| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Comments:
<0> thks a lot, guys, it was really helpful. I will forward your recommendations to tech guys and see what they can do about it
<1> blueser: Evolution secretly suggest windows
<0> donavan: nah... he wouldn't do it. at least not here ;)
<2> nah. I fully support the GNU/HURD movement
<0> aye aye, sir! :)
<2> HURD4EVA!
<3> Evolution: when you're done with your CentOS/HURD fork, would you mind to build a CentOS/Solaris fork?
<3> :p
<0> see ya all. thks again. if I gather any useful information, I'll post back here
<2> Dyson: opensolaris good enough for you?
<3> Evolution: maybe...
<3> Evolution: I just want CentOS on NetBSD :)
<3> *duck*
<2> mmmmmm netbsd
<3> donavan: you don't understand... I'm stoned by nature :)
<2> Dyson: man netbsd is great. I ran it for a while on a 386 laptop with a 110MB hard drive and 8MB of ram
<3> Evolution: yep. It really works nice
<2> 110 MB was enough space for me to have vim, and some basic utilities.
<2> it was spiffy
<3> yep. these guys have the "advantage" of building their own core utilities
<3> so there aren't any weird dependencies which force you to build a 250 MB OS core
<4> Evolution: im installing COS4 as guest os.. i can't seem to get either the lsi drivers to see the disk, and buslogic isnt in the list of available drivers ..
<4> this is vmware 5.0
<3> xai: did you try with a virtual ata adapter?
<3> xai: shouldn't make any real difference in performance
<5> One of the two is broken in vmware 5.0, and I cannot remember which one. IDE works though
<3> xai: and you can always add a virtual scsi-adapter later for more disks and stuff
<4> Dyson: ok, that's my next move.
<3> xai: you're going to send me a new buildhost for free? great! :)
<6> hello
<6> which package provides this file /usr/lib/libsablot.so.0?
<6> i have
<6> CentOS release 4.3 (Final)
<6> Cannot load /usr/local/apache/libexec/libphp4.so into server: /usr/lib/libsablot.so.0: undefined symbol: readline
<5> No package in CentOS does. But you can tell rpm to tell you.
<5> That's no CentOS apache.
<6> yeah its no
<6> its fscking cpanel
<6> anyway, any ideas how i could fix this error
<6> ?
<5> So why aren't you asking them? The file you search comes from sablotron, which isn't in CentOS.
<6> file is installed
<6> but i have that error
<4> Does the server iso have a buslogic driver in it?
<5> xai: Yes.
<4> I don't see it listed , but perhaps it was renamed.
<4> im in the installer looking for it several times..
<5> At least I think so.
<5> symtab: Looks like the sablotron version and the php version don't play well together. If that also came installed with cpanel you should ask their support, as *both* packages aren't CentOS packages.
<1> upgrade to the latest vmware workstation, your license works
<5> Or do that.
<5> Both controllers work there.
<1> EL4 isn't "supported" on vmware WS5 IIRC
<4> donavan: you think its a vmware problem? buslogic is part of the install kernel?
<5> xai: Yes. CentOS 4 works great with vmware 5.5 but has problems with 5.0-
<4> range: i just checked.. it is vmware ws 5.5.. not sure why its choking.
<4> If I could get to a virtual console in vmware i might be able to check modules and etc..
<4> perhaps my version of the centos4 workstation iso is not what i need.
<5> Try the other controller then. vmware gives you two to choose from.
<4> range: i tried both scsi controlers, i can try ide now..
<7> Hey all...anyone gotten mod_security working with the built-in apache install?
<8> scottder: yes
<8> http://centos.karan.org/el4/extras/stable/i386/RPMS/repodata/repoview/mod_security-0-1.9.4-1.el4.kb.html
<7> ahh thanks
<9> bye
<10> Anyone seen a black screen of death trying to boot AMD64 CentOS 4.3? (black screen w/ flashing cursor). Verified MD5sum of image, burned 3 copies (2 at lower speeds)
<10> IBM x306 server
<10> Doesn't even make it to LILO
<11> Argh, a new dual core system we just set up has started getting kernel panics!
<11> hey you ex mlug person
<12> me??
<1> Hobart: what .iso image did you burn?
<1> orlock: don't blame the kernel
<10> donavan -> centos-4.3-ia64-disc1.iso
<1> hobart, yes to answer your question
<1> you have the wrong media
<10> Oh ****ing hell. HAHAHAHHAHAA
<1> watch the words please
<10> Sorry. :)
<1> ia64 != AMD64 or em64T
<10> The giant "IDIOT" sign falling on my head ruffled me.
<8> Hobart: you are not number 1 with this mistake
<10> Yeah.
<1> you seek the x86_64 release
<11> woo
<11> kernel BUG at include/asm/spinlock.h:133
<11> donavan: well, the kernels blaming itself :)
<1> orlock: what hardware?
<11> donavan: AMDx2 3800+, 2xsata drives, software raid0
<1> motherboard?
<11> Gigabyte GA-K8N51GMF-9
<11> same as in my desktop
<11> i got woken up cos the ****er crashed :-\
<11> NoZy: yeah :)
<12> ok
<11> donavan: seems to be a common dual core issue, dang
<13> pie box is U8 allready
<13> is there close the 4.4 Centos ?
<1> irens: what are you rambling on about?
<14> ????
<13> what about centos 4.4 ?
<1> what about it?
<13> any rumours that redhat will update it RHEL 4 to update number 4 ?
<1> irens: can you formulate a question that makes sense?
<13> oh.
<13> do you know something about next update from redhat for redhat enterprase linux number 4 ?
<13> centos 4.3 is based on huge update number 3, it's correct ?
<1> nope
<14> sounds like a question for #redhat
<11> donovan: yeah, its a kernel bug
<13> eh.
<1> with what cpu's orlock ?
<13> sorry for brother you.
<11> dual core AMD
<11> seems to be a lot of reports of it
<1> irens centos 4 = rhel 4 based
<1> centos 4.3 = RHEL 4 update 3 based
<1> whats this piebox rubbish?
<13> Donovan: ok, that is the point: any roumors about update 4 ?
<11> ask redhat? :)
<1> irens: I'm not a RH insider, nor do I have RHN access, but I've heard nothing official
<1> or unofficial
<1> rhel3 update 8 has been released from what I understand
<11> "large north american linux distributor"
<1> orlock: does that issue affect intel core duo as well?
<11> donavan: know of any "official" rhel kernels newer than 2.6.9-34?
<11> donavan: i dont know - not that google tells me, its all dual core amd
<11> its only happened twice in a month
<1> let me find a link to the "potential" update 4 kernel
<11> cool
<11> i was just about to try find it and go through the cangelog
<13> donovan: ok. thanks
<1> orc_orc: you are running on x86_64 correct? use this: http://dev.centos.org/centos/4/testing/x86_64/RPMS/kernel-smp-2.6.9-39.0.2.EL.x86_64.rpm
<1> orlock: rather
<1> if you chop off the file name you can index that directory
<1> for a 39.0.2 UP kernel, etc
<11> nah, not _64
<11> cool
<1> then work your way back up the tree and down the i386 path
<11> Its actually smeserver, but thats all centos bsed for the core stuff anyway
<11> yuah, should be no worris
<15> Hi, i am doing a yum update and i am getting a number of the following errors
<15> Transaction Check Error: file /usr/share/info/libc.info-1.gz from install of glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.19 conflicts with file from package glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.9
<15> Can anyone point me in the right direction in getting this fixed?
<16> weird.
<16> i'm pretty sure that's not supposed to happen1
<16> !
Return to
#centos
or
Go to some related
logs:
pylab gentoo
gst gnomevfssink gentoo
#web
#freedesktop
pine Incomplete maildomain localhost
#qemu
xero1 efnet
#gentoo
ITSOL slang
cdirip deb
|
|