| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
Comments:
<0> eBug: then get startx from sid... or wait until experimental xorg installs it.
<1> !tell sobersabre about enter
<2> sobersabre: intuitively i would say no more than 15 10Mbit connected machines
<3> rmrfchik, I'll have to look into it later
<4> rmrfchik: ask #debian-kde
<5> sep thank you for the education. quitte it is at least 100Mb network
<6> chealer thank, didnt knew about this channel
<2> sobersabre: the server should have a faster connection to the switch than the clients
<5> quitte I see. the network infrastructure ( switches, routers etc. ) is 100Mb.
<5> we though have internal 1000Mb switch, but unfortunately it has only 24 ports.
<5> I think we should buy another fatter 1000Mb switch, and to p*** all NFS via it.
<2> how about a 100Mbit switch with gigabit uplink? the load would be balanced out between the clients without you having to do anything about it
<5> quitte Q. is is the network the bottleneck or the RAID itself ?
<2> i don't know. never played with Gbit myself. but for 100M the net is the bottleneck
<5> OK.
<5> hm... well, if a HD can go at 320 Mb/s...
<7> good luck finding a disk that fast
<5> I guess at 1G, the hard disk starts being the problem.
<5> jm_ ... SCSI disks report these speeds...
<5> haven't tested them thoroughly.
<7> sobersabre: yes, but don't reach them, that's the interface speed
<2> jm_: maybe he means 320mbit?
<7> sobersabre: it also depends on what you'll be doing via NFS
<5> quitte in disks the speed is in megabytes. ( but for marketing reasons maybe 1M=1000000)
<7> quitte: no that would be way too slow
<5> jm_ the usual work: high throughput computations, multicast networking :)
<2> i should have added a smiley
<7> sobersabre: I can't quite correlate that to NFS
<5> jm_ of course it mainly memory/network/CPU intensive, but some output is put on disk.
<5> as well as some input taken.
<7> sobersabre: ok so the clients read input from NFS server and write results to it
<2> what is that etc/netconfig file the libnss-ldap nsswitch example mentions?
<5> rite.
<7> I guess it depends on how much data there is
<5> jm_ usually there's not much data, but there are bursts.
<7> quitte: where do you see that?
<8> Hi !
<9> why i'm getting this error? http://img46.imageshack.us/img46/5247/problem4be.jpg
<9> normal boot
<2> jm_: /usr/share/doc/libnss-ldap/examples/nsswitch.ldap
<8> i configure my eth0 and rausb0 interface in my /etc/network/interface eth0 192.168.1.3 and rausb0 192.168.1.100
<8> but when i rebott, eth0 169.234...... and rausb0 169.174....... ?
<8> Why my IP change on boot ?
<8> i purge dhcp-client but the same
<10> yoo: Can you paste your /etc/network/interfaces file into http://channels.debian.net/paste/ please?
<9> why i'm getting this egrep message at boot? http://img46.imageshack.us/img46/5247/problem4be.jpg
<8> PerfDave, ok
<7> quitte: ignore that on Linux
<9> eth0:152 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:01:29:F0:84:12
<9> 152 ?
<9> eth0:166 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:01:29:F0:84:12
<9> omg and counting
<7> quitte: netconfig man page on Solaris explains it
<10> tulioanjos: It looks like something is setting up aliases on your interface.
<9> it is on my online machine
<9> but what is egrep? i'm getting this message ..
<2> jm_ does that mean i cannot use ldap for services and hosts?
<8> http://channels.debian.net/paste/1960 PerfDave
<7> quitte: good question, I would just test it
<10> yoo: Hmm, why do you have two interfaces on the same IP network?
<10> yoo: That's going to get confusing.
<7> quitte: it may be this is generic nsswitch example
<2> jm_ doesn't work for me. but i'd prefer if it did. otoh i didn't get anything to work,yet. but ldapsearch -x works just fine
<9> but what is egrep? i'm getting this message ..
<2> jm_: any idea what nsswitch service i could easily test that doesn't use pam,too?
<10> tulioanjos: Maybe the thing that's setting aliases on your interface is using egrep?
<7> quitte: getent p***wd?
<9> no
<9> thats a secopnd computer
<8> PerfDave http://channels.debian.net/paste/1961
<8> my ifconfig return command
<8> PerfDave not the same
<11> tulioanjos: you can't be running linux and not know what egrep is...
<10> yoo: You didn't answer my question.
<8> 192.168.1.3 and 192.168.1.100
<7> quitte: or name resolution - ping foo
<10> yoo: Why do you have two interfaces on the same IP network?
<9> fluxdude come on
<8> PerfDave, sorry i'm french i translate :)
<11> come on what?
<8> ok
<10> !fr
<12> [fr] Les personnes qui parlent francais et qui ont besoin d'une aide a propos de Debian peuvent venir sur #debianfr - People speaking french and in need of support for debian, please join #debianfr
<8> because i install ralink usb dongle but i must have network for download the drivers !
<8> PerfDave,
<2> jm_: getent p***wd works
<8> so iuse eth
<2> jm_: but ping foo doesn't but that'd be hosts
<8> eth0 for download ralink drivers
<5> thanks all.
<10> yoo: You don't want to have two interfaces on the same IP network, both up at the same time. This may be affecting your situation.
<8> PerfDAve i do ifdown eth0 and change /etc/network/interface and reboot
<8> i tell you the result
<13> Hi! Could someone tell me if it's normal that I can't install flash plugin using aptitude install flashplugin-nonfree? It seems that URL the package checks for tarball is no longer available...
<10> yoo: Make sure you remove the "auto eth0" line.
<7> quitte: yeah
<14> hi
<9> [+] kernel 2.4.20-31.9 vulnerable: YES exploitable YES
<7> oWo2002: check BTS
<14> I installed apache2, then decided I didnt want it and done apt-get remove apache2, but when I rebooted it is sill starting and exists in /etc/apache2
<11> oWo2002: did you try updating your package lists...
<15> norskfjord: dpkg -l apache*
<11> tulioanjos: what are you talking about now? and what was the come on about earlier?
<9> fluxdude: nothing
<9> no one want help me
<11> i'll help if you ask me a straight question right now...
<7> norskfjord: start using aptitude
<9> when i tried to boot the debian today
<9> this message stucked on the screen: http://img46.imageshack.us/img46/5247/problem4be.jpg
<11> one of the boot up scripts is probably calling egrep, just like the last guy said. do you know what egrep is?
<9> no
<11> egrep filters strings based on regular expressions, it's the "enhanced/extended grep"
<9> i dont know what egrep is
<2> can adduser work with ldap servers now? or do i have to use adduser-ldap from svn?
<11> is a core util, if you know know unix tool chains, you won't get much out of linux or unix...
<11> how long u been using linux/unix tulioanjos
<9> fluxdude: weeks
<11> ok, that explains it, debian is a bit hard for a first go in linux i think, nothing really works outta the box...
<11> fedora would be more fun for you
<11> it works straight off...
<8> PerfDave, http://channels.debian.net/paste/1962
<11> gui and everything...
<8> the same problem only with rausb0
<16> fluxdude: at least send him to a debian knockoff of somethign :)
<10> fluxdude: Uhm, plenty of stuff works out of the box on Debian.
<9> norskfjord: i lov debian
<8> Why inet adr:169.254.117.208 ?
<8> i purge dhcp-client
<11> i would but i absolutely hate ubuntu, it shouldn't exist, all wasted effort should have been ploughed into debian...
<8> perhaps hotplug problem
<17> Hi all!
<10> yoo: If it was affecting eth0 as well, sounds more like some startup script or similar doing something whacky.
<18> fluxdude: I don't like ubuntu, but i prefer ubuntu to redhat anyway :)
<10> yoo: What happens if you just bring up eth0, and have rausb0 unplugged?
<11> maybe, i think they're both sh**.
<17> someone here uses apt-proxy? All packages that Im trying to retrieve is returning 302 moved temporarily. Any tips?
<9> i just want to know
<9> how to fix this
<11> suse is better than fedora...
<11> but nearly everything is better than rpm based distros.
<18> then tell him to go on with suse :)
<11> fedora seems to be the standard noob thing...
<9> on my botnet
<16> or help the guy fix the problem :)
<17> fluxdude: rpm management is a living hell.
<9> i use the command !tx uname -a|grep 2.4
<9> to return only 2.4 kernels
<11> what's to fix, it's not causing a problem, he just doesn't know why he's getting this text during boot...
<18> Ronin: a *2 weeks* might have problem to fix an egrep problem at boot time, don't you think ? :)
<16> Fox: which is why theyre here :)
Return to
#debian
or
Go to some related
logs:
#mysql
vger1 dyndns.org
installing nload
#css
debian unstable no /dev/psaux
ubuntu unistall wine
+preseed +partman +primary partitions
inspeak+linux
#centos
COMMANT undernet
|
|
