| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37
Comments:
<0> hawkeey: ya, i use VIA SATA 1 controller in 2.6 right now
<1> sid mplayer will give you that info..
<0> hawkeey: i just added the right driver to my handmade kernel this afternoon
<0> hawkeey: but note that it comes in the default kernel because people want to install onto sata of course
<0> hawkeey: so don't get the idea you'll have to compile one
<2> grendal_prime: yea but mplayer has 40 dependencies that total over 40 megs probably...
<0> sid: i've been wondering that a while myself
<2> Do I need all that to identify what type of video a file is.
<3> mhall: ok, I saw people having problems with the 2.6 kernel and SATA online, but perhaps that is in the past
<3> ipw3945-source is a package that looks like Intel is trying to get into Debian
<1> sid..i dont link so..
<1> hold on ill check
<0> hawkeey: well maybe it depends on the controller, and 2.6 is kind of odd, because... they changed the way they make kernels
<0> hawkeey: they use a much more traditional code syncing tool as opposed to a patch-based model
<0> hawkeey: so they do not hack on the major and minor revision number as much, because they test with test kernels
<3> mhall: ok
<4> rue_home: do you mean apt-cache policy?
<3> At this point, I think I can technically do this, but I might have to compile some stuff outside of the Debian package tree
<5> oh hhehe
<0> hawkeey: so, what this means for you of course, is... old 2.6 is unusually old
<2> grendal_prime: http://www.rafb.net/paste/results/ZLtOQr98.html
<1> 4977kb but ya there is a ****load of stuff that goes with it.
<0> hawkeey: note what ls -l of the 2.6 directory of ftp.kernel.org shows as the modification time
<1> ya
<1> i dont know sid i was looking for something that would give me info on an avi some time back..and what i found was mplayer.
<1> and then i had to fire it up and limit it to one frame or something like that.
<2> I know I could use mplayer...(mplayer -identify file.blah)...but there must be something not as large/robust.(small/fast/easy)
<5> how do I find out what version of debian my system thinks it is?
<6> sid what kinds of info do you need?
<2> vars: The audio / video codec...bitrate of each. aspect ratio
<5> what version is 3.1?
<2> sarge
<2> !3.1
<7> i guess 3.1 is sarge
<5> thanks
<8> !3.2
<2> hehe
<2> !3.2
<7> from memory, 3.2 is etch
<4> dpkg: since when?
<4> dpkg: factinfo 3.2
<7> 3.2 -- last modified 2s ago by sid!n=eth8274@unaffiliated/kerplunk.
<2> !3.2
<7> 3.2 is probably going to be etch...when it is released(estimated time when I wrote this factiod was december 2006)
<8> !factinfo 2.3
<7> 2.3 -- created by jor <jor@kabel064015.kabel.utwente.nl> at Mon Nov 27 19:32:31 2000 (2001 days); it has been requested 28 times, last by nkuttler at Tue Nov 8 05:42:24 2005.
<4> dpkg: forget 3.2
<8> !2.3
<7> from memory, 2.3 is going to be woody. But it's not released yet. It's also the unstable Linux kernel series, which became 2.4
<8> Eh.
<2> chealer: psh...my 3.2 was fine
<4> hehe
<4> sid: since when is Etch going to be Debian 3.2?
<8> dpkg, 2.3 is not woody.
<7> ...but 2.3 is already something else...
<4> dpkg: forget 2.3
<7> chealer: i forgot 2.3
<3> what's going on with this module-***istant stuff
<8> chealer: I think Etch will be version 3.2... can't remember where I read that though.
<4> sanxiyn: OK, if you can find a reference it can be teached again
<2> chealer: I dunno I made it up and ***umed.
<4> sid: I ***ume it's better forgotten
<4> hawkeey: what m-a stuff?
<9> I want to install telnet service in my debian system, what package should I installed?
<2> chealer: * 3.1 ? sarge, 6 June 2005 // * 3.0 ? woody, 19 July 2002 // * 2.2 ? potato, 15 August 2000 // * 2.1 ? slink, 9 March 1999 // * 2.0 ? hamm, 24 July 1998 // * 1.3 ? bo, 2 June 1997 // * 1.2 ? rex, 12 December 1996 // * 1.1 ? buzz, 17 June 1996
<4> john_xzyxzy: did you try $ apt-cache search telnetd ?
<2> seems to fit
<2> It won't warrant >3.1 ... and they aren't using more then the tenth decimal place.
<2> It's a good ***umption.
<10> i am trying to install debian-stable and i have trouble with RAID.
<10> the partitioner wants to have RAID1 device #0 as one big chunk as if it
<10> didn't have a partition table, yet when i tell it to create 4 partitions
<10> it says that it failed creating the 2nd, 3rd and 4th, \
<4> sid: seems to be a guess
<2> But that's all it is....a guess.
<2> That's why dpkg said "guess"
<10> (oops)
<8> sid: Once there was discussion about whether Etch should be 3.2 or 4.0.
<10> i am trying to install debian-stable and i have trouble with RAID. the partitioner wants to have RAID1 device #0 as one big chunk as if it didn't have a partition table, yet when i tell it to create 4 partitions it says that it failed creating the 2nd, 3rd and 4th, ...
<9> apt-cache search telnetd
<9> francine - an extremely configurable console login program
<9> heimdal-servers - Servers for Heimdal Kerberos
<9> inetutils-telnetd - Telnet server
<9> krb5-telnetd - Secure telnet server supporting MIT Kerberos
<10> ... but i look with fdisk /dev/md/0 and i see them... so it's partitioned correctly, but the curses-based partition manager refuses to acknowledge this, so i can't install debian. any ideas?
<11> Has anybody figured out how to test the integrity of .djvu files? Or is djvudump the best there is?
<5> does anyone have problems compiling 2.4.22 with gcc 4.0.2-2?
<12> john_xzyxz: try just telnet
<13> good evening all
<5> cause I am and I kernel guys are telling me gcc is screwed
<13> can someone tell me how to tie my lpr queue to a cups printer? seems mozilla can find the cups network printer (its on my local lan) but lpr isn't tied to the system or the appropriate queue?
<5> so the current version of gcc for sarge is broken
<5> because it cant compile kernel 2.4.22
<4> rue_home: yes, gcc is broken in sarge. Linux too, and the coreutils. it will be fixed in the next version. meanwhile, you can use gentoo
<8> chealer: Oh, really?
<4> sanxiyn: of course...those funny Debian RMs thought 3 years was enough to produce a stable release
<5> obvoiusly not he answer I want
<8> chealer: gcc seems to work for me on Sarge...
<5> I want to know why I get
<5> /usr/src/linux-2.4.22/include/asm/processor.h:75: error: array type has incomplete element type
<4> sanxiyn: </sarcasm>
<5> when i try to compile a brand new copy of 2..22
<5> 2.4.22
<4> rue_home: why are you trying to compile Linux?
<3> rue_home: where did you get the linux source from?
<5> I asked in #kernel, they say I have a bad version of gcc
<14> hello guys
<11> sigh.
<14> does anyone can help me to access my usb flashdisk in simply mepis?
<5> I'm trying to recompile my kernel
<5> I do that every so often
<5> and I will for a long time
<5> go ahead, say the kernel source is broken, I dare ya
<8> rue_home: Kernel is broken.
<8> rue_home: The issue even has Kernel bug number.
<8> rue_home: To be exact, Kernel bug #5478 WILL_NOT_FIX.
<4> rue_home: do you have anything to motivate us to help you compile an insecure Linux version rather than simply using a stock kernel?
<12> wtf?
<12> are you trying to say that compiling your own kernel is insecure?
<5> I like it compiled the way _I_ want it
<4> onetinsoldier: [00:44] <5> 2.4.22
<3> rue_home: where did you download the kernel source from
<3> rue_home did you download the source from kernel.org or the debian source package
<5> its the kernel I'm using its downlaoded from ftp.kernel.org I wanted to change an option
<3> rue_home: use the debian source package and change the option there
<8> rue_home: YOU CANT COMPILE KERNEL 2.4 WITH GCC 4!
<15> how do i get lame and how do i compile it so i can use grip?
<13> guess not heh
<2> !tell john about marillat
<2> JohnDoh: What version of debian are you running?
<4> !tell Johnny_5 about lame
<15> thanx
<2> JohnDoh: Do you know what version of debian you run?
<5> I dont want kernel 2.6
<5> the keybaord never works
<5> and they changed around all the option locations
<8> rue_home: Use GCC 3.x to compile Kernel 2.4!
<8> ...
<12> so why not try 2.4.27?
<8> GCC 4 will never work.
<16> hi everyone, i have just apt-get dist-upgraded on a box and I'm getting
<16> errors about gpg verification (what do i /msg dpkg?) - or can someone
<16> tell me how i can have them verified (i upgraded from stable to testing)
<16> damn p[aste
<5> and th new versions dont support ipchanins properly
<5> it wouldn't help
<8> rue_home: Are you listening
<17> I was having problems with DL140 G2 installing debian, i found it was the 2.6 kernel I selected that was causing the problems, once I went back to the default 2.4 the problem went away, I was going to build a 2.6 kernel from sources and see if it was just missing something important but I noticed the latest one in sarge is 2.6.8-2 unless I want to use em64t which I want to avoid 64 bit. Should I be ok downloading the stable 2.6 fro
<5> I dont know why I have 4, its proabbaly cause soemthing needed it
<18> mick_linux: /topic
<5> I never _just_ upgrade
Return to
#debian
or
Go to some related
logs:
core duo 2 cflags
mod_php _SESSION session_start()
d2gs 1.11
#gaim
#linux
gentoo live root access
gdk-pixbuf-csource: command not found
#php
donausonne
apt-find deb
|
|