| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Comments:
<0> pabluss: #openvpn are a fairly helpful crowd
<1> pabluss: /me marking up a reply -- stand by
<2> never go to #solaris, not helpful at all
<3> lovelyx: nobody cares (really)
<4> I care
<0> #ffmpeg, least helpful most elitist crowd. evar.
<4> but not about that.
<4> kee-un: I accept that challenge!
<5> kee-un: thanks but perhaps all the people are sleeping .. ;)
<5> oh oh
<5> :(
<5> ok
<2> donavan, go to #gentoo and ask what distro is the best for servers
<5> there we go again...
<2> donavan, i just know i have to try tinysofa
<3> target past time?
<4> I slept on tinysofa once in college.. my back was sore for a week
<5> ok... --> http://www.rafb.net/paste/results/1Xj4yF68.html
<5> :)
<3> kee-un: did you ask to come back?
<0> donavan: yes sir, sorry sir
<4> hahahahaha
<2> imagine a world full of tiny sofas
<4> kee-un: :-P
<0> excellent, anyway, night all
<1> pabluss: http://www.herrold.com/openvpn-multilink.html
<1> pabluss: you have to have glbally unique IP's -- line 2 (end) and 3 have the same IP on two different boxes
<5> let me see orc_orc... wait a microsft minute :D
<1> the multiple multicast looks shakey to me as well -- lones 48 thru 51
<1> it is unlikely line 35 is what you intend
<5> orc_orc: hmmm therefore my problem is with my ADSL ip internal....
<5> orc_orc: i can solve this situation with channing the ip serves in the segment 192.168.1.X for other...
<1> pabluss: the presence ot two hosts with the same IP is troubling ... a change by renumbering to solve this is needed, I think
<1> pabluss: yes
<5> orc_orc: ugly solution....
<1> pabluss: it is a pain to renumber a network segment, but that happens and is needed to solve issues from time to time
<1> the trick is to design so that it only has to be done once, as per my email posted
<5> orc_orc: ok ... i'm agree with you
<6> Zerberus: you here?
<7> yes
<6> hey now!!!
<6> could we go to chat for a just a bit?
<7> feel free to query me
<6> you do me please I've never done that
<6> right that is lol
<5> thanks orc_orc see you later...
<5> chao orc_orc
<5> ;)
<8> orc_orc: I am still trying to troubleshoot my network issue. Could you suggest anyone? I uploaded output to http://www.rafb.net/paste/results/fpdbNm11.html
<6> what's your network doin?
<4> my guess would be "nothing"
<4> :-P
<6> that not nice Ev!!
<8> lol
<4> rado1: "nice" and "right" are seldom seen together.
<4> ;-)
<6> uh huh
<6> and 2 days later I woke up talking to Elvis
<6> novafirst: what's the network not doing?
<9> Hello~ I've a problem using Yum, though it isn't about the GPG Key :D Basically when running it I get "retrygrab() failed for: http://mirrors.cat.pdx.edu/centos/3.6/addons/i386/headers/header.info, Executing failover method, failover: out of servers to try". So, am I just ment to choose something from the mirrors page and update every url in the yum.conf file?
<3> Zule: what proxy is upstream from your box?
<9> No clue I'm afraid! How'd I check?
<3> ask your network people?
<3> ohhh actually it looks like that mirror doesn't carry 3 anymore
<3> pick a different mirror from the list shown in the /topic
<9> okiedokie, thanks :)
<8> rado1: as you can see from this link http://www.rafb.net/paste/results/fpdbNm11.html I have couple linux servers. One is redhat8 and other one is centos4.3
<6> kk and?
<6> .25 is centos and 29 is RH9
<8> I am unable to ping, nslookup, or traceroute centos box from local network. Example, WinXP can ping redhat but can't ping centos. btw WinXP its on the same network and subnet
<6> you pinging from ip or hostname(s)
<8> now, the intresting thing is that I can ping centos box from another network
<8> I am pinging only IP and not hostname
<6> you goin thru a switch?
<8> also accessing internet from centos takes long time. even yum complains
<8> yes, all servers are connected to the same switch
<8> there is one difference in ip route
<6> which is?
<8> centos shows 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 scope link and redhat doesn't
<7> novafirst: nothing to worry about, that is zeroconf
<8> can I remove it from conf
<7> and your RHL8 is dead and smells like a fish from last year
<6> what box is .31?
<8> there is nothing on 31, 31 is broadcast IP
<7> novafirst: you can disable it, but it does no harm
<6> lol Zeberus
<8> Zerberus: can you tell me how
<6> bad fish
<7> echo "NOZEROCONF=yes" >> /etc/sysconfig/network; service network restart
<6> bad fish
<7> always on the small ponies
<6> Zerberus: I wrote you a book ...tell me what you think
<8> Zerberus: ok, I made that change to network file. thanks.
<8> Zerberus: I noticed ip route in RH8 has this line: 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo scope link and centos doesn't
<7> novafirst: because RHL8 is kernel 2.4 based
<7> and CentOS 4 runs a 2.6 kernel
<8> Zerberus: ok, that explains.
<8> Zerberus, rado1: Any suggestions?
<7> don't know what your problem is
<6> if I be you I'd swap out that RH8 for centos4
<6> then you be clean
<6> and rid the bad fish
<8> that is why I am here. btw RH8 is not the one with the problem, although is bad fish but at least is working. the problem is with latest centos.
<8> I am unable to ping, nslookup, or traceroute centos box from local network. Example, WinXP can ping redhat but can't ping centos. btw WinXP its on the same network and subnet
<7> novafirst: the NIC may be broken
<10> whats the command to start and stop nis
<8> if nic is broken, how come I can access it from another network
<3> novafirst: put the output of "uname -a; ifconfig -a" on the centos box into the pastebin in the /topic
<7> steve_Laptop: there is a service for ypbind
<10> ic looking at ate confg file now but it justs hangs
<8> donavan: I have put output for ip route, ip addr, ip link here: http://www.rafb.net/paste/results/fpdbNm11.html
<7> use tcpdump to analyze the traffic
<3> novafirst: what is the output of "uname -a" ?
<3> novafirst: u can paste that one line in here
<8> donavan: Linux asterix.novafirst.com 2.6.9-34.0.2.EL
<6> I dunno...I can't see how but maybe swap out the switch
<3> novafirst: go on one of the RH boxes, and type "arp 216.254.105.25 |tail -1" and paste that line in here
<8> ok
<7> rado1: < rado1> Zerberus: I wrote you a book ...tell me what you think please tell me where you did me write it
<8> donavan: 216.254.105.25 (216.254.105.25) -- no entry
<6> Zerberus: That dialog you opened between us lol
<3> novafirst: what does traceroute 216.254.105.25 do?
<7> rado1: no, nothing came up in the query
<6> lol we a mess!
<6> too funny!
<6> Zerberus: I'm gonna try to open a chat
<3> novafirst: quickly, I must go in under 3 minutes
<8> ok I am trying
<8> it find it on the second hoop
<3> is traceroute giving you * * * ?
<3> 2nd hop?
<8> yes for the first hop I get * * *
<3> then you have networking issues
<8> ok, where to start
<7> someone so "clever" to block ICMP?
<3> there is nothing wrong with your CentOS box
<3> Zerberus: two boxes on the same /27 network should never be 2 hops away
<8> ok
<7> donavan: sounds right
<8> ok
<8> so it could be the router problem
<8> because all requests are forward to gateway (router) first
<6> why???
<3> take it up with your network engineering group, they've clearly broken something somewhere
Return to
#centos
or
Go to some related
logs:
+ubuntu +how do i restart the network
postnzb
#suse
#mysql
220mx install linux
module snd_cmipci not found
Cannot seek in raw AVI streams mythtv
Gentoo EN-1216
#css
linphone SPEEX PKG_CONFIG
|
|