| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47
Comments:
<0> fwest: does swsusp already work for you?
<1> P4C0: sounds good to me
<2> stew, thanks for all, gtg, c u
<3> Hi to all, just a qestion about the Release.gpg. Someone can help me?
<0> !justask
<0> the bot is slow.
<4> @ask
<5> If you have a question, just ask away on channel. If somebody knows, they'll answer :) For best results, be specific, informative, complete, concise and on-topic! Don't ask if you can ask a question first. It's a bit redundant and it makes some folks grumpy. Please don't be demanding or insulting. Remember, we're all volunteers. Finally, please don't /msg people ...
<0> !justask is If you don't ask your question, we can't answer it. :)
<6> jspiro: okay
<7> !no just ask is <reply> see ask
<6> abrotman: okay
<7> erm
<7> !no justask is <reply> see ask
<6> okay, abrotman
<0> !justask
<6> If you have a question, just ask! For Example: "I have a problem with ___; I'm running Debian version ___. when I try to do ___ I get the following output ___. I expected it to do ___." Don't ask if you can ask, or if anyone uses it, or pick one person to ask (ask the whole channel!). We're all volunteers; make it easy for us to help you. If you don't get an answer, ask later or ask debian-user@lists.debian.org
<0> a bit long.
<7> it's better that way
<0> yeah.
<0> it *is* informative.
<7> you'll get "Anyone use blah?"
<7> otherwise i mean
<8> so is just ask ;)
<0> not as much.
<8> just ask
<0> !smart-questions page has a lot of examples of really bad questions like what abrotman described.
<8> pretty effn informative
<0> !smart-questions
<9> Please, message the bots whilst training them.
<7> jspiro: what are you trying to do?
<7> jspiro: oh .. nevermind .. i undersatnd
<0> abrotman: i was trying to make a point and retrieve a bot info at the same time.
<7> you can't .. but ok .. i get it
<0> !smart-questions is a guide that will help you get the most out of IRC. Why don't you check it out? http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
<6> jspiro: okay
<3> I have my internal debian mirror and I want to create my Packages.gpg, so I create it with gpg --output Release.gpg -ba Release, modify my sources list to point to it, but now on apt-.get update, I receive "W: GPG error: file: testing Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available:"
<0> Maulkin: if i do not train the bot in public, how will people know the factoid is there? :)
<7> jspiro: how about .. check the bot
<9> jspiro: Through use or the factoid db? :)
<0> abrotman: what?
<9> mic_p: gpg --export -a <keyid> | apt-get add -
<0> Maulkin: trye
<0> *true
<7> jspiro: many of those items are already there .. as was taht
<7> !smart-questions
<6> Go here to find out how to ask intelligent questions: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html - Be sure to look at the section http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#before - This FAQ has information to help many users solve their own problem more effectively and to help users interact more effectively with computer experts.
<7> see :)
<0> oh. doesn't the bot require "is also" in such a case?
<7> it's just fine
<0> anyway I like my description better, though maybe I should point to smart-questions.html#before instead.
<3> Mulkin: E: Invalid operation add.
<0> mic_p: install
<0> oops, no
<7> apt-key add .. i think is what he meant
<7> !apt-key 123
<6> gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 123 ; gpg --export 123 | sudo apt-key add -;
<7> yeah .. like that
<9> oops, yeah
<10> hi
<9> apt-key not apt-get
<1> abrotman: 123 isn't a valid keyid though!
<10> how do i use a folder for bins?
<0> !apt-key 2006
<6> gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 2006 ; gpg --export 2006 | sudo apt-key add -;
<10> (like /usr/bin -> so that i can tipe the name of the binary and it will start)
<0> JoyFM: why?
<7> stew: abc123 ?
<9> JoyFM: You set it in you $PATH environment variable
<0> JoyFM: are you using software which is not in apt??
<10> yes
<7> eh .. why is that factoid messed up ?
<0> JoyFM: ah. then what Maulkin said.
<7> oh .. it's not
<11> FNORD!
<0> plugh
<10> Maulkin, thx
<3> Maulkin: Yes, not it work! But now it say me: Failed to fetch file:///home/debian/debian/dists/testing/Release No MD5Sum entry in Release file /var/lib/apt/lists/_XXX
<9> JoyFM: export $PATH=$PATH:/path/to/folder
<10> yes i see thank you very much
<9> mic_p: I'd suggest having a look at minidinstall. It'll do this stuff for you
<0> Maulkin: isnt there 1 too many $ sign there?
<9> jspiro: Possibly
<1> definately
<9> Damn
<0> JoyFM: export PATH=$PATH:/path/to/folder
<9> That's the one
<11> i have an package (mailman) that won't upgrade , it installs and then is still marked as not upgraded, how do I force it to be upgraded?
<12> Hello. I'm trying apt-get install libsasl2-modules and it says "libsasl2-modules: Depends: libsasl2 (= 2.1.19-1.5sarge1) but 2.1.19-1.9 is to be installed". What can i do?
<1> zignig: tries "apt-get -f install" or "dpkg --configure -a" ?
<13> is there a way to know all the packets installed with apt-get ?
<9> serkon: Try 'apt-get update'
<3> Maulkin: I'll try it. Thanks
<9> toshiro: Not with apt-get, but you can get a list of packages installed on the system with 'dpkg -l'
<12> Maulkin Already tried, nothing changed
<13> Maulkin, thanks
<14> I am unable to record sound when I record from my TV card and I am running out of ideas
<11> stew: tried both, I even tried un-installing and re-installing, no dice.
<14> anybody here that can help ?
<15> how do i flag a partition to be fsck'd next boot?
<1> serkon: 2.1.19-1.9 doesn't appear to be in debian. do you have non-debian repositories in your sources.list?
<15> my ext3 is going fishing on me
<1> zignig: what is making you say it is not installed?
<9> serkon: then do 'apt-get install libsasl2-modules libsasl2'
<7> myren: touch /forcefsck
<15> cute, ok
<11> stew: it is installed..... ; when I do an 'apt-get upgrade' it upgrades it _again_ , every time.
<16> whats the util to see all the processes that start at startup like ntsysv etc..
<15> ohh ironic
<15> touch: cannot touch `/forcefsck': Read-only file system
<9> wimpies: Just ask your question please
<15> for some reason my fs went RO, even though mount still says rw
<12> stew Ah. Yes, that should be the problem. Thank you
<9> cplx: "ls /etc/init.d/"?
<11> myren: mount -o remount,rw <path>
<14> maulkin : I just upgraded to 2.6.15 from 2.6.12
<14> and i have a script that uses mencoder to record from my TV card
<16> Maakuth: no.. its a utility.. shows all the progs that start at startup.
<14> before it ran just find (audio + video_
<1> zignig: what are the first two letters returned from "dpkg -l mailman | tail -1" ? what does "apt-cache policy mailman" say for Installed: and Candidate:?
<17> myren: it detected errors and was mounted with errors=remount-ro option. That's normal. DONT do remount,rw
<14> but now it only records video
<10> bash: export: `/usr//bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11:/usr/games=/usr//bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11:/usr/games:/home/johannes/winecvs/bin': not a valid identifier
<17> zignig: that's a BAD advice.
<14> I can hear the audio of the TV card but am not able to make mencoder put that audio in to the
<14> recorded video file.
<15> jelly: how do i get the thing to fsck properly then next boot?
<15> if i cant touch /forcefsck
<14> AFAIK the mixer switches are OK
<15> because the fs is ro
<17> myren: it will fsck when mount sees it has errors.
<14> so the problem I have is why can i Hear the tV audio al right but cannot record from it
<1> myren: why not just fsck it now?
<11> stew: ii mailman 2.1.8-1 Powerful, web-based mailing list manager
<14> I have also tried to record from my microphone, that does not work either
<14> however SKYPE is able to use it (i tried the echo test)
<16> Anyone know?
<14> and also I hear the microphone on my speakrs
<14> so what might be wrong ?
<16> whats the util to see all the processes that start at startup like ntsysv etc..
<11> jelly: TRUE , but he can touch the /forcefsck file....
<11> jelly: best just to dismount and fsck the drive.
<15> stew: ooohh yeah, its ro, i can fsck it
<15> Thanks!
<18> I ask that, as a temporary workaround
<18> I ask, as a temporary workaround, that
<15> i hope this fsck.ext2 knows what its doing, i certainly dont
<18> Which is better grammar?
Return to
#debian
or
Go to some related
logs:
bison examples python
zaydana
Firc lataa
dd opening '/dev/hda': permission denied
ironpython pyserial
tg3 FC5 modprobe
php+count(*)+match+against
#gaim
#perl
#linuxhelp
|
|