| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45
Comments:
<0> I know.
<1> Roey: install x-window-system
<2> !tell Roey about unstable
<1> Roey: err x-window-system-core
<1> Roey: why do you want xorg7?
<3> well
<4> You could always gin up a html page and view it in firefox, with Flash plugin installed.
<5> Eulex: I promise you it is 'flash video', we make them at work
<3> i have a problem myself
<0> The following packages have unmet dependencies:\n x-window-system: Depends: x-window-system-core
<6> RobHu, it's a pity. i've got so many good movies in that format
<3> i want to install the new gnome
<3> 2.14
<4> Roey: apt-get install x-window-system-core
<5> InitM***: There might be a way, I just didn't find it
<7> RobHu, ah, ok
<1> Roey: run apt-get update
<3> but i dont know how
<0> stew, freeone3000 I've tried.
<4> Roey: More unmet depends?
<4> Roey: Try aptitudeing it.
<6> RobHu, and to install a plugin for ff isn't the way to go?
<4> (aptitude install x-window-system-core)
<5> InitM***: I don't know - it was about 6 months ago I tried to get it to work
<3> nobady???? =(
<6> RobHu, do you know how to check which version of flashplayer is installed into my ff?
<5> chicalinux: Whats the problem? Can you not find it in apt?
<5> InitM***: Sorry no. Although you can look in apt maybe?
<0> freeone3000: using aptitude, I get the feeling that it's probably like swallowing a big fat cock. I hate this thing.
<4> Roey: But it fixes depends.
<8> ggg
<0> freeone3000: (apt-get user here)
<0> freeone3000: didn't fix it for me :)
<4> It's also slow, and rather... yeah.
<3> no is the i use ubuntu and i dont know is gnome2.14 will worh there
<0> freeone3000: the only method it offered of fixing the dependencies for me was to remove X :P
<7> chicalinux & RobHu, gnome 2.14 is not in debian yet. parts are, but not all of it.
<1> Roey: put your sources.list into a pastebin
<0> stew: ah! ok, one sec.
<8> goodevening to florence
<7> chicalinux, and those parts are in unstable, and possibly in testing
<3> uyyy
<9> Okay, this is funny. When I plug my two debian boxes into the network that the Vonage box is doing DHCP for, they both get .102. When I plug them into my network with the linksys box doing DHCP, they get unique IPs.
<10> quit
<7> chicalinux, basically, to get a full gnome 2.14, you'd need to build it yourself.
<0> stew: http://rafb.net/paste/results/aZOc1964.html
<3> jjejejejejejje i wait :)
<0> stew: btw thanks
<1> Eulex: he's not using debian
<1> chicalinux: go to #ubuntu for questions about ubuntu
<7> stew, who? RobHu?
<5> I'm using Debian - but I'm not sure why I'm part of this conversation ;-)
<7> ah, chicalinux
<1> Eulex: chicalinux
<3> =( but i like here i have to go ?
<11> anyone is using enblend?
<5> chicalinux: Have you looked on the gnome site itself ?
<12> tarzeau: sporadically yes
<1> Roey: xorg is broken for amd64 atm, check the bts
<0> AHHHH
<0> ok
<3> yes
<7> chicalinux, if you install debian you can stay
<11> cahoot: your own debian package?
<0> stew: YES I thought it was.
<0> stew: thank you for confirming
<5> chicalinux: Doesnt it tell you how to install it on there?
<11> cahoot: it's in ITP(wnpp) for over 400 days... it's HILARIOUS
<0> stew: the xfonts packages are held back.
<11> cahoot: 5 or so people discuss packaging it. nobody does it
<3> welll ok byeee guys
<1> Roey: /msg dpkg held back
<0> stew: do you know anything regarding when they'll get fixed?
<11> cahoot: i'm building a package now, of 0.2.5
<1> Roey: no, the bts probably does though
<11> err 2.5
<3> i am goig to debian-es
<12> tarzeau: IIRC I pulled an unofficial deb
<1> chicalinux: no, #ubuntu-es
<0> stew: you helped me big-time, thanks
<11> cahoot: ubuntu?
<12> I'll look
<11> cahoot: hilarious anyways. is it so hard to maintain a package for non DD people?
<11> something is ****ING WRONG with debian
<11> if there's so much unofficial debs
<11> debian used to be cool
<11> it used to have the latest software
<11> AND NOW?
<11> PERMASUNDAYON#DEBIAN
<0> stew: I check b.d.o/xorg but this does not mention amd64 at all
<13> hey, i got problem with xserver-xorg and ATi videocard driver
<11> miki2: YOUR PROBLEM!
<11> miki2: #ati
<13> its related to xserver-xorg
<11> !SID FAQ
<14> well, sid faq is http://wooledge.org/~greg/sidfaq.html
<1> miki2: you have to tell us what the exact problem is
<4> ATi video card drivers. I dislike them.
<0> miki2: hehe
<11> !TOPICSMITE miki2
<14> And the wrath of /TOPIC descended with terrible fury upon miki2. And all the people marveled, saying, Behold, we too should read the /TOPIC, lest we be stricken. And all the people read the /TOPIC, and went away edified.
<12> tarzeau: the deb is gone - have enblend, version 2.3 on my system - god knows from where
<11> cahoot: don't worry, tarzeau the hero will maintain it in debian
<13> so i should ask in #ati about xserver-xorg?
<12> tarzeau: nice work
<11> miki2: you should not use sid
<13> y not
<11> WHY NOT?
<11> !eat miki2
<15> tarzeau: ehehe
<16> miki2: because clueless people shouldn't, frankly. one should know what they're doing with sid, it's not just stable with another name ....
<7> !calmdown tarzeau and miki2
<12> tarzeau: you also provide the panotools then?
<15> :annoy Eulex
<15> !annoy Eulex
<11> cahoot: once i find someone to sponsor enblend, why not
<16> @annoy mhall
<7> hehehe
<17> mhall: HOW TO THIS?????
<15> simonrvn: heh
<11> cahoot: but i'll keep the panopictures of my nude spanked secretary for myself
<15> Eulex: damn you Eulex you win this time
<4> Eh... I had some trouble with unstable. New X. Someone should make the dependences correct themselves. :)
<11> cahoot: i hope you understand this little privacy
<15> tarzeau: porn trading?
<12> tarzeau: yeah I guess he wants it that way too ;)
<7> mhall, won't last long :)
<11> mhall: what do you have? :)
<16> freebse: XSF worked on it all night last night. should be fixed soon
<16> freebse: woops
<16> freeone3000: ^^^
<15> The following packages will be REMOVED: ... nvidia-glx ... o_O
<4> It doesn't have openGL support anyway.
<16> yes, because of a stupid dep that hasn't been updated yet
<15> tarzeau: let's see
<16> mhall: ^^^
<16> same goes for the -legacy package
<15> tarzeau: 47G of a 187G volume plus 34G of a 140G volume
<16> ffs, my main box has less than 47 GB ...
<11> mhall: great i've got 230 G free disk space
<4> Ooh. HP. Those're nice. :)
<18> tarzeau: without a reboot, and doing nothing in particular, the harddisk seems to be fine again now.... this is really weird
<19> When I insert a memory card into my card reader, and try to mount, it says "/dev/sda1 does not exist", I can fdisk /dev/sda and I can see partition 1. I think it's something to do with udev - is there a way to make it 'refresh', or always create sda1?
<16> heh, nice phat pair of 36 GB SCSI drives would be fine :P
<11> dpy2: it could be the firmware, these days those disks also have a list of badblocks
Return to
#debian
or
Go to some related
logs:
#math
#css
emerge.log chmod
#gentoo
#php
#perl
#qmail
track mania speedhack
#javascript
slackware megaraid_sas
|
|