<0> vps = virtuozo/xen virtual machine on a real server so I share a server with a few other ppl
<2> how can i push registry keys/paths with w2k3 gpo?
<3> hi!
<3> anyone here?
<3> well, I've just have a newbie question
<3> I'm using a DNS server and a DHCP server
<3> splitted in different machines
<3> just want to know what's the right way to set up a machine
<3> I mean, I thought a server has to be in the DNS server
<4> seems fine as you have it.
<3> butr
<3> but
<3> to set up a personal machine
<3> it is better to gave it a static ip using the DNS server
<3> or to give it a dynamic ip with the dhcp server?
<3> does the DNS server know about a dynamic ip machine?
<4> depends.
<5> static ip can mean more administration but serving from static ip is easier
<3> I see
<3> but then, how knows about static ip addresses?
<3> the DNS server knows about NS, MX and CNAMEs
<4> and a.
<4> (and loc and srv and ...)
<3> aha
<4> keep it up to date.
<3> but, the DHCP server configured with some static ips matched with their MAC adresses is who give the actual IP
<3> so, to make it easy
<3> for a machine to get an IP and be set up in the DNS server I've to set it up in the DHCP table a
<4> configure something to keep dns updated.
<3> for a machine to get an IP and be set up in the DNS server I've to set it up in the DHCP table AND in the DNS server
<3> right?
<4> that's certainly one way.
<3> ok, thank y'all
<3> :)
<5> for me just setting up static ips on my network is easier
<5> only 1 server to maintain then
<3> uhm
<3> the fact is that I've 2 DHCP servers in balanced-mode and one DNS server (which acts as a mail server too)
<3> (don't really ask me too much, I didn't set everything up so know I've to keep fixing all the problems the lan has)
Return to
#dns
or
Go to some related
logs:
#linux
#perl
postfix doesn't log
how to configure xvnc in i810 xorg
#suse
shell text editor suse
Syntax error decompyle
#linux
mysql_num_rows autonumber
syncmaster 763mb suse
|
|